Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Consigning. Tandoori Shrimp is my favorite.
Butter Chicken. I would eat it every day if I could.
I've had that too...good stuff. If the place you go to offers Chicken Tikka with Jasmine Rice, try that. It's addictive.
Butter Chicken. I would eat it every day if I could.
I've had that too...good stuff. If the place you go to offers Chicken Tikka with Jasmine Rice, try that. It's addictive.
Chicken Tikka Masala? I've had that too. I actually have the recipe and the spices but I'm the only one in the family that likes to eat East Indian food. The Senegalese make something very similar tasting in Chicken Curry with rice and beans. I ate a lot of that when I visited Senegal.
I've had that too...good stuff. If the place you go to offers Chicken Tikka with Jasmine Rice, try that. It's addictive.
Chicken Tikka Masala? I've had that too. I actually have the recipe and the spices but I'm the only one in the family that likes to eat East Indian food. The Senegalese make something very similar tasting in Chicken Curry with rice and beans. I ate a lot of that when I visited Senegal.
I didn't know it was popular there too.
Chicken Tikka Masala? I've had that too. I actually have the recipe and the spices but I'm the only one in the family that likes to eat East Indian food. The Senegalese make something very similar tasting in Chicken Curry with rice and beans. I ate a lot of that when I visited Senegal.
I didn't know it was popular there too.
If you knew the similarities between India and Africa it would blow you away. The Ganges river is named after the Ethiopian King Ganges. They even worshipped Black gods before they became Aryan.
Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.I didn't know it was popular there too.
If you knew the similarities between India and Africa it would blow you away. The Ganges river is named after the Ethiopian King Ganges. They even worshipped Black gods before they became Aryan.
India was the first country to oppose apartheid in South Africa. In doing so it invited ire of some powerful countries.
Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.If you knew the similarities between India and Africa it would blow you away. The Ganges river is named after the Ethiopian King Ganges. They even worshipped Black gods before they became Aryan.
India was the first country to oppose apartheid in South Africa. In doing so it invited ire of some powerful countries.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.India was the first country to oppose apartheid in South Africa. In doing so it invited ire of some powerful countries.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
I guess you never heard of the Dravidians or know very much about the history of ancient India? Long before whites were around there is evidence that the Dravidians, Egyptians and the Kush were part of a confederation called the Maa Confederation. Just like most of the world that area was originally inhabited by Blacks from Africa. That takes nothing away from India. The big difference is that they maintained their culture unlike Europeans who had to be re-educated in their own history by the Moors. I am in the process of finding out more about this shared history. There are a lot of linguistic ties to the Dravidian language and African languages. There are also a lot of African names for places in india and Pakistan like the Hindu Kush. I will let you know more as I find it. BTW I know Gandhi was a racist. However, that does not mean he speaks for the entire country of India. i am also well aware of the caste system and the untouchables.
