Toronado3800
Gold Member
- Nov 15, 2009
- 7,608
- 560
- 140
My glasses are clear.
I consider it true that Bill Clinton's signing of NAFTA cost Hillary Clinton .25% of the vote she needed in the last election and in a way they got what they deserved out of it.
The neo-revisionism of history by Republican cheerleaders is difficult to swallow though.
NAFTA had been kicking around for a good decade under two Republican Presidents and all Bill Clinton did was prove he was a globalist like H Bush or Reagan.
History lesson: More Republicans than Democrats supported NAFTA
What Is the History and Purpose of NAFTA?
North American Free Trade Agreement - Wikipedia
It is totally fine to be against NAFTA.
It is totally fine to be against Bill Clinton's signing of NAFTA. (I am lol, follow me!)
You can wave the Trump flag and hope he does something about it.
It is hypocritical to wave the Republican flag and do either of those though.
Its time to educate voters who are not old enough to remember 1990
I consider it true that Bill Clinton's signing of NAFTA cost Hillary Clinton .25% of the vote she needed in the last election and in a way they got what they deserved out of it.
The neo-revisionism of history by Republican cheerleaders is difficult to swallow though.
NAFTA had been kicking around for a good decade under two Republican Presidents and all Bill Clinton did was prove he was a globalist like H Bush or Reagan.
History lesson: More Republicans than Democrats supported NAFTA
What Is the History and Purpose of NAFTA?
North American Free Trade Agreement - Wikipedia
It is totally fine to be against NAFTA.
It is totally fine to be against Bill Clinton's signing of NAFTA. (I am lol, follow me!)
You can wave the Trump flag and hope he does something about it.
It is hypocritical to wave the Republican flag and do either of those though.
Its time to educate voters who are not old enough to remember 1990