Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's saying the first amendment protects you RWNJ liars and propagandists.
And it does to a certain extent.
Not seeing what your problem is here.
Several on the left have signaled how the Constitution is getting in the way of the leftist agenda. I'm pretty sure that is part of the game plan if the leftist deep state is successful in seizing power in all of government.
John Kerry on the First Amendment as a problem:
And then there is this:
Yep. Their consistent dishonesty and not utilizing due process in their weaponization of government against political opponents pretty much is a declaration of immunity from that.which part of the constitution do you like the most?:
]
'[m fond of seperation of powers, checks and balances, and all equal under the law. separation of church and state is nice
have the democrats claimed some sort of immunity from that?
I know and you know he wasn't referring to the MSM though.He is not wrong. That is the very mechanism that the main stream media uses to insulate themselves from having to pay a consequence for their lies.
No, but in fact, that is who it does apply to.I know and you know he wasn't referring to the MSM though.
He was simply saying in his own Trumpish way that the Constitution inadvertently was protecting a false and fraudulent election. And, if the election was false and fraudulent--many millions of Americans still believe it was--the Constitution indeed did do that.
I can't disagree. And the problem is that for decades now, the Marxist left has been infiltrating as much of the media and other sources of general message as they can including all popular search engines. So not only can media be as dishonest as it chooses with impunity, the search engines mostly remove or suppress all sources that would expose that.No, but in fact, that is who it does apply to.
Ironic that BlindBoo supports your position.Not seeing what your problem is here.
Hey, he's just following a trend you set. Nice try though.
I'm assuming--okay I hope--this is sarcasm?So long as democracy is saved so you have the ability to vote for a clown in the clown show, what do you care?
But that is not even close to the reality of the 2020 election. There has never been any proof presented in the courts that hinted at the massive multi-state fraud that Benedict Donald claims. If you want to throw out the law and order and the courts then you are advocating for a lawless society.the Constitution inadvertently was protecting a false and fraudulent election.
Contrary to known realityAnd ultimately in this case doing the wrong thing but upholding the Constitution resulted in a substantial majority of Americans not trusting our elections.
www.ap.org
At the end of the day it is not the First Amendment that is the problem but a corrupted legal system that no longer enforces libel and slander laws and an electorate that mostly doesn't seem to notice or care how much information is disallowed or suppressed.The First Amendment has blown past all rational bounds, and along with NYT v Sullivan and general Leftist culture (in which lies and distortions in furtherance of a desired political end are acceptable, and indeed mandatory) have perverted the rational exchange of ideas into a falsehood and slander-laden shooting gallery.
The ideal of "free speech" cannot be beneficial in such an environment.
The text..."Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech..." was merely intended to prevent Congress from criminalizing the criticism of government or its elected officials.
Dems set the trend. Don't be surprised when their opponents start playing their game.Dang those Dems!
Nothing in your post contradicts what I said.But that is not even close to the reality of the 2020 election. There has never been any proof presented in the courts that hinted at the massive multi-state fraud that Benedict Donald claims. If you want to throw out the law and order and the courts then you are advocating for a lawless society.
Contrary to known reality
The recent findings from the AP-NORC survey show that a significant chunk of Trump’s supporters might be more inclined to believe what he says about the upcoming election results than they are to trust government certifications of election results.
About two-thirds of Republicans trust Trump’s campaign at least a moderate amount to provide accurate information about the results of the 2024 election, while only about half say the same about the official certifications of results, the survey found. By contrast, about 9 in 10 Democrats trust the government certification at least a moderate amount, and an overwhelming majority, 82%, also have at least a moderate amount of trust in Harris and her campaign.
Most Americans — around 7 in 10 — trust the government certifications of election results at least a moderate amount, according to the survey. Majorities also trust national and local TV news networks, as well as local or national newspapers, to provide accurate information about the outcome of this year’s presidential election.
AP-NORC/USAFacts poll: Republicans are more likely to trust Trump than official election results | The Associated Press
CHICAGO (AP) — For Christopher Pugh, the 2020 election was a turning point. He already distrusted the government. But as he watched Fox
See Post #26Dang those Dems!
Hey, he's just following a trend you set. Nice try though.
What is ironic about it? The Amendment allows the press to be a bias as they want. Our history of nasty ass campaigning goes back to the first election after George Washington stepped down. No where in the constitution does it say that the press is considered or has to be the arbiter of absolute truth and honesty. That's freedom for you. You are free to believe whatever the fuck you want to believe. Buyer beware.Ironic that BlindBoo supports your position.
Several on the left have signaled how the Constitution is getting in the way of the leftist agenda. I'm pretty sure doing away with troublesome parts of the Constitution or maybe all of it is part of the game plan if the leftist deep state is successful in seizing power in all of government.
John Kerry on the First Amendment as a problem:
And then there is this:
