Trump Employs 34,000 People

According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
Does that qualify him to be POTUS?
Well, we've tried career politicians for many, many decades, they all of been a failure
Dont lump every politician into the same basket. There are many good ones. In the case of Trump he has no idea what he is doing, which is so evident in the debate. Are you still expecting him to build you a wall?
Are you still expecting him to deport 11million + people?
I'm writing in a candidate, Elmer Fudd
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
Does that qualify him to be POTUS?
Better question...

Does one who does not see that as "paying taxes" qualify to be president?

After all, the payroll taxes Trump pays IN ONE YEAR for 34,000 employees likely outmatches the entire amount of taxes Hillary and Bill have paid in their lifetime.

And those taxes are used for our military and cops, etc....you know.....contrary to what Hillary claims.
 
Amazing how many of the public has fallen for this "job creator" class ruse.

Um ... so business owners don't create jobs? It's a con? Government creates jobs, right Pablo?
Business owners do NOT create jobs, its people who buy products and services who create jobs. Demand is the greatest job creator

Yes, comrade. One question.

How do customers buy my products and services if I don't hire people to produce those products and services?

You actually do some work yourself, and hire as demand grows.

No, I don't hire employees, my customers do. That was the argument.

So why do I have to fill out all those freaking government payroll forms then? Why don't my customers do it?
 
Amazing how many of the public has fallen for this "job creator" class ruse.

Um ... so business owners don't create jobs? It's a con? Government creates jobs, right Pablo?
Business owners do NOT create jobs, its people who buy products and services who create jobs. Demand is the greatest job creator
Actually...you are wrong.

Ideas and risk takers create jobs.

Demand maintains those jobs.

Basic business 101.
 
Amazing how many of the public has fallen for this "job creator" class ruse.

Um ... so business owners don't create jobs? It's a con? Government creates jobs, right Pablo?
Business owners do NOT create jobs, its people who buy products and services who create jobs. Demand is the greatest job creator

Yes, comrade. One question.

How do customers buy my products and services if I don't hire people to produce those products and services?

You actually do some work yourself, and hire as demand grows.
Yes, a restaurant owner doesn't create jobs unless people walk through his door in large enough numbers

Begging the question.

Also, I don't have food to sell them unless my vendors provide it to me. BTW, I used to actually own a restaurant, one of several businesses that I've owned. So didn't my vendors actually hire my employees?
 
It amazes me how many people try to debate about "job creation" who have absolutely no idea about job creation.....and those that debate taxes yet have absolutely no idea what kind of taxes an employer is faced with.
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
Does that qualify him to be POTUS?
Well, we've tried career politicians for many, many decades, they all of been a failure

It's the system stupid. Where do you think your "career politicians" come from. That's right, the american public, from the system, and the public has rewarded this behavior pattern and offered its unwavering consent.
Single term limits would fix what ails, The problem IS the federal government all of corrupt behavior is due to the career politician. Dip shit
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
So....hitlery un-employed more than 34,000 people....:lol:


The Left are so amusing. They decry Top Down Trickle Down economics (and job creators)...while promoting Big Government's Takeover of Everything.

Nothing is more top down than an authoritarian centralized government.

Just sayin'.

We all know who rolled trickle down onto society love.

No, apparently you don't. It was first used to describe GOVERNMENT SPENDING and UNFUNDED MANDATES.


The phrase appears within the AP reporter’s paraphrase of the L.A. Olympic committee’s argument (perhaps made by Ueberroth, perhaps made by someone else, but certainly consistent with what Ueberroth is quoted saying in the story) that $88 million in previously-unacknowledged federal subsidies for the games would be money well spent. The committee, AP reported, “has countered [arguments that U.S. taxpayers were getting ripped off] that the Games will generate millions in direct taxes and indirect, trickle-down government revenues.” In this context, then, “trickle-down government” is shorthand for government spending that has a stimulative multiplier effect on private-sector economic growth. Romney’s 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics, incidentally, ended up costing the federal government $342 million, which (after inflation) was two and a quarter times as much trickle-down government Keynesian stimulus as the $88 million described in the 1984 story.

