Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Five days later, and you have no natural curiosity as to what our intel is telling us about Iran, N. Korea, ISIS, and the wall? This is exactly why a third of the country are Trump apologizing Sheep. They haven't a clue about what is going on. They have no understanding of the truth or reality. But when Trump pops up and calls everything fake news, his Sheep are Johnny on the spot to listen. You, like a third of the country only have selective interests. The convenient type.You didn't watch and listen to their testimony? If you didn't, don't ask me. You're too lazy to do your own research because you have zero interest in the truth, and have no natural curiosity.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
So, what was it about?
Your op complained a lot about something, but never actually mentioned what the "issue" is.
Almost like you don't care about the "issue" you are upset about and just want to throw shit at the President.
The Left from the beginning, never voted for the wall. Trump's Sheep did. And they also were told Mexico would pay for it. The Left didn't vote for us to pay for it either. You want it, you pay for it.I am getting to the point where I do not beleive the nutters can still beleive this horseshit. At some point you have to start thinking these are paid bots. They go on and on about the dems not funding the wall and how they are traitors when the republicans had super majority and did not fund it. Then they blame shit on Ryan and any one but Trump as he spouts ludicris shit all day. It gets harder and harder to believe what these supporters are saying. Not only do our intellegence report dispute what Don the liar is saying but our allies are currently figuing out how to get around our sanctions in Iran and supporting what our inttelegence sais. Meanwhile Trump supporters are deaf as the entire world tells them thier leader is full of shit.The nutter responses to this post are gonna be fun to read.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
If that were true, you would have provided the link. Clinton was talking about chemical weapons and Bush was talking about nuclear. My fact check link proved that.Bill Clinton said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez two years after the invasion, ignoramus.It doesn`t matter what anyone said BEFORE the UN weapons inspection team failed to find WMDs. Good grief it`s like I`m trying to explain something to a 3 year old. Who ties your shoes in the morning and gets you on the bus for special ed?You obviously never bothered to listen to Hillary’s push for war speech.They didn`t push for war but they voted to authorize a war as a means to force Saddam into letting the UN weapons inspectors into the country and it worked. The vote to authorize was taken BEFORE the inspectors failed to find those WMDs and Colin Powell`s mobile weapons labs. The responsibility for 20,000+ casualties belongs to one man and only one man. President Cheney.Shame how Hillary pushed for war and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez.A bigger idiot for ignoring Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors who failed to find anything that could threaten Iraq`s neighbors let alone us.
Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was President. Why do you think Bill is lying for Bush?
The Left from the beginning, never voted for the wall. Trump's Sheep did. And they also were told Mexico would pay for it. The Left didn't vote for us to pay for it either. You want it, you pay for it.[/QUO I am not for the wall.Thought I made that pretty clear. I am not sure there is any one actually for the wall. I think even those who state they are for it now realize it is just another excuse for our government to do nothing and blame the other side.I am getting to the point where I do not beleive the nutters can still beleive this horseshit. At some point you have to start thinking these are paid bots. They go on and on about the dems not funding the wall and how they are traitors when the republicans had super majority and did not fund it. Then they blame shit on Ryan and any one but Trump as he spouts ludicris shit all day. It gets harder and harder to believe what these supporters are saying. Not only do our intellegence report dispute what Don the liar is saying but our allies are currently figuing out how to get around our sanctions in Iran and supporting what our inttelegence sais. Meanwhile Trump supporters are deaf as the entire world tells them thier leader is full of shit.The nutter responses to this post are gonna be fun to read.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
It doesn`t matter what anyone said BEFORE the UN weapons inspection team failed to find WMDs. Good grief it`s like I`m trying to explain something to a 3 year old. Who ties your shoes in the morning and gets you on the bus for special ed?You obviously never bothered to listen to Hillary’s push for war speech.They didn`t push for war but they voted to authorize a war as a means to force Saddam into letting the UN weapons inspectors into the country and it worked. The vote to authorize was taken BEFORE the inspectors failed to find those WMDs and Colin Powell`s mobile weapons labs. The responsibility for 20,000+ casualties belongs to one man and only one man. President Cheney.Shame how Hillary pushed for war and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez.A bigger idiot for ignoring Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors who failed to find anything that could threaten Iraq`s neighbors let alone us.Funny how Bush was an IDIOT for listening to George Tenet.
Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was President. Why do you think Bill is lying for Bush?
Five days later, and you have no natural curiosity as to what our intel is telling us about Iran, N. Korea, ISIS, and the wall? This is exactly why a third of the country are Trump apologizing Sheep. They haven't a clue about what is going on. They have no understanding of the truth or reality. But when Trump pops up and calls everything fake news, his Sheep are Johnny on the spot to listen. You, like a third of the country only have selective interests. The convenient type.You didn't watch and listen to their testimony? If you didn't, don't ask me. You're too lazy to do your own research because you have zero interest in the truth, and have no natural curiosity.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
So, what was it about?
Your op complained a lot about something, but never actually mentioned what the "issue" is.
Almost like you don't care about the "issue" you are upset about and just want to throw shit at the President.
They had aging yellow cake which we already were aware of. If Saddam had WMDs why wouldn`t he have used them against the criminal invasion? Because he was a nice guy? Are you trying to imply that he was a threat to the U.S.? We were pissed because of the 9-11 terrorist attack so we chose a country that had very little to defend itself. A country with no ties to 9-11 btw.It doesn`t matter what anyone said BEFORE the UN weapons inspection team failed to find WMDs. Good grief it`s like I`m trying to explain something to a 3 year old. Who ties your shoes in the morning and gets you on the bus for special ed?You obviously never bothered to listen to Hillary’s push for war speech.They didn`t push for war but they voted to authorize a war as a means to force Saddam into letting the UN weapons inspectors into the country and it worked. The vote to authorize was taken BEFORE the inspectors failed to find those WMDs and Colin Powell`s mobile weapons labs. The responsibility for 20,000+ casualties belongs to one man and only one man. President Cheney.Shame how Hillary pushed for war and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez.A bigger idiot for ignoring Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors who failed to find anything that could threaten Iraq`s neighbors let alone us.
Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was President. Why do you think Bill is lying for Bush?
Are you trying to imply that the weapons teams reported that there were no WMDs?
He was convicted of gassing people in the years 1982 and 1988. 2003 was a little late to be liberating Iraq. You think? Do you ever think?A bigger idiot for ignoring Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors who failed to find anything that could threaten Iraq`s neighbors let alone us.Funny how Bush was an IDIOT for listening to George Tenet.
Saddam Hussein gassing his own people with chemical weapons wasn't a threat to his neighboring countries?
The weapons team never found any "nuclear weapons" which is what Bush was trying to pedal. In the meantime, Cheney was pushing a connection between Zarqawi and Saddam, and our CIA insisted there was no connection, but Cheney invented a connection. A few leftover chemical weapons that we sold to Saddam were found.It doesn`t matter what anyone said BEFORE the UN weapons inspection team failed to find WMDs. Good grief it`s like I`m trying to explain something to a 3 year old. Who ties your shoes in the morning and gets you on the bus for special ed?You obviously never bothered to listen to Hillary’s push for war speech.They didn`t push for war but they voted to authorize a war as a means to force Saddam into letting the UN weapons inspectors into the country and it worked. The vote to authorize was taken BEFORE the inspectors failed to find those WMDs and Colin Powell`s mobile weapons labs. The responsibility for 20,000+ casualties belongs to one man and only one man. President Cheney.Shame how Hillary pushed for war and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez.A bigger idiot for ignoring Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors who failed to find anything that could threaten Iraq`s neighbors let alone us.
Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was President. Why do you think Bill is lying for Bush?
Are you trying to imply that the weapons teams reported that there were no WMDs?
Five days later, and you have no natural curiosity as to what our intel is telling us about Iran, N. Korea, ISIS, and the wall? This is exactly why a third of the country are Trump apologizing Sheep. They haven't a clue about what is going on. They have no understanding of the truth or reality. But when Trump pops up and calls everything fake news, his Sheep are Johnny on the spot to listen. You, like a third of the country only have selective interests. The convenient type.You didn't watch and listen to their testimony? If you didn't, don't ask me. You're too lazy to do your own research because you have zero interest in the truth, and have no natural curiosity.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
So, what was it about?
