Almost ALL your evidence comes from a single source that I have proven is unreliable. The remaining evidence is second or third and also unreliable.It has nothing to do with supernatural acts witnessed by the first Christians or the fact that non-Christian historians recorded that the early Christians worshiped Jesus. That's the pertinent evidence. And what you are arguing doesn't discredit those facts. Whatever the early Christians believed about his origin narrative was baked into their belief that Jesus was God. Witnessing supernatural acts carries a lot of weight.
This is just another red herring of yours so you can dismiss the only evidence that we have. And you have still never crafted an alternate narrative that address the evidence that exists. And the reason for that is because there's not one that exists except Jesus is God.