To what degree is it appropriate for a sitting president to deprecate a SCOTUS decision?

[Leo123]

She was laughing at you poor benighted cultists who needed help with that.

She is the one who needs help. She doesn't even know how to define her own born sex. If you ask me, her and people like you are the 'benighted cultists.'

 

[Leo123]

Their stance on Roe at their confirmation is well documented
Nothing to prove

Translation: "I can't prove shit" so I lie.

 

[surada]

Jackson stayed that John Marshall made his ruling, now he could enforce it.

BRIA 26 1 Plato and Aristotle on Tyranny and the Rule of Law - Online Lessons - Bill of Rights in Action - Teach Democracy

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION Bill of Rights in Action FALL 2010 (Volume 26, No. 1) Tyranny The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom | Plato and Aristotle on Tyranny and the Rule of Law | Nigeria Plato and Aristotle on Tyranny and the Rule of Law Nearly 2,400 years ago,, Nearly...

www.crf-usa.org

 

[Rogue AI]

They lied

They specifically stated Roe v Wade was the law of the land and that they supported the precedence

If they thought Roe was UnConstitutional, they should have stated so when they were confirmed

Instead……They lied

Ha ha.

 

[rightwinger]

They’re conservatives. They stick with the Constitution. If your characterization of Republicans are those who follow Constitutional law, fine with me.

The TRUMPCourt is grossly partisan and uses the Constitution only when convenient

 

[Indeependent]

They lied

They specifically stated Roe v Wade was the law of the land and that they supported the precedence

If they thought Roe was UnConstitutional, they should have stated so when they were confirmed

Instead……They lied

yawn...

 

[Indeependent]

The TRUMPCourt is grossly partisan and uses the Constitution only when convenient

How many inches is your Club's Presidents Private Part that you have to make up lies all day long.

 

[MarathonMike]

Biden was pretty harsh this afternoon as his condemned the conservative justices and called it a “sad day for the country*” and the ruling a “tragic error.” He even went so far as to claim that the justices “took away a Constitutional right” when of course there is no constitutional right to an abortion and was the crux of what the SCOTUS determined.

Is it not undermining a co-equal branch of the government for a president to say that the SCOTUS has violated the Constitution?

* It‘s not a sad day for million of yet unborn children.

Biden blasts Supreme Court's abortion decision: 'This is not over'

President Joe Biden said the Supreme Court is leading the country on a dangerous path.

www.freep.com

Everything the Bozo in Chief says or does is wrong.

 

[22lcidw]

Maybe because they lied about their intent

The Supreme Court is not above reproach.
They are judged by all Americans and will be judged by History

Progs use judges for their agendas. The Supreme Court is the last way of total control. And the judges still give them some stuff.

 

[jknowgood]

Biden was pretty harsh this afternoon as his condemned the conservative justices and called it a “sad day for the country*” and the ruling a “tragic error.” He even went so far as to claim that the justices “took away a Constitutional right” when of course there is no constitutional right to an abortion and was the crux of what the SCOTUS determined.

Is it not undermining a co-equal branch of the government for a president to say that the SCOTUS has violated the Constitution?

* It‘s not a sad day for million of yet unborn children.

Biden blasts Supreme Court's abortion decision: 'This is not over'

President Joe Biden said the Supreme Court is leading the country on a dangerous path.

www.freep.com

 

[Leo123]

The TRUMPCourt is grossly partisan and uses the Constitution only when convenient

Thank God we do not have the Obama partisan court!!!

 

[22lcidw]

The TRUMPCourt is grossly partisan and uses the Constitution only when convenient

The same court made a decision on abortion in 1973.

 

[Leo123]

The same court made a decision on abortion in 1973.

Yeah but RW agrees with THAT decision.

 

[Leo123]

Hopefully, going into the future, killing babies won't become the Federal institution that it was.

 

[healthmyths]

Jackson stayed that John Marshall made his ruling, now he could enforce it.

Just your opinion! Where is your proof? Plus... how lazy? "stayed"???? What does that mean?

 

[healthmyths]

BRIA 26 1 Plato and Aristotle on Tyranny and the Rule of Law - Online Lessons - Bill of Rights in Action - Teach Democracy

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION Bill of Rights in Action FALL 2010 (Volume 26, No. 1) Tyranny The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom | Plato and Aristotle on Tyranny and the Rule of Law | Nigeria Plato and Aristotle on Tyranny and the Rule of Law Nearly 2,400 years ago,, Nearly...

www.crf-usa.org

First of all THANKS! For the link! Very good to learn where you got your opinion.

NOW is this what you based your Jackson's "stayed that John Marshall made his ruling, now he could enforce it"
Now this is what your Marshall reference..
The Indian Removal Act offered tribes in the East lands in an area west of the Mississippi (soon to be called “Indian Territory”). The U.S. government promised to compensate the tribes for the property they would have to abandon.
In 1832, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that Jackson was wrong.
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the majority opinion that the Constitution gave to Congress, not the states.
Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.
But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.

 

[BackAgain]

PROVE IT. Where in history did Jackson tell the court to stuff it? GIVE me proof and not your subjective totally biased and ignorant opinion!

“ In the 1832 case of Worcester v Georgia, President Andrew Jackson, who disagreed with the SCOTUS opinion in the matter, famously said ‘John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.’”

https://askinglot.com/how-did-andrew-jackson-go-against-the-supreme-court

 

[BackAgain]

Their stance on Roe at their confirmation is well documented
Nothing to prove

Their stance was correct. It was “settled” law, as little as that phrase means. No lie at all. Before Brown v. Board of Education, Plessy v. Ferguson was also “settled” law (for a longer period of time than between Roe v. Wade and Dobbs). Should the SCOTUS not have overruled “separate by equal?”

You have something to prove, Leftwhiner. But you can’t rise to the occasion because you’re full of shit.

 

[busybee01]

Biden was pretty harsh this afternoon as his condemned the conservative justices and called it a “sad day for the country*” and the ruling a “tragic error.” He even went so far as to claim that the justices “took away a Constitutional right” when of course there is no constitutional right to an abortion and was the crux of what the SCOTUS determined.

Is it not undermining a co-equal branch of the government for a president to say that the SCOTUS has violated the Constitution?

* It‘s not a sad day for million of yet unborn children.

Biden blasts Supreme Court's abortion decision: 'This is not over'

President Joe Biden said the Supreme Court is leading the country on a dangerous path.

www.freep.com

Biden was np0otr harsh enough. What we have is 6 righty wing Nazis who are aiding Republicans into turning this into a dictatorship. The Supreme Court is the enemy of the people.

The fact is that the SCOTUS has ignored the Constitution.

There is no such thing as a unborn child. A fetus is not a child.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Biden was np0otr harsh enough. What we have is 6 righty wing Nazis who are aiding Republicans into turning this into a dictatorship. The Supreme Court is the enemy of the people.

The fact is that the SCOTUS has ignored the Constitution.

There is no such thing as a unborn child. A fetus is not a child.

Oooh boy, you're really mad huh