The Way The GOP Can Keep The Senate

I disagree, just stay with the game plan, no need to stir up more negative media coverage.

You think that standing against men using women's and girls' showers is "negative media"? How so? Exactly? (Use common sense). 99% of people are opposed to it. So how would it be "negative" media? The ads don't have to be nationwide. They can be local. But at least one reference nationwide to the GOP as a whole standing strongly opposed to deranged men using women and girls' showers would only help the GOP; no matter how fiercely Soros' media fought back. Their fighting back on that issue is a bluff. They know it would cost the dems votes... They know the number of people who are against the practice.

Is the GOP that distrusting of people's common sense and private visceral STRONG convictions on this issue? So fearful that somehow there's "a good spin on men using women's showers" that the MSM will use to beat up republicans more? Fearful that many Trumpees are actually FOR men using women's bathrooms and showers? :lmao: Quite the opposite.

It's actually one of the few areas of common ground they have with the Trumpees. And yes, the MSM will bring up the fact that Trump supports men in women's bathrooms in Trump Tower (since he said it in a live interview). And yes, that will shed many more voters away from him. But since he's already going to lose, wouldn't the GOP WANT to shed those voters in THEIR direction? Because that's where they would go. The other more lewd and degenerate Trumpees are either dem plants already or Hillary-haters so that latter group isn't likely to vote dem on down ballot candidates. Probably more likely even to slightly embrace the establishment if they felt they were aligned on at least ONE visceral issue of the day..

Misjudging the potency of the private strong convictions & being too fearful and timid on matters like this is exactly why the GOP has Trump at the top of their ticket. The GOP has become the party that is too fearful to stand for ANYTHING. And that has cost them dearly. 99%....Just sayin'...
 
Last edited:
If you think that's a good plan, you should go with it, but republicans aren't very good with social issues or logic.

They used to be. And they used to be more potent and popular. I wonder if there's a correlation between their lax stance on sexual perversion & their base falling apart.. hmmm... :eusa_think:

It seems 99% of people opposed to deranged men using womens' showers & bathrooms etc. might be useful to the GOP right now ...somehow...
 
First off, same sex locker rooms have nothing to do with this thread. Furthermore, they are not issues in this campaign. There are at least a dozen other issue more important to voters.

Same sex locker rooms? I'm talking about deranged MEN in WOMEN'S locker rooms, showers etc. That's not "same sex". There may be other important issues to this or that bloc of voters partitionally...but there is one issue that galvanizes at a gut level across evangelicals, Trumpees, moderates and indepedents (and many otherwise silent dems too). That is the INSANITY of letting men in women's rooms.

The point for the GOP is to pick THE ONE ISSUE that galvanizes the best. And that one issue is; 99% of voters visceral-rejection of men using women's rooms. It's about the GOP doing the math on bringing the stray sheep home to win and hold the Senate....and to stay around as a live, viable political party into the future.
Sex segregated facilities are an outdated relic of the Victoria era. Before the early 19th century they didn't even exist in most societies.

We are not talking about letting men in women's rooms. We are talking about facilities built to be shared by both sexes that offer privacy, but with greater safety, better accessibility, and are more economical.

Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Organizations Debunk 'Bathroom Predator Myth' A study of 200 municipalities in 18 states that have gender neutral facilities show that there has been no rise in sexual violence or other public safety issues associated with these facilities. This makes sense because sexual offenses are most common in smaller less used facilities sexual segregated facilities. The busier a facility is the less likelihood of sexual misconduct.
 
Sex segregated facilities are an outdated relic of the Victoria era.

You're aware that 99% of the American voters STRONGLY disagree with that statement when it comes to bathrooms, showers, locker rooms etc?

No? How's the view from your padded cell?

You actually think that voters with daughters, sisters, wives, mothers, grandmothers & nieces are in FAVOR of deranged males going into areas where they are disrobing...without consequence? Legally? :lmao: Ever hear of the Target boycott?
 
If you think that's a good plan, you should go with it, but republicans aren't very good with social issues or logic.

They used to be. And they used to be more potent and popular. I wonder if there's a correlation between their lax stance on sexual perversion & their base falling apart.. hmmm... :eusa_think:

It seems 99% of people opposed to deranged men using womens' showers & bathrooms etc. might be useful to the GOP right now ...somehow...

They used to be because they were a larger percentage of the population. But their decision to make enemies of large portions of the population has doomed them. Even on issues where many may agree with republicans, they still aren't going to vote for them.

That's a republican problem they created for themselves.
 
