Took 232 years to aquire a 10 trillion dollar debt. Since then another 7 Trillion

MeNonPartisan

Rookie
Jul 27, 2013
32
4
Since then another 7 Trillion was added while Obama was President, and he's only 57% done. Considering the trend plus HCR, debt will have increased 240% during Obama's tenure.

232 years to acquire 10 Trillion
8 years to aquire 14 Trillion more.......................MINIMUM
 
Last edited:
Since then another 7 Trillion was added while Obama was President, and he's only 57% done. Considering the trend plus HCR, debt will have increased 240% during Obama's tenure.

232 years to acquire 10 Trillion
8 years to aquire 14 Trillion more.......................MINIMUM

Be careful-- The it was Bush's fault crowd are filling the cheap seats

In other words, they believe no matter who would of been put in the White House in 08, that we would be in this same position today if not worse

Obama applied for a job he was not qualified for

-Geaux
 
No one on the other side gives a damn.

No one cares about bettering this country anymore.
 
Obama really said this? If so, WOW......................He's more a threat than I thought.

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
Barack Obama July 2, 2008"
 
Obama really said this? If so, WOW......................He's more a threat than I thought.

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
Barack Obama July 2, 2008"

Of course he did..

Surprised?

-Geaux
 
The fact that both sides can't talk and work together is sad. We both should want to work towards the betterment of this nation.

It seems that we have both gone to extremes. Out of our fucking minds.
 
Of course he did..

Surprised?



Guess I shouldn't be. I know he's an ultra-socialist at heart. For instance, when he said "you didn't build this", he was speaking from the heart. Apparantly he's a traitor too.
 
What's even more sad is we didn't learn the lessons of the 20th century. Marxism Failed ending up killing over a hundred million people. When do we stop trying it? The left somehow believes that it can make it work??? Insanity!

Also we should of learned our lesson with PURE capitalism after what happened in the early 20th century.

Appears we haven't learned.
 
Last edited:
In fairness, some of the debt is on Bush. However, watch what happens 8 years from now.. Can you say 32 Trillion?
 
Of course he did..

Surprised?



Guess I shouldn't be. I know he's an ultra-socialist at heart. For instance, when he said "you didn't build this", he was speaking from the heart. Apparantly he's a traitor too.

[youtube]Tt2yGzHfy7s[/youtube]

-Geaux
 
It's a balance between pure caplitism and Marxism. Going to either extreme is very bad.

Obama wants to take us towards Marxism.
 
Last edited:
Obama wants to give everyone free shit for power
Obama wants to put people on welfare, food stamps, etc
Obama wants to grow the public sector

You see Obama wants to control. This is what these kinds of people do....Now the public sector isn't all bad as it has it's place within society but only a small percentage of society is needed within it.

This is why I say it is a balance. The private sector must be free to grow within a hybrid society in which we have.
 
Actually, hater dupe, it took 200 years to get to 1 trillion. Reagan tripled it, W doubled thatt, and it's cost Obama 6 trillion to avert W's DEPRESSION. Neocons are a catastrophe....only their propaganda machine could confuse you people so bad....
 
Obama wants to give everyone free shit for power
Obama wants to put people on welfare, food stamps, etc
Obama wants to grow the public sector

You see Obama wants to control. This is what these kinds of people do....Now the public sector isn't all bad as it has it's place within society but only a small percentage of society is needed within it.

This is why I say it is a balance. The private sector must be free to grow within a hybrid society in which we have.


Helping the victims of W's depression, through the eyes of Pub hater dupes...a disgrace...lol. See sig
 
Since then another 7 Trillion was added while Obama was President, and he's only 57% done. Considering the trend plus HCR, debt will have increased 240% during Obama's tenure.

232 years to acquire 10 Trillion
8 years to aquire 14 Trillion more.......................MINIMUM

75% of that $10 trillion was acquired during Republican administrations, primarily Reagan and Bush 43.
 
Since then another 7 Trillion was added while Obama was President, and he's only 57% done. Considering the trend plus HCR, debt will have increased 240% during Obama's tenure.

232 years to acquire 10 Trillion
8 years to aquire 14 Trillion more.......................MINIMUM

75% of that $10 trillion was acquired during Republican administrations, primarily Reagan and Bush 43.

54236326_us_debt_464_corr.gif


Yes Reagan and Bush caused a lot of Debt. So has Obama!

Reagan, Bush, Bush caused by 7 trillion
 
Last edited:
Honestly where the fuck is this money going?

It isn't going to science. Fuck, Obama is cutting the shit out of that.
It isn't going into our military...They're furlonging people.
It isn't going into infrastructure as money for that is at the lowest point since 2007.

It isn't going to help the poor

WTF?
 
Actually, hater dupe, it took 200 years to get to 1 trillion. Reagan tripled it, W doubled thatt, and it's cost Obama 6 trillion to avert W's DEPRESSION. Neocons are a catastrophe....only their propaganda machine could confuse you people so bad....

And he has averted what, and just how?

-Geaux
 

Forum List

Back
Top