Something very like the phrase “trickle-down government” is also used in a 1990 Newsday story. Here it's pejorative, but its meaning is to criticize the bait-and-switch devolution of government functions to state and local governments, which of course Romney very much favors:

New York and other older cities are suffering the most from the “trickle down” of government responsibility from the federal to the local level, notes Rae Rosen, an economist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. On top of everything else, city residents must now put up with tax increases and cutbacks in services and the “privatization of services” they used to take for granted, such as public schools, neighborhood security and even mail delivery. In other words, after paying more for less government, New Yorkers must shell out even more to live here.

Sen. Chuck Robb, D.-Va., uses the phrase “trickle-down government” to describe similar buck-passing in a 1991 speech to the National Association of Counties, though here there is also a hint that the ultimate fault might lie with the federal government for imposing burdensome mandates:

When your states are loaded up with new responsibilities and no way to pay for them, they usually play bucket brigade themselves and dump hand-me-down mandates on the counties and municipalities.



A Brief History Of “Trickle-Down Government”
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
Does that qualify him to be POTUS?
Well, we've tried career politicians for many, many decades, they all of been a failure

It's the system stupid. Where do you think your "career politicians" come from. That's right, the american public, from the system, and the public has rewarded this behavior pattern and offered its unwavering consent.
Single term limits would fix what ails, The problem IS the federal government all of corrupt behavior is due to the career politician. Dip shit

Pffffffffffffft, yeah sure, that'' alter everything won't it. Simpleton.
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
So....hitlery un-employed more than 34,000 people....:lol:


The Left are so amusing. They decry Top Down Trickle Down economics (and job creators)...while promoting Big Government's Takeover of Everything.

Nothing is more top down than an authoritarian centralized government.

Just sayin'.

We all know who rolled trickle down onto society love.

No, apparently you don't. It was first used to describe GOVERNMENT SPENDING and UNFUNDED MANDATES.


The phrase appears within the AP reporter’s paraphrase of the L.A. Olympic committee’s argument (perhaps made by Ueberroth, perhaps made by someone else, but certainly consistent with what Ueberroth is quoted saying in the story) that $88 million in previously-unacknowledged federal subsidies for the games would be money well spent. The committee, AP reported, “has countered [arguments that U.S. taxpayers were getting ripped off] that the Games will generate millions in direct taxes and indirect, trickle-down government revenues.” In this context, then, “trickle-down government” is shorthand for government spending that has a stimulative multiplier effect on private-sector economic growth. Romney’s 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics, incidentally, ended up costing the federal government $342 million, which (after inflation) was two and a quarter times as much trickle-down government Keynesian stimulus as the $88 million described in the 1984 story.

Something very like the phrase “trickle-down government” is also used in a 1990 Newsday story. Here it's pejorative, but its meaning is to criticize the bait-and-switch devolution of government functions to state and local governments, which of course Romney very much favors:

New York and other older cities are suffering the most from the “trickle down” of government responsibility from the federal to the local level, notes Rae Rosen, an economist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. On top of everything else, city residents must now put up with tax increases and cutbacks in services and the “privatization of services” they used to take for granted, such as public schools, neighborhood security and even mail delivery. In other words, after paying more for less government, New Yorkers must shell out even more to live here.

Sen. Chuck Robb, D.-Va., uses the phrase “trickle-down government” to describe similar buck-passing in a 1991 speech to the National Association of Counties, though here there is also a hint that the ultimate fault might lie with the federal government for imposing burdensome mandates:

When your states are loaded up with new responsibilities and no way to pay for them, they usually play bucket brigade themselves and dump hand-me-down mandates on the counties and municipalities.