Your op complained a lot about something, but never actually mentioned what the "issue" is.
Almost like you don't care about the "issue" you are upset about and just want to throw shit at the President.
At this point, they don't have any credibility, especially on the Wall, beyond any hard evidence they can present and the logic of their arguments, such as it is.
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what specifically they said that you are so concerned about, that Trump is not doing the right thing on.
Your op contained no hint of what issue you were whining about, in your whine.
Don't be worried. Trump will be giving up the Presidency in about six more years.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
You're not very smart are you.The Left from the beginning, never voted for the wall. Trump's Sheep did. And they also were told Mexico would pay for it. The Left didn't vote for us to pay for it either. You want it, you pay for it.I am getting to the point where I do not beleive the nutters can still beleive this horseshit. At some point you have to start thinking these are paid bots. They go on and on about the dems not funding the wall and how they are traitors when the republicans had super majority and did not fund it. Then they blame shit on Ryan and any one but Trump as he spouts ludicris shit all day. It gets harder and harder to believe what these supporters are saying. Not only do our intellegence report dispute what Don the liar is saying but our allies are currently figuing out how to get around our sanctions in Iran and supporting what our inttelegence sais. Meanwhile Trump supporters are deaf as the entire world tells them thier leader is full of shit.The nutter responses to this post are gonna be fun to read.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
They have presented evidence. Illegal immigration has been at historic lows since Obama and Trump. They reported evidence to the committee that Iran was complying with the Iran deal. They also presented evidence about N. Korea's plans to keep their nuclear program in tact.Five days later, and you have no natural curiosity as to what our intel is telling us about Iran, N. Korea, ISIS, and the wall? This is exactly why a third of the country are Trump apologizing Sheep. They haven't a clue about what is going on. They have no understanding of the truth or reality. But when Trump pops up and calls everything fake news, his Sheep are Johnny on the spot to listen. You, like a third of the country only have selective interests. The convenient type.You didn't watch and listen to their testimony? If you didn't, don't ask me. You're too lazy to do your own research because you have zero interest in the truth, and have no natural curiosity.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
So, what was it about?
Your op complained a lot about something, but never actually mentioned what the "issue" is.
Almost like you don't care about the "issue" you are upset about and just want to throw shit at the President.
At this point, they don't have any credibility, especially on the Wall, beyond any hard evidence they can present and the logic of their arguments, such as it is.
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what specifically they said that you are so concerned about, that Trump is not doing the right thing on.
Your op contained no hint of what issue you were whining about, in your whine.
Negative! No one ever said anything about a 2000 mile concrete wall. We've already debunked your claim.You're not very smart are you.The Left from the beginning, never voted for the wall. Trump's Sheep did. And they also were told Mexico would pay for it. The Left didn't vote for us to pay for it either. You want it, you pay for it.I am getting to the point where I do not beleive the nutters can still beleive this horseshit. At some point you have to start thinking these are paid bots. They go on and on about the dems not funding the wall and how they are traitors when the republicans had super majority and did not fund it. Then they blame shit on Ryan and any one but Trump as he spouts ludicris shit all day. It gets harder and harder to believe what these supporters are saying. Not only do our intellegence report dispute what Don the liar is saying but our allies are currently figuing out how to get around our sanctions in Iran and supporting what our inttelegence sais. Meanwhile Trump supporters are deaf as the entire world tells them thier leader is full of shit.The nutter responses to this post are gonna be fun to read.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
Democrats supported the wall in 2006 when it was a fence
Proofs in the pudding. If it had support it would have been funded yet it was not funded and there fore did not have support. NextYou're not very smart are you.The Left from the beginning, never voted for the wall. Trump's Sheep did. And they also were told Mexico would pay for it. The Left didn't vote for us to pay for it either. You want it, you pay for it.I am getting to the point where I do not beleive the nutters can still beleive this horseshit. At some point you have to start thinking these are paid bots. They go on and on about the dems not funding the wall and how they are traitors when the republicans had super majority and did not fund it. Then they blame shit on Ryan and any one but Trump as he spouts ludicris shit all day. It gets harder and harder to believe what these supporters are saying. Not only do our intellegence report dispute what Don the liar is saying but our allies are currently figuing out how to get around our sanctions in Iran and supporting what our inttelegence sais. Meanwhile Trump supporters are deaf as the entire world tells them thier leader is full of shit.The nutter responses to this post are gonna be fun to read.Trump calls intel chiefs public testimony ‘fake news’
After disputing all testimony from the top Intel chiefs in this country this week, Trump took the liberty to tell the world today that it was all "fake news".