That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
I guess you never heard of the Dravidians or know very much about the history of ancient India? Long before whites were around there is evidence that the Dravidians, Egyptians and the Kush were part of a confederation called the Maa Confederation. Just like most of the world that area was originally inhabited by Blacks from Africa. That takes nothing away from India. The big difference is that they maintained their culture unlike Europeans who had to be re-educated in their own history by the Moors. I am in the process of finding out more about this shared history. There are a lot of linguistic ties to the Dravidian language and African languages. There are also a lot of African names for places in india and Pakistan like the Hindu Kush. I will let you know more as I find it. BTW I know Gandhi was a racist. However, that does not mean he speaks for the entire country of India. i am also well aware of the caste system and the untouchables.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
I guess you never heard of the Dravidians or know very much about the history of ancient India? Long before whites were around there is evidence that the Dravidians, Egyptians and the Kush were part of a confederation called the Maa Confederation. Just like most of the world that area was originally inhabited by Blacks from Africa. That takes nothing away from India. The big difference is that they maintained their culture unlike Europeans who had to be re-educated in their own history by the Moors. I am in the process of finding out more about this shared history. There are a lot of linguistic ties to the Dravidian language and African languages. There are also a lot of African names for places in india and Pakistan like the Hindu Kush. I will let you know more as I find it. BTW I know Gandhi was a racist. However, that does not mean he speaks for the entire country of India. i am also well aware of the caste system and the untouchables.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
His fight Asc, not mine. If he wants to cede his culture and civilization's accomplishments to black Africans, that's his business.. Perhaps he agrees that Indian civilization was founded by black Africans, I don't know. I have always viewed India as one of the cradles of civilization, so I would disagree. Linguistically, there is no match, but anyway, as I said, it's his call.That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.I guess you never heard of the Dravidians or know very much about the history of ancient India? Long before whites were around there is evidence that the Dravidians, Egyptians and the Kush were part of a confederation called the Maa Confederation. Just like most of the world that area was originally inhabited by Blacks from Africa. That takes nothing away from India. The big difference is that they maintained their culture unlike Europeans who had to be re-educated in their own history by the Moors. I am in the process of finding out more about this shared history. There are a lot of linguistic ties to the Dravidian language and African languages. There are also a lot of African names for places in india and Pakistan like the Hindu Kush. I will let you know more as I find it. BTW I know Gandhi was a racist. However, that does not mean he speaks for the entire country of India. i am also well aware of the caste system and the untouchables.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
i was not in a fight with Vikrant. We were talking about the food. You pulled the ultimate desperate white boy move using the divide and conquer strategy. Wont work here clown.
I think most intelligent people would rather discover the truth about things instead of hanging on to a lie fed to them by whites. Thats why I am investigating it. There are a lot of things that point to East Indians actually starting as Africans from Africa. Why would they develop pretty much right in line with ancient Kush, Egyptian, and Sumerian civilizations?
Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.If you knew the similarities between India and Africa it would blow you away. The Ganges river is named after the Ethiopian King Ganges. They even worshipped Black gods before they became Aryan.
India was the first country to oppose apartheid in South Africa. In doing so it invited ire of some powerful countries.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
His fight Asc, not mine. If he wants to cede his culture and civilization's accomplishments to black Africans, that's his business.. Perhaps he agrees that Indian civilization was founded by black Africans, I don't know. I have always viewed India as one of the cradles of civilization, so I would disagree. Linguistically, there is no match, but anyway, as I said, it's his call.That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
i was not in a fight with Vikrant. We were talking about the food. You pulled the ultimate desperate white boy move using the divide and conquer strategy. Wont work here clown.
I think most intelligent people would rather discover the truth about things instead of hanging on to a lie fed to them by whites. Thats why I am investigating it. There are a lot of things that point to East Indians actually starting as Africans from Africa. Why would they develop pretty much right in line with ancient Kush, Egyptian, and Sumerian civilizations?
He seems wimpy enough though.
Your opinion is not relevant on linguistics. People that are paid to do this said there is a link. There is also that pesky DNA evidence.mtDNA variation[edit]
Most of the studies based on mtDNA variation have reported genetic unity of Indian populations across language, caste and tribal groups.[1][2][3] It is likely that haplogroup M was brought to Asia from East Africa along the southern route by earliest migration wave 60,000 years ago
That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.I guess you never heard of the Dravidians or know very much about the history of ancient India? Long before whites were around there is evidence that the Dravidians, Egyptians and the Kush were part of a confederation called the Maa Confederation. Just like most of the world that area was originally inhabited by Blacks from Africa. That takes nothing away from India. The big difference is that they maintained their culture unlike Europeans who had to be re-educated in their own history by the Moors. I am in the process of finding out more about this shared history. There are a lot of linguistic ties to the Dravidian language and African languages. There are also a lot of African names for places in india and Pakistan like the Hindu Kush. I will let you know more as I find it. BTW I know Gandhi was a racist. However, that does not mean he speaks for the entire country of India. i am also well aware of the caste system and the untouchables.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
I am appalled that you think Gandhi was racist. Gandhi devoted his entire life fighting against inequality. Interestingly enough his fight against inequality and bigotry too started in South Africa. Great leaders like Martin Luther King Jr were inspired by Gandhi's non violent struggle against oppression and injustice.