A Brief History Of “Trickle-Down Government”

Ronald Reagan is where the societal redistribution paradigm began.
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
Does that qualify him to be POTUS?
Well, we've tried career politicians for many, many decades, they all of been a failure

It's the system stupid. Where do you think your "career politicians" come from. That's right, the american public, from the system, and the public has rewarded this behavior pattern and offered its unwavering consent.
Single term limits would fix what ails, The problem IS the federal government all of corrupt behavior is due to the career politician. Dip shit

Pffffffffffffft, yeah sure, that'' alter everything won't it. Simpleton.
Staying the same with all the same fuck ups sure will help simpleton… LOL
 
Last edited:
Does that qualify him to be POTUS?
Well, we've tried career politicians for many, many decades, they all of been a failure

It's the system stupid. Where do you think your "career politicians" come from. That's right, the american public, from the system, and the public has rewarded this behavior pattern and offered its unwavering consent.
Single term limits would fix what ails, The problem IS the federal government all of corrupt behavior is due to the career politician. Dip shit

Pffffffffffffft, yeah sure, that'' alter everything won't it. Simpleton.
Staying the same with all the same fuck ups sure will help simple time… LOL

All the public ever had to do was withdraw its consent. But they can't. And the public needs someone to blame for their own participation in all they decry.
 
According to CNNMoney

Donald Trump has created about 34,000 jobs

All the whining from Democrats about "contributions" (taxes) is going to backfire.

That fact that it gets ANY tracticpn proves they are the Party of Stalin
So....hitlery un-employed more than 34,000 people....:lol:


The Left are so amusing. They decry Top Down Trickle Down economics (and job creators)...while promoting Big Government's Takeover of Everything.

Nothing is more top down than an authoritarian centralized government.

Just sayin'.

We all know who rolled trickle down onto society love.

No, apparently you don't. It was first used to describe GOVERNMENT SPENDING and UNFUNDED MANDATES.


The phrase appears within the AP reporter’s paraphrase of the L.A. Olympic committee’s argument (perhaps made by Ueberroth, perhaps made by someone else, but certainly consistent with what Ueberroth is quoted saying in the story) that $88 million in previously-unacknowledged federal subsidies for the games would be money well spent. The committee, AP reported, “has countered [arguments that U.S. taxpayers were getting ripped off] that the Games will generate millions in direct taxes and indirect, trickle-down government revenues.” In this context, then, “trickle-down government” is shorthand for government spending that has a stimulative multiplier effect on private-sector economic growth. Romney’s 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics, incidentally, ended up costing the federal government $342 million, which (after inflation) was two and a quarter times as much trickle-down government Keynesian stimulus as the $88 million described in the 1984 story.

Something very like the phrase “trickle-down government” is also used in a 1990 Newsday story. Here it's pejorative, but its meaning is to criticize the bait-and-switch devolution of government functions to state and local governments, which of course Romney very much favors:

New York and other older cities are suffering the most from the “trickle down” of government responsibility from the federal to the local level, notes Rae Rosen, an economist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. On top of everything else, city residents must now put up with tax increases and cutbacks in services and the “privatization of services” they used to take for granted, such as public schools, neighborhood security and even mail delivery. In other words, after paying more for less government, New Yorkers must shell out even more to live here.

Sen. Chuck Robb, D.-Va., uses the phrase “trickle-down government” to describe similar buck-passing in a 1991 speech to the National Association of Counties, though here there is also a hint that the ultimate fault might lie with the federal government for imposing burdensome mandates:

When your states are loaded up with new responsibilities and no way to pay for them, they usually play bucket brigade themselves and dump hand-me-down mandates on the counties and municipalities.



A Brief History Of “Trickle-Down Government”

Ronald Reagan is where the societal redistribution paradigm began.


You are sorely misguided, but I'll give you 10 Points For Consistency.
 