What we have here is an authoritarian wanna be who takes his marching orders from Putin. After lying to the press today, he said the Intel admitted to misquoting themselves about their testimony, then interrupted further questions by dismissing the press. We'll, first off, no, they did not admit any misquotes. That's a lie. They said what they said, which was contrary to everything Trump has said in the past about foreign policy. And second, the biggest national security threat to this country is Trump, his Republican goons who try and cover for him, and his base. Going against our intelligence staff is our biggest threat to date, and he must be totally stopped from doing further damage.
Democrats supported the wall in 2006 when it was a fence
They had aging yellow cake which we already were aware of. If Saddam had WMDs why wouldn`t he have used them against the criminal invasion? Because he was a nice guy? Are you trying to imply that he was a threat to the U.S.? We were pissed because of the 9-11 terrorist attack so we chose a country that had very little to defend itself. A country with no ties to 9-11 btw.It doesn`t matter what anyone said BEFORE the UN weapons inspection team failed to find WMDs. Good grief it`s like I`m trying to explain something to a 3 year old. Who ties your shoes in the morning and gets you on the bus for special ed?You obviously never bothered to listen to Hillary’s push for war speech.They didn`t push for war but they voted to authorize a war as a means to force Saddam into letting the UN weapons inspectors into the country and it worked. The vote to authorize was taken BEFORE the inspectors failed to find those WMDs and Colin Powell`s mobile weapons labs. The responsibility for 20,000+ casualties belongs to one man and only one man. President Cheney.Shame how Hillary pushed for war and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez.
Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was President. Why do you think Bill is lying for Bush?
Are you trying to imply that the weapons teams reported that there were no WMDs?
The weapons team never found any "nuclear weapons" which is what Bush was trying to pedal. In the meantime, Cheney was pushing a connection between Zarqawi and Saddam, and our CIA insisted there was no connection, but Cheney invented a connection. A few leftover chemical weapons that we sold to Saddam were found.It doesn`t matter what anyone said BEFORE the UN weapons inspection team failed to find WMDs. Good grief it`s like I`m trying to explain something to a 3 year old. Who ties your shoes in the morning and gets you on the bus for special ed?You obviously never bothered to listen to Hillary’s push for war speech.They didn`t push for war but they voted to authorize a war as a means to force Saddam into letting the UN weapons inspectors into the country and it worked. The vote to authorize was taken BEFORE the inspectors failed to find those WMDs and Colin Powell`s mobile weapons labs. The responsibility for 20,000+ casualties belongs to one man and only one man. President Cheney.Shame how Hillary pushed for war and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was Prez.
Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was President. Why do you think Bill is lying for Bush?
Are you trying to imply that the weapons teams reported that there were no WMDs?
Five days later, and you have no natural curiosity as to what our intel is telling us about Iran, N. Korea, ISIS, and the wall? This is exactly why a third of the country are Trump apologizing Sheep. They haven't a clue about what is going on. They have no understanding of the truth or reality. But when Trump pops up and calls everything fake news, his Sheep are Johnny on the spot to listen. You, like a third of the country only have selective interests. The convenient type.You didn't watch and listen to their testimony? If you didn't, don't ask me. You're too lazy to do your own research because you have zero interest in the truth, and have no natural curiosity.So, what was it about?
Your op complained a lot about something, but never actually mentioned what the "issue" is.
Almost like you don't care about the "issue" you are upset about and just want to throw shit at the President.
At this point, they don't have any credibility, especially on the Wall, beyond any hard evidence they can present and the logic of their arguments, such as it is.
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what specifically they said that you are so concerned about, that Trump is not doing the right thing on.
Your op contained no hint of what issue you were whining about, in your whine.
FFS, this is pathetic. His point was quite clear to everybody else that commented on this thread.