His fight Asc, not mine. If he wants to cede his culture and civilization's accomplishments to black Africans, that's his business.. Perhaps he agrees that Indian civilization was founded by black Africans, I don't know. I have always viewed India as one of the cradles of civilization, so I would disagree. Linguistically, there is no match, but anyway, as I said, it's his call.That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
i was not in a fight with Vikrant. We were talking about the food. You pulled the ultimate desperate white boy move using the divide and conquer strategy. Wont work here clown.
I think most intelligent people would rather discover the truth about things instead of hanging on to a lie fed to them by whites. Thats why I am investigating it. There are a lot of things that point to East Indians actually starting as Africans from Africa. Why would they develop pretty much right in line with ancient Kush, Egyptian, and Sumerian civilizations?
He seems wimpy enough though.
That's Vikrant's fight, not mine. If he wants to cede his heritage to one of the most primitive culture the world has known, that's his business. I would disagree and consider him a wimp, much as I do with you.
Indians may be less proud of their accomplishments, I don't know. Olmecs and ancient Egyptians are not present to defend their own, so I feel that their heritage needs to be defended from absurd appropriation. Vikrant is able to kiss your ass if he wants you to think he's cool, or he can defend the legacy of his ancestors. t's his call. That's life I suppose.
I am appalled that you think Gandhi was racist. Gandhi devoted his entire life fighting against inequality. Interestingly enough his fight against inequality and bigotry too started in South Africa. Great leaders like Martin Luther King Jr were inspired by Gandhi's non violent struggle against oppression and injustice.
Unfortunately, Gandhi did have some racists quotes MLK was unaware of. It doesn't take away from what he did for his people.
Yes, because it was the British who founded and fostered the caste culture.Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.India was the first country to oppose apartheid in South Africa. In doing so it invited ire of some powerful countries.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
Caste is more like a community one belongs to. There was discrimination against people of lower caste during British rule. But after 1947 when India became free, it has been illegal to discriminate against people based on caste, religion, color, etc.
I am appalled that you think Gandhi was racist. Gandhi devoted his entire life fighting against inequality. Interestingly enough his fight against inequality and bigotry too started in South Africa. Great leaders like Martin Luther King Jr were inspired by Gandhi's non violent struggle against oppression and injustice.
Unfortunately, Gandhi did have some racists quotes MLK was unaware of. It doesn't take away from what he did for his people.
Can you quote me one of his racist quotes? I would rather learn the truth than hold on to a fairy tale story.
~ G.D. Birla’s “In the Shadow of the Mahatma,” p. 276“This manslaughter must be stopped. You are losing; if you persist, it will only result in greater bloodshed. Hitler is not a bad man.”
Yes, because it was the British who founded and fostered the caste culture.Oh, grow a pair Vikrant. He's going to be telling you whatever achievements India has had was because of black Africans and you'll be bending over.
India's primary concern about apartheid was the effect it had on Indians in that country. They didn't give a rat's ass about black Africans. The truth is India has a well-entrenched system of discrimination as well called the caste system. Other than race, there was not much difference in relegation of second-class citizenship, except of course that apartheid is gone but you caste system still lingers.
Kiss ass if you wish. I suppose we all get off on different things.
Caste is more like a community one belongs to. There was discrimination against people of lower caste during British rule. But after 1947 when India became free, it has been illegal to discriminate against people based on caste, religion, color, etc.
We had spoken on certain geopolitical matters in which I had found you fairly lucid. Now you come off like a self-righteous hack trying to cast the caste system as a Western construct and ceding the origins of your own culture. In other words, the British are to blame for the caste system and your achievements are the works of black Africans.
FFS Vikrant, grow a fucking pair!
