They capped another one. South LA wil be on flames. Of course, he was a Good Boy.

[Canon Shooter]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

 

[Rambunctious]

This one had a gun.....an illegal stolen gun and stolen bike and he punched a cop.....don't blame the sheriff deputy...blame the man with the gun....

 

[Rambunctious]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

You are misinformed...he dropped the clothes but not the gun....

 

[MACAULAY]

Trump runs California. Obviously it's his fault.

 

[John T. Ford]

Not a good idea to try to run a deputy over.

It can earn ONE a Darwin Award.

It doesn't matter anymore. Every black thug shot will cost 10's of millions to each city. Not to mention the Ghetto Lotto pay out to the family high fiving each other..

Only in the Blue run Shithole cities

 

[Turtlesoup]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

It is likely lib media propaganda---meant to drum up the violence for the dems. The dems cant' win without blacks voting and not just voting but voting in repeatedly and terrorizing other voters...likely what happened despite the media's wording which is no mistake but done by design..........They pulled over guy, guy attacked cops, and cops seen GUN on guy so they shot. The media is tossing the guy was shot before the gun was seen but it is likely the opposite.

 

[Rambunctious]

The left doesn't want riots in CA because they have their boy in the governors seat here and they want him to run for president in 2024....so they have kept a lid on the violence in CA...that should tell everyone who is coordinating this whole thing...the DNC.....

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

This one had a gun.....an illegal stolen gun and stolen bike and he punched a cop.....don't blame the sheriff deputy...blame the man with the gun....

If they shot a FBI's top 10 wanted Negro list, it doesn't matter.

 

[Canon Shooter]

The media is tossing the guy was shot before the gun was seen but it is likely the opposite.

Did you read the article that was linked to? It clearly stated that police saw the gun after he dropped a pile of clothes he was carrying and that's when they opened fire...

 

[Canon Shooter]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

You are misinformed...he dropped the clothes but not the gun....

Directly from the linked article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man. "

I'm just going by what I read.

If you have something which states the contrary, I'm more than happy to read it...

 

[Jackson]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

You are misinformed...he dropped the clothes but not the gun....

Directly from the linked article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man. "

I'm just going by what I read.

If you have something which states the contrary, I'm more than happy to read it...

Still not sure. Was the gun mixed in with the pile of clothes or was he holding the gun under the pile of clothes. If they saw him holding the gun, there was no question it was a good kill.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

Lib media is writing the story----they have repeatedly lied and spun stories trying on purpose to fuel the riots ...

Logic dictates since this story makes no sense and the lib media has a history of this nonsense that this story will turn out to be the same exact emotional manipulation chit by the media but by then we will only see a small blip about it and the rioters will have burned the city down.

Its the soros, socialist, communist lib media way...lie and spin chit to try pin their crimes on others

 

[Canon Shooter]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

Lib media is writing the story----they have repeatedly lied and spun stories trying on purpose to fuel the riots ...

Logic dictates since this story makes no sense and the lib media has a history of this nonsense that this story will turn out to be the same exact emotional manipulation chit by the media but by then we will only see a small blip about it and the rioters will have burned the city down.

Its the soros, socialist, communist lib media way...lie and spin chit to try pin their crimes on others

It was the police officers who stated that the gun was in the bundle of clothes. A liberal media outlet repeating that doesn't make it untrue...

 

[Canon Shooter]

Tough one.

This is another isolated example of a cops shooting an unarmed black guy. This situation, however, was exacerbated by the fact that the dead guy punched one of the cops, which escalates the entire affair.

The police say they found a gun in a pile of clothes the man had dropped. The way the article reads, the police used that as their reason to open fire. I have a hard time believing that. Clearly the guy felt he had to run. Maybe he didn't want the police finding him to be in possession of an illegal firearm (assuming it was). But taking a swing at a police officer is definitely what ramped this situation up...

No, he grabbed the gun obviously............wonder what crimes that he was using it in.

I guess you're reading a different article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man."

There's no indication at all that the guy reached for the gun...

You are misinformed...he dropped the clothes but not the gun....

Directly from the linked article:

"In doing so, the man dropped a bundle of clothing he had been carrying. The deputies spotted a black handgun in the bundle, Dean said, and both opened fire, killing the man. "

I'm just going by what I read.

If you have something which states the contrary, I'm more than happy to read it...

Still not sure. Was the gun mixed in with the pile of clothes or was he holding the gun under the pile of clothes. If they saw him holding the gun, there was no question it was a good kill.

I absolutely agree with you about the fact that it would be a good kill.

But the gun, apparently, was in among the clothes that the guy dropped, and it was only after he dropped that bundle of clothes did the cops see the gun in that bundle of clothes.

Like I said earlier, I'm happy to read anything that being reported to the contrary...

 

[blastoff]

They should move the rioting, burning, looting and whatnot to a neutral site this go-round. Nearby Malibu comes to mind...

 

[B. Kidd]

Not a good idea to try to run a deputy over.

It can earn ONE a Darwin Award.

It doesn't matter anymore. Every black thug shot will cost 10's of millions to each city. Not to mention the Ghetto Lotto pay out to the family high fiving each other..

Whack-a-mole never paid off this good!

 

[22lcidw]

Here we blow up again.

Fatal shooting of Black man by L.A. County sheriff's deputies sparks protests and questions

L.A. County sheriff's deputies fatally shot a man Monday afternoon in the Westmont neighborhood of South Los Angeles, the department said.

www.latimes.com

Too bad the terrorist Kyle got himself arrested for murder. He could have had a ball in LA and won praise from Scumpty.

Remember........go to Beverly Hills and burn down the mansions. They won't mind.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Here we blow up again.

Fatal shooting of Black man by L.A. County sheriff's deputies sparks protests and questions

L.A. County sheriff's deputies fatally shot a man Monday afternoon in the Westmont neighborhood of South Los Angeles, the department said.

www.latimes.com

Too bad the terrorist Kyle got himself arrested for murder. He could have had a ball in LA and won praise from Scumpty.

Well. He would have been murdered anyway by the thugs. But we know how happy you would be if that happened.

Watch this folks.............................