Well, we've tried career politicians for many, many decades, they all of been a failure

It's the system stupid. Where do you think your "career politicians" come from. That's right, the american public, from the system, and the public has rewarded this behavior pattern and offered its unwavering consent.
Single term limits would fix what ails, The problem IS the federal government all of corrupt behavior is due to the career politician. Dip shit

Pffffffffffffft, yeah sure, that'' alter everything won't it. Simpleton.
Staying the same with all the same fuck ups sure will help simple time… LOL

All the public ever had to do was withdraw its consent. But they can't. And the public needs someone to blame for their own participation in all they decry.
You're right, with the shitty ass voting percentage of the public the lemmings that just vote for the most visible candidate see: Obama. ''Hope and change" was a load of shit, you think anymore "hope and change" gonna fix anything? Lol
 
So....hitlery un-employed more than 34,000 people....:lol:


The Left are so amusing. They decry Top Down Trickle Down economics (and job creators)...while promoting Big Government's Takeover of Everything.

Nothing is more top down than an authoritarian centralized government.

Just sayin'.

We all know who rolled trickle down onto society love.

No, apparently you don't. It was first used to describe GOVERNMENT SPENDING and UNFUNDED MANDATES.


The phrase appears within the AP reporter’s paraphrase of the L.A. Olympic committee’s argument (perhaps made by Ueberroth, perhaps made by someone else, but certainly consistent with what Ueberroth is quoted saying in the story) that $88 million in previously-unacknowledged federal subsidies for the games would be money well spent. The committee, AP reported, “has countered [arguments that U.S. taxpayers were getting ripped off] that the Games will generate millions in direct taxes and indirect, trickle-down government revenues.” In this context, then, “trickle-down government” is shorthand for government spending that has a stimulative multiplier effect on private-sector economic growth. Romney’s 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics, incidentally, ended up costing the federal government $342 million, which (after inflation) was two and a quarter times as much trickle-down government Keynesian stimulus as the $88 million described in the 1984 story.

Something very like the phrase “trickle-down government” is also used in a 1990 Newsday story. Here it's pejorative, but its meaning is to criticize the bait-and-switch devolution of government functions to state and local governments, which of course Romney very much favors:

New York and other older cities are suffering the most from the “trickle down” of government responsibility from the federal to the local level, notes Rae Rosen, an economist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. On top of everything else, city residents must now put up with tax increases and cutbacks in services and the “privatization of services” they used to take for granted, such as public schools, neighborhood security and even mail delivery. In other words, after paying more for less government, New Yorkers must shell out even more to live here.

Sen. Chuck Robb, D.-Va., uses the phrase “trickle-down government” to describe similar buck-passing in a 1991 speech to the National Association of Counties, though here there is also a hint that the ultimate fault might lie with the federal government for imposing burdensome mandates:

When your states are loaded up with new responsibilities and no way to pay for them, they usually play bucket brigade themselves and dump hand-me-down mandates on the counties and municipalities.



A Brief History Of “Trickle-Down Government”

Ronald Reagan is where the societal redistribution paradigm began.


You are sorely misguided, but I'll give you 10 Points For Consistency.

Uh huh.
 
It's the system stupid. Where do you think your "career politicians" come from. That's right, the american public, from the system, and the public has rewarded this behavior pattern and offered its unwavering consent.
Single term limits would fix what ails, The problem IS the federal government all of corrupt behavior is due to the career politician. Dip shit

Pffffffffffffft, yeah sure, that'' alter everything won't it. Simpleton.
Staying the same with all the same fuck ups sure will help simple time… LOL

All the public ever had to do was withdraw its consent. But they can't. And the public needs someone to blame for their own participation in all they decry.
You're right, with the shitty ass voting percentage of the public the lemmings that just vote for the most visible candidate see: Obama. ''Hope and change" was a load of shit, you think anymore "hope and change" gonna fix anything? Lol

Like I said, Mr Public, Like I said, blame someone else.
 

Forum List

Back
Top