From what I have read the HOuse and Senate are safe....which leads me to believe they are lying big time about Hilly leading

You need to get out more.

Republicans Could Lose The Senate Majority
The most likely outcome is a 50-50 split. But with the Clinton-Kaine presidential ticket likely to win, it would become a Democratic majority.
Republicans Could Lose The Senate Majority | Huffington Post

The GOP’s House Majority Is Safe … Right?

The GOP’s House Majority Is Safe … Right?

No, actually you do "bro".
How much in reparations do you think is "fair" brah?

I'm not a fan of reparations Jethro .. but if reparations were possible, YOU and your right-wing bimbos have had a big hand in making that happen. You idiots just elected Hillary Clinton AND handed her 3-4 appointments to the Supreme Court .. with Obama possibly being one of them. Maybe you should ask Obama if he likes reparations. He might be sitting in judgement of their legality and possibility .. thanks to you. :0)

Yo Blackie, we cross?
 
You must not have been paying attention.

Republicans have lost every social issue they care about .. and you're suggesting that Trump run ads on social issues alone.

Good plan. :0)

This thread ISN'T ABOUT TRUMP. Read the title again.

Trump has lost the race. The election for POTUS is at this point a mere formality. This thread is about how Congress can balance out Hillary's choices for this or that. Enough moderate republicans are not going to overturn Roe V Wade. Neither are any Justices they approve of. Since the economy is not something even open for debate at this time (even the staunch GOP know the end is near and some compromise must be made), the only thing left to really rile is the complete destruction of our social norms.

There is one issue that the Trumpees and conservative GOP, as well as blacks, Hispanics and most independents agree on: deranged men do not belong in the women's showers...locker rooms or bathrooms.. Pitch that as a GOP issue, pitch it now, pitch it HARD and watch the Congress remain in the hands of republicans...

If you think that's a good plan, you should go with it, but republicans aren't very good with social issues or logic.

If you think blacks, Hispanics and many others are going to vote for republicans on bathroom issues .. that may indeed seem logical to you, but it isn't. The issues that blacks and Hispanics are voting on have nothing to do with what happens in a bathroom.

If you need Hispanic votes, best to talk about immigration.

If you need black votes, best to talk about police terrorism and misconduct.

You don't have to talk about either of those issues .. just don't fool yourself into believing they're going to vote for republicans. They aren't.

(smile) You don't know many Hispanics Sambo.
You think are just like you, lazy and stupid.
They aren't boy.
They work hard, they love the family, and unlike the Black Community the fathers stick around.
They are Catholic, they abhor the genocide we call abortion and they are a proud people.
 
Sex segregated facilities are an outdated relic of the Victoria era.

You're aware that 99% of the American voters STRONGLY disagree with that statement when it comes to bathrooms, showers, locker rooms etc?

No? How's the view from your padded cell?

You actually think that voters with daughters, sisters, wives, mothers, grandmothers & nieces are in FAVOR of deranged males going into areas where they are disrobing...without consequence? Legally? :lmao: Ever hear of the Target boycott?
Probably 99% of the voters oppose child marriages but that doesn't mean they will respond to political ads to stop it because it is a less important issue to them than jobs, terrorism, immigration, taxes, etc. Candidates have only so much money to spend on ads and voters have very limited attention spans when it comes to political ads. The advertising your proposing is a sure loser.

If you ask voters how worried they are about men in women's showers, most of them would think you were nuts as I do.
 
They used to be because they were a larger percentage of the population. But their decision to make enemies of large portions of the population has doomed them. Even on issues where many may agree with republicans, they still aren't going to vote for them.

That's a republican problem they created for themselves.

Economic being chief of those enemy-causing platforms. Reagan's "trickle down economics" is like how much of the Colorado River is left to Mexico when the hogs upstream are done tapping it. ie: NADA. Plus their push for NAFTA & the Pac. Rim thing. You screw the 99% for decades hard enough and you lose their support when they figure out who did it.

They could be getting back people on social issues though. That 99% number pops up again; this time in their favor if only they would carpe diem.
 
Probably 99% of the voters oppose child marriages but that doesn't mean they will respond to political ads to stop it because it is a less important issue to them than jobs, terrorism, immigration, taxes, etc.

Except the dems have already aligned themselves and have "made a command" from their Oval Office buddy to put deranged males directly into rooms for girls in schools where they are disrobing. This isn't theoretical. It's the dem platform. ie: it's HAPPENING, not something vague in the future that "is absurd, it will never happen". It's here.

