The Worst?? Move Over, Carter and Buchanan!!

[AntonToo]

[Are you listening, Obama???]

Holy fuck are you crazy.

No silly, I can assure you he is not listening to your little internetz rantz.

 

[surada]

Obama spent years swearing no nuke for Iran....and the Liberals yelled 'atta boy'!!!

Obama gives Iran the green light, and $billions....and the Liberals yelled 'atta boy'!!!



June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...bc1fce-071d-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_print.html


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon

Trump wrecked the nuclear agreement with Iran.

As for AIPAC...

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte Profile: Summary

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte organization profile. Contributions in the 2024 cycle: $42,798,107. Lobbying in 2024: $2,414,315. Outside Spending in the 2024 cycle: $0.

www.opensecrets.org

Compared to Teachers Unions Summary

 

[surada]

1. As you know....I never lie.

2. Your posts...because you're so dumb, prove useful in advancing my perspective.

Watch.

"Pushing the lie that the Democratic Party of today is anything like the Democratic Party of the past..."

a. Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising George Bush's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives suddenly decided to become racists.


b. If that's not enough....the most popular Democrat today, Bill 'the rapist' Clinton, was a racist his entire political life....
This from 2008:

Bill Clinton made insensitive ‘race jab’ about Obama in 2008
“A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”
Bill Clinton made insensitive ‘race jab’ about Obama in 2008 | New York Post



Yup....same Democrat party that created the KKK.

There was no law after the civil war .

 

[Meathead]

your idea of "worst" is based on partisan hackery.

the worst, to date, is baby bush.

but he's already been eclipsed by the orange sociopath.

The irony of your post most likely escapes you.

 

[surada]

The irony of your post most likely escapes you.

What are the chances that Crooked Joe Biden, the WORST President in the history of the U.S., whose Presidency was Unconstitutionally STOLEN from him by Kamabla, Barrack HUSSEIN Obama, Crazy Nancy Pelosi, Shifty Adam Schiff, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, and others on the Lunatic Left, CRASHES the Democrat National Convention and tries to take back the Nomination, beginning with challenging me to another DEBATE,” Trump wrote.

Trump’s top two campaign aides, Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles, did not respond to HuffPost queries about the new insult. The two were hired to give the coup-attempting, convicted criminal former president a more focused, more professional operation than he had in either 2016 or 2020.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was no law after the civil war .

And once again we find an enemy of America and Americans doing what they are trained to do: lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump wrecked the nuclear agreement with Iran.

As for AIPAC...

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte Profile: Summary

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte organization profile. Contributions in the 2024 cycle: $42,798,107. Lobbying in 2024: $2,414,315. Outside Spending in the 2024 cycle: $0.

www.opensecrets.org

Compared to Teachers Unions Summary

Agreement????

With 7th century savages??????????

Nay, nay, there was simply a plan by the party that hates America, Americans, and all of
Western Civilization to make certain tht the 7th century savages are nuclear armed so they can assault the bastion of democracy in the Middle East.


Obama was strengthening his Islamic roots in opposition to Israel.

 

[citygator]

Lol this thread didnt age well.

History will reflect that:

• Obama was a top 10 president
• Biden will be a top 15 president
• Trump will end up in the bottom 3

This echo chamber can post whatever it wants but history is written by historians and there is nothing you can do but look back in 20 years and wonder WTF you all were thinking. Your kids will read about this period and hope that you werent maga nuts.

 

[Mac1958]

Lol this thread didnt age well.

Well, the hysterical rantings of wannabe partisan pundits usually don't.

 

[Meathead]

There was no law after the civil war .

Then how were the slaves freed dingbat?

 

[jc456]

Trump wrecked the nuclear agreement with Iran.

good thing.

As for AIPAC...

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte Profile: Summary

American Israel Public Affairs Cmte organization profile. Contributions in the 2024 cycle: $42,798,107. Lobbying in 2024: $2,414,315. Outside Spending in the 2024 cycle: $0.

www.opensecrets.org

Compared to Teachers Unions Summary

Teachers unions, hahaahahahahahahahahaha