🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

This Day in History: Massacre of 20,000 in Syria

Pogo

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2012
123,708
22,748
2,190
Fennario
On this date in 1098, the First Crusade broke through the defenses of the city of Maarat (or Ma'arra) in what is now Syria, first negotiating a surrender, then slaughtering twenty thousand inhabitants, then eating them.

The defenders of the city, mostly an urban militia and inexperienced citizens, managed to hold off the attacks for about two weeks. The crusaders spent this time building a siege tower, which allowed them to pour over the walls of the city, while at the same time a group of knights scaled the undefended walls on the other side of the city.

The crusaders occupied the walls on December 11. The Muslims retreated into the city, and both sides prepared to rest for the night, but the poorer crusaders rushed through and plundered Maarat. On the morning of December 12, the garrison negotiated with Bohemond, who promised them safe conduct if they surrendered. The Muslims surrendered, but the crusaders immediately began to massacre the population. Meanwhile, Bohemond seized control of the walls and towers while Raymond of Toulouse took control of the interior of the city, continuing their dispute over who would rule conquered territories.

Maarat was not as rich as the crusaders had hoped and they were still short of supplies and food as December progressed. Most of the soldiers and knights preferred to continue the march to Jerusalem, caring little for the political dispute between Bohemond and Raymond, and Raymond tried to buy the support of the other leaders. While the leaders negotiated away from the city, some of the starving crusaders at Maarat reportedly resorted to cannibalism, feeding on the dead bodies of Muslims.

A chronicler, Radulph of Caen wrote (in 1107, 9 years after the fact):

Some people said that, constrained by the lack of food, they boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots, impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled.

These events were also chronicled by Fulcher of Chartres, who wrote:

I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth.[1]

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -- George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)
 
Yes it is nice that the far left can cut and paste stuff, but they continue to show they do not understand history..

Explain.

Explain what? That you do not understand history?

This far left narrative thread shows it without any need for explanation..

It is just a part of the far left narrative so you can continue your support for ISIS without question or hesitation.
 
Well done, Crusaders. Well done
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Learn your history, if you don't know the Crusades were the direct result of Muslim aggression in Europe you have ZERO business posting on the matter
 
Well done, Crusaders. Well done
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Learn your history, if you don't know the Crusades were the direct result of Muslim aggression in Europe you have ZERO business posting on the matter

So you don't have one. Because it doesn't exist.

Still waiting on the technology that lets you link your own anal canal. I understand Windows 11 will have it.
 
Well done, Crusaders. Well done
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Learn your history, if you don't know the Crusades were the direct result of Muslim aggression in Europe you have ZERO business posting on the matter

So you don't have one.

Still waiting on the technology that lets you link your own anal canal.

Nope,I don't play you daffy left loon game of links. Get off your ass and learn your own history....it's obvious on this matter you are clueless.
 
On this date in 1098, the First Crusade broke through the defenses of the city of Maarat (or Ma'arra) in what is now Syria, first negotiating a surrender, then slaughtering twenty thousand inhabitants, then eating them.

The defenders of the city, mostly an urban militia and inexperienced citizens, managed to hold off the attacks for about two weeks. The crusaders spent this time building a siege tower, which allowed them to pour over the walls of the city, while at the same time a group of knights scaled the undefended walls on the other side of the city.

The crusaders occupied the walls on December 11. The Muslims retreated into the city, and both sides prepared to rest for the night, but the poorer crusaders rushed through and plundered Maarat. On the morning of December 12, the garrison negotiated with Bohemond, who promised them safe conduct if they surrendered. The Muslims surrendered, but the crusaders immediately began to massacre the population. Meanwhile, Bohemond seized control of the walls and towers while Raymond of Toulouse took control of the interior of the city, continuing their dispute over who would rule conquered territories.

Maarat was not as rich as the crusaders had hoped and they were still short of supplies and food as December progressed. Most of the soldiers and knights preferred to continue the march to Jerusalem, caring little for the political dispute between Bohemond and Raymond, and Raymond tried to buy the support of the other leaders. While the leaders negotiated away from the city, some of the starving crusaders at Maarat reportedly resorted to cannibalism, feeding on the dead bodies of Muslims.

A chronicler, Radulph of Caen wrote (in 1107, 9 years after the fact):

Some people said that, constrained by the lack of food, they boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots, impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled.

These events were also chronicled by Fulcher of Chartres, who wrote:

I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth.[1]

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -- George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)










Reaching back ONE THOUSAND years for Christian atrocities to try and rationalize the atrocities being committed by Muslims today is retarded. And desperate as hell....
 
Well done, Crusaders. Well done
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Seriously you want a link?

IS that how desperate you are to run your narrative?

Next you will want a link to prove water exists..
 
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Learn your history, if you don't know the Crusades were the direct result of Muslim aggression in Europe you have ZERO business posting on the matter

So you don't have one.

Still waiting on the technology that lets you link your own anal canal.

