There Is A Difference Between Heated Rhetoric And Incitement To Violence

[San Souci]

This is heated rhetoric:





This is incitement to violence.






This isn't freedom of speech. This doesn't fall under the protection of the 1st Amendment.

Greta Thornbird is a retard. Who cares what that Spaz says?

 

[mudwhistle]

Greta Thornbird is a retard. Who cares what that Spaz says?

Yes, but she made a good illustration for the OP.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

.

Poor baby.


.

 

[martybegan]

This is heated rhetoric:





This is incitement to violence.






This isn't freedom of speech. This doesn't fall under the protection of the 1st Amendment.

The thing is incitement is a specific crime. The person has to specifically say "Go kill X, Go destroy Y"

Trying to lower the incitement bar is what they wanted to do to Trump.

The key to dealing with these shits is to prosecute them properly when they do something illegal, and prosecute only for the illegal act.

Don't give them any political cover.

 

[San Souci]

.

Poor baby.


.

Hopefully that racist Pig gets fired.

 

[mudwhistle]

The thing is incitement is a specific crime. The person has to specifically say "Go kill X, Go destroy Y"

Trying to lower the incitement bar is what they wanted to do to Trump.

The key to dealing with these shits is to prosecute them properly when they do something illegal, and prosecute only for the illegal act.

Don't give them any political cover.

Seems to me the media is trying to raise the bar on what an incitement is......because they have called for riots and insurrection on MSNBC and CNN. They've even said someone needs to shoot Trump and other Republicans.

 

[martybegan]

Seems to me the media is trying to raise the bar on what an incitement is......because they have called for riots and insurrection on MSNBC and CNN. They've even said someone needs to shoot Trump and other Republicans.

What they are doing is trying to set the bar where it was before they tried to lower it to get Trump.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Seems to me the media is trying to raise the bar on what an incitement is......because they have called for riots and insurrection on MSNBC and CNN. They've even said someone needs to shoot Trump and other Republicans.

.

There's a leftist here -- don't remember who because they're not that important -- who is on the side of the shooter because they believe that, when we simply refuse to do what they want, it's called a failure of communication -- or whatever -- and thus validates violence.

It's time to be ready, y'all. The "media" and the leftist shooter are saying very loudly and clearly that they are going to turn things violent. They just want to try to keep it subtle so they can say we started it.

Is that going to work?

The shooting has started.


.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

.

Bring the tantrums, children. We are ready this time. We got sucker-punched in 2020, but we've got plenty of situational awareness and ammo this time around!


.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

.

Bring the tantrums, children. We are ready this time. We got sucker-punched in 2020, but we've got plenty of situational awareness and ammo this time around!


.

BREAKING: Newly Discovered Connection Between Nancy Pelosi & Luigi Mangione Raises Questions In UnitedHealth CEO Murder InvestigationKey Points• Cyberattack Timeline: A major cyberattack on UnitedHealth Group in February 2024 coincided with Paul Pelosi's $4 million investment in Palo Alto Networks, which later investigated the breach.• UnitedHealth CEO's Death: Brian Thompson, UnitedHealth CEO, was murdered shortly before he was set to testify in a DOJ case that could have implicated Nancy Pelosi in insider trading.• Luigi Mangione's Role: Luigi Mangione, a tech-savvy scion of a wealthy Maryland family with historical ties to the D’Alesandro family (Nancy Pelosi), was arrested in connection with Thompson's death.• Potential Insider Trading: Speculation suggests the cyberattack could have been orchestrated to facilitate insider trading benefiting the Pelosi family.• Pelosi/Mangione Family Ties: Nicholas Mangione, Luigi's grandfather, had ties to Thomas D’Alesandro Jr., Nancy Pelosi’s father, raising questions about long- standing family connections.When it comes to the intersection of power, influence, and corruption, nothing surprises us anymore. But the unfolding saga around Luigi Mangione, Nancy Pelosi, and UnitedHealth Group's cyberattack is a story that raises every eyebrow and begs serious questions. Is there a connection between the tech-savvy scion of a wealthy Maryland family, a devastating cyberattack, and what could be one of the most intricate insider trading scandals in modern history?Let’s break it down.The Timeline of IntrigueIn February 2024, UnitedHealth Group, one of the largest private insurers in the United States, suffered a catastrophic cyberattack. On the exact same day, Paul Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi's husband, made a curious financial move: purchasing $4 million in call options for Palo Alto Networks, a leading cybersecurity firm. Shortly after, Palo Alto Networks was chosen to investigate the breach. Coincidence? Perhaps. But the timing is eyebrow-raising, to say the least.As the fallout unfolded, UnitedHealth Group was left grappling with a $2.3 billion response bill, a tarnished reputation, and data breaches impacting one-third of Americans. Among those reportedly affected by the cyberattack was Brian Thompson, UnitedHealth’s CEO, who was scheduled to testify before the Department of Justice regarding potential insider trading allegations that could have implicated Pelosi.Enter Luigi MangioneLuigi Mangione, a computer science graduate from the University of Pennsylvania and the grandson of Nicholas Mangione—a man with well-documented ties to Pelosi’s father, Thomas D’Alesandro Jr.—is no stranger to controversy. While Luigi has largely remained in the shadow of his family’s business empire, his technical expertise and access to wealth raise questions about his potential role in this high-stakes drama.Luigi was arrested in December 2024 in connection with the murder of Brian Thompson, just weeks before the CEO was set to testify. While authorities have focused on the immediate crime, the broader context suggests a potential motive linked to protecting powerful individuals. Could Luigi Mangione have been part of a coordinated effort to silence Thompson and shield Pelosi from insider trading accusations?The Insider Trading AngleThe sequence of events involving the Pelosi's and Palo Alto Networks smells of insider trading. Yet, as always, there’s plausible deniability. Nancy Pelosi’s defenders argue that Paul Pelosi’s investments are independent of her legislative role, but critics see this as a convenient shield. Luigi Mangione’s potential involvement in the cyberattack and subsequent events adds another layer of intrigue.The Pattern of PowerLet’s not forget that this isn’t the first time Pelosi’s name has been linked to ethically questionable dealings. From stock market timing to her legislative influence on industries where her family has investments, the Pelosi machine has always operated at the edge of what’s legal and ethical. Add Luigi Mangione to the mix—a tech-savvy grandson of a family connected to the D’Alesandros—and you have all the ingredients for a scandal that could rival any Washington thriller.Questions That Demand AnswersIf there’s nothing to hide, why did UnitedHealth's CEO end up dead before his DOJ testimony? Why did Paul Pelosi make a $4 million bet on the very cybersecurity firm that ended up investigating the attack? Is this a case of random coincidence, or are we witnessing the makings of one of the most explosive political and financial conspiracies in modern history? Only time will tell, but one thing is clear: when it comes to the Pelosi dynasty, there’s always more to the story.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

When the media starts supporting assassins you know it's a Deep State hit.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]