And there cannot be an issue more immediate than imagining your daughter, mother, niece, sister, aunt, grandmother or granddaughter legally forced to disrobe in front of strange and mentally ill males behind doors marked "women". Target found out how manifest the opposition is when they lost $10 billion in share value literally overnight from miscalculating 1. the numbers who oppose that bullshit and 2. the STRENGTH to which they oppose it.

99% of people are GIGANTICALLY against this practice, this dem platform. The iron is hot. Time to strike it.
 
Very simple. Run ads in the contested states on gay marriage and men in women's showers. No other issue. Just the LGBT one..

LOL- oh GOP please follow Silhouette's most excellent plan......because that has been such a winning issue for you.....
 
Probably 99% of the voters oppose child marriages but that doesn't mean they will respond to political ads to stop it because it is a less important issue to them than jobs, terrorism, immigration, taxes, etc.

Except the dems have already aligned themselves and have "made a command" from their Oval Office buddy to put deranged males directly into rooms for girls in schools where they are disrobing. This isn't theoretical. It's the dem platform. ie: it's HAPPENING, not something vague in the future that "is absurd, it will never happen". It's here.

And there cannot be an issue more immediate than imagining your daughter, mother, niece, sister, aunt, grandmother or granddaughter legally forced to disrobe in front of strange and mentally ill males behind doors marked "women". Target found out how manifest the opposition is when they lost $10 billion in share value literally overnight from miscalculating 1. the numbers who oppose that bullshit and 2. the STRENGTH to which they oppose it.

99% of people are GIGANTICALLY against this practice, this dem platform. The iron is hot. Time to strike it.
We actually agree on one thing. I would certainly like to see Trump ads on TV about the Oval Office putting deranged males in schools to watch girls disrobe. I'm sure Colbert and SNL would have fun with that.
 
We actually agree on one thing. I would certainly like to see Trump ads on TV about the Oval Office putting deranged males in schools to watch girls disrobe. I'm sure Colbert and SNL would have fun with that.

What does Trump have to do with any stance against deranged men in women's restrooms? Remember, he came out publicly in FAVOR of that and says he allows it at Trump Tower as its official policy. SNL would have fun with it because they'd run the tape of Trump saying he was in favor, while at the same time trying to beat up Obama for it. Hence the problem the GOP has with Trump on their ticket.

And what amazes me is that they said nothing about that tape to Trump fans BEFORE the primaries had been finalized. They could've killed Trump's support by simply pointing that out to his supporters then. Now that Trump is predicted to lose handily to Hillary, the GOP has one more golden opportunity (and nothing but to gain) to coalesce its base by pointing out the flaw in the messiah. Whereas across all political affiliations the avid rejection of males in women's bathrooms and showers is running around 99%, in the Trumpee camp it's running 100%, STRONGLY opposed.

You'd think the GOP could put 2 + 2 together. The left is weak on the tranny issue. Very VERY weak. And they are relying on bluff to say or insinuate they would beat up the GOP or hurt their numbers in the election on yet another bogus "civil rights issue". The leftie dems know they have nothing but to lose if that issue was brought to the fore and championed by the GOP. 99% is a very large number. Any undecideds on down-ballot candidates red or blue would slip nicely over the fence into the red camp if they saw the GOP standing openly against it while the dems (would have to ) be forced to openly defend it.

I say, call their bluff. Put the issue right out on the table and call the dems to defend it publicly right now. And they can kiss millions of votes goodbye because of it.

But yeah...best to be cautious and not "rock the boat" at the 11th hour, right?
 
(smile) You don't know many Hispanics Sambo.
You think are just like you, lazy and stupid.
They aren't boy.
They work hard, they love the family, and unlike the Black Community the fathers stick around.
They are Catholic, they abhor the genocide we call abortion and they are a proud people.

I'm pretty sure they don't like men in the bathrooms with their daughters and wives. Probably running around 100%
 
Still waiting on Syriusly to explain how trannies are "gay"?

Keep waiting- I never said that they were.

Very simple. Run ads in the contested states on gay marriage and men in women's showers.

As I said before- just another in a long line of Silhouette attacking Americans who happen to be gay.
 
Very simple. Run ads in the contested states on gay marriage and men in women's showers.
Yes, remind all minorities just how much the Republican party HATES them.

Brilliant plan.
The mentally ill are indeed (hopefully) a minority. Yet their illness must not intrude into women's bathrooms and showers. So say 99% of all registered voters....across the political spectrum. Visit post #2 for details.
 

Forum List

Back
Top