Nope,I don't play you daffy left loon game of links. Get off your ass and learn your own history....it's obvious on this matter you are clueless.

So you don't have one. Because you're making it up.

Yeah I already noted that.

Why would they be going all the way to Palestine ---- if the theater of war had been in Europe? Oopsie.

>> The heart of Western Europe had been stabilized after the Christianization of the Saxon, Viking, and Hungarian peoples by the end of the 10th century. However, the breakdown of the Carolingian Empire gave rise to an entire class of warriors who now had little to do but fight among themselves.[11] The random violence of the knightly class was regularly condemned by the church, and in response it established the Peace and Truce of God to prohibit fighting on certain days of the year. At the same time, the reform-minded papacy came into conflict with the Holy Roman Emperors, resulting in the Investiture Controversy. Popes such as Gregory VII justified the subsequent warfare against the Emperor's partisans in theological terms. It became acceptable for the Pope to utilize knights in the name of Christendom, not only against political enemies of the Papacy, but also against Al-Andalus, or, theoretically, against the Seljuq dynasty in the east.[12]

To the east of Europe lay the Byzantine Empire, composed of Christians who had long followed a separate Orthodox rite; the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches had been in schism since 1054. Historians have argued that the desire to impose Roman church authority in the east may have been one of the goals of the crusade,[13] although Urban II, who launched the First Crusade, never refers to such a goal in his letters on crusading. The Seljuq Turks had taken over almost all of Anatolia after the Byzantine defeat at the Battle of Manzikert in 1071; however, their conquests were piecemeal and led by semi-independent warlords, rather than by the sultan. A dramatic collapse of the empire's position on the eve of the Council of Clermont brought Byzantium to the brink of disaster.[14] By the mid-1090s, the Byzantine Empire was largely confined to Balkan Europe and the northwestern fringe of Anatolia, and faced Norman enemies in the west as well as Turks in the east.[15] In response to the defeat at Manzikert and subsequent Byzantine losses in Anatolia in 1074, Pope Gregory VII had called for the milites Christi ("soldiers of Christ") to go to Byzantium's aid. This call was largely ignored and even opposed.[16] The reason for this was that while the defeat at Manzikert was shocking, it had limited significance and did not lead to major difficulties for the Byzantine empire, at least in the short term.[17] << --- First Crusade: Situation in Europe


Political rivalry between two nexuses of the institutions that held the most popular influence in that time: Religion. Competition between Coke and Pepsi for customers. What? Pepsi has a market way over there? Go get it!
 
On this date in 1098, the First Crusade broke through the defenses of the city of Maarat (or Ma'arra) in what is now Syria, first negotiating a surrender, then slaughtering twenty thousand inhabitants, then eating them.

The defenders of the city, mostly an urban militia and inexperienced citizens, managed to hold off the attacks for about two weeks. The crusaders spent this time building a siege tower, which allowed them to pour over the walls of the city, while at the same time a group of knights scaled the undefended walls on the other side of the city.

The crusaders occupied the walls on December 11. The Muslims retreated into the city, and both sides prepared to rest for the night, but the poorer crusaders rushed through and plundered Maarat. On the morning of December 12, the garrison negotiated with Bohemond, who promised them safe conduct if they surrendered. The Muslims surrendered, but the crusaders immediately began to massacre the population. Meanwhile, Bohemond seized control of the walls and towers while Raymond of Toulouse took control of the interior of the city, continuing their dispute over who would rule conquered territories.

Maarat was not as rich as the crusaders had hoped and they were still short of supplies and food as December progressed. Most of the soldiers and knights preferred to continue the march to Jerusalem, caring little for the political dispute between Bohemond and Raymond, and Raymond tried to buy the support of the other leaders. While the leaders negotiated away from the city, some of the starving crusaders at Maarat reportedly resorted to cannibalism, feeding on the dead bodies of Muslims.

A chronicler, Radulph of Caen wrote (in 1107, 9 years after the fact):

Some people said that, constrained by the lack of food, they boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots, impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled.

These events were also chronicled by Fulcher of Chartres, who wrote:

I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth.[1]

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -- George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)


Reaching back ONE THOUSAND years for Christian atrocities to try and rationalize the atrocities being committed by Muslims today is retarded. And desperate as hell....


And where does the OP do that, hm?

:eusa_whistle:


impatient.gif



Did the event not happen on this date in history?
Is this not the History forum?

Shut the fuck up then.
 
Well done, Crusaders. Well done
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Seriously you want a link?

IS that how desperate you are to run your narrative?

Next you will want a link to prove water exists..

So you don't have one either. Unfortunately I do.

Next....
 
Well done, Crusaders. Well done
You're one sick fuck.

Why? Because the Muslims invaded Europe, tortured, raped and pillaged until finally the Christians said enough and kicked their asses? Learn some history you dweeb and then comment.

Link?

Seriously you want a link?

IS that how desperate you are to run your narrative?

Next you will want a link to prove water exists..

So you don't have one either. Unfortunately I do.

Next....

See the far left drones post bunk and then want you to prove them wrong!

Typical far left drone running their religious narratives without question or hesitation..
 
On this date in 1098, the First Crusade broke through the defenses of the city of Maarat (or Ma'arra) in what is now Syria, first negotiating a surrender, then slaughtering twenty thousand inhabitants, then eating them.

The defenders of the city, mostly an urban militia and inexperienced citizens, managed to hold off the attacks for about two weeks. The crusaders spent this time building a siege tower, which allowed them to pour over the walls of the city, while at the same time a group of knights scaled the undefended walls on the other side of the city.

The crusaders occupied the walls on December 11. The Muslims retreated into the city, and both sides prepared to rest for the night, but the poorer crusaders rushed through and plundered Maarat. On the morning of December 12, the garrison negotiated with Bohemond, who promised them safe conduct if they surrendered. The Muslims surrendered, but the crusaders immediately began to massacre the population. Meanwhile, Bohemond seized control of the walls and towers while Raymond of Toulouse took control of the interior of the city, continuing their dispute over who would rule conquered territories.

Maarat was not as rich as the crusaders had hoped and they were still short of supplies and food as December progressed. Most of the soldiers and knights preferred to continue the march to Jerusalem, caring little for the political dispute between Bohemond and Raymond, and Raymond tried to buy the support of the other leaders. While the leaders negotiated away from the city, some of the starving crusaders at Maarat reportedly resorted to cannibalism, feeding on the dead bodies of Muslims.

A chronicler, Radulph of Caen wrote (in 1107, 9 years after the fact):

Some people said that, constrained by the lack of food, they boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots, impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled.

These events were also chronicled by Fulcher of Chartres, who wrote:

I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth.[1]

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -- George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)


Reaching back ONE THOUSAND years for Christian atrocities to try and rationalize the atrocities being committed by Muslims today is retarded. And desperate as hell....


And where does the OP do that, hm?

:eusa_whistle:


impatient.gif



Did the event not happen on this date in history?
Is this not the History forum?

Shut the fuck up then.







Funny you didn't mention the 12/12 1983 Kuwait bombings which lookey there also happened on this date. Granted they only killed 6 people but that was due to incompetence on the part of the terrorists.
 
On this date in 1098, the First Crusade broke through the defenses of the city of Maarat (or Ma'arra) in what is now Syria, first negotiating a surrender, then slaughtering twenty thousand inhabitants, then eating them.

The defenders of the city, mostly an urban militia and inexperienced citizens, managed to hold off the attacks for about two weeks. The crusaders spent this time building a siege tower, which allowed them to pour over the walls of the city, while at the same time a group of knights scaled the undefended walls on the other side of the city.

The crusaders occupied the walls on December 11. The Muslims retreated into the city, and both sides prepared to rest for the night, but the poorer crusaders rushed through and plundered Maarat. On the morning of December 12, the garrison negotiated with Bohemond, who promised them safe conduct if they surrendered. The Muslims surrendered, but the crusaders immediately began to massacre the population. Meanwhile, Bohemond seized control of the walls and towers while Raymond of Toulouse took control of the interior of the city, continuing their dispute over who would rule conquered territories.

Maarat was not as rich as the crusaders had hoped and they were still short of supplies and food as December progressed. Most of the soldiers and knights preferred to continue the march to Jerusalem, caring little for the political dispute between Bohemond and Raymond, and Raymond tried to buy the support of the other leaders. While the leaders negotiated away from the city, some of the starving crusaders at Maarat reportedly resorted to cannibalism, feeding on the dead bodies of Muslims.

A chronicler, Radulph of Caen wrote (in 1107, 9 years after the fact):

Some people said that, constrained by the lack of food, they boiled pagan adults in cooking-pots, impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled.

These events were also chronicled by Fulcher of Chartres, who wrote:

I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth.[1]

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” -- George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)


Reaching back ONE THOUSAND years for Christian atrocities to try and rationalize the atrocities being committed by Muslims today is retarded. And desperate as hell....


And where does the OP do that, hm?

:eusa_whistle:


impatient.gif



Did the event not happen on this date in history?
Is this not the History forum?

Shut the fuck up then.

Funny you didn't mention the 12/12 1983 Kuwait bombings which lookey there also happened on this date. Granted they only killed 6 people but that was due to incompetence on the part of the terrorists.

Oh yeah that was YUUUUGE. So Yuge the Wiki page on this date doesn't even list it. Nor did you, which is understandable given their YUUUGE significance.

Funny I also didn't link Pennsylvania becoming the second state to ratify the Constitution (1787) even though that's my birth state, or Gugliemo Marconi receiving the first TransAtlantic radio signal on Signal Hill Newfoundland (1901) even though radio's my career. I picked an event that has more immediate contemporary relevance to the general public.

So sue me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top