Trump files, jury sees classified files or Trump wins

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Uh... that was Joe Bidumb.

View attachment 921762

This baby trolling won't help you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ha ha ha......yall done f**ked up.

Cry it all out, son.

All that matters is that you finally agree with me. smart choice.

 

[WorldWatcher]

And most have gotten off rather lightly.........................BUT TRUMP.

Ex-VP Pence agrees.

WW

 

[rippy38]

This baby trolling won't help you.

You seem to call everyone that posts something you can't refute a "troll".

You were doing that the other day here too.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ex-VP Pence agrees.

WW

Pence and biden cooperated fully with the authorities.

Trump's charges arise from the fact that he did not.

 

[rippy38]

Ex-VP Pence agrees.

WW

That's only because they found classified docs at his house too.

LOL

 

[Marener]

The claim is they were declassified

No, it’s not.

 

[Care4all]

And most have gotten off rather lightly.........................BUT TRUMP.

Who got off lightly?

 

[Delldude]

Cry it all out, son.

Called your hand and you were holding 4 jokers.

Back on topic..............post 823......see for yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You seem to call everyone that posts something you can't refute a "troll".

This baby trolling will also not help you. Nobody has to refute your childish fantasies. that is not how the world works.

Now go argue with your sock account.That was really weird by the way.

 

[Delldude]

Who got off lightly?

Sandy Berger, who was caught stuffing classified doc's in his socks and pants, to erase some of the stuff Bill did, for one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Called your hand and you were holding 4 jokers.

Back on topic..............post 823......see for yourself.

Great, then you agree the jury does not need to see the contents of the documents, contrary to the judge's bizarre instructions.

Let's all enjoy this rare moment of normal, adult behavior from you.

 

[rippy38]

This baby trolling will also not help you. Nobody has to refute your childish fantasies. that is not how the world works.

Now go argue with your sock account.That was really weird by the way.

LOL

My point stands, and I accept your concession.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL

My point stands, and I accept your concession.

Of course you do. Because that's why you are here: to jerk off in public.

 

[rippy38]

Of course you do. Because that's why you are here: to jerk off in public.

Your baby trolling will not help you.

 

[Delldude]

Great, then you agree the jury does not need to see the contents of the documents contrary to the judge's bizarre instructions.

CASE NO. 23-80101-CR-CANNON

(a) In a prosecution of a former president for allegedly retaining documents in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 793(e), a jury is permitted to examine a record retained by a former president in
his/her personal possession at the end of his/her presidency and make a factual finding as
to whether the government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that it is personal or
presidential using the definitions set forth in the Presidential Records Act (PRA)

Doesn't detail what type of or what format of a record they can examine.

Epic fail.

Thanks for playing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Doesn't detail what type of or what format of a record they can examine.

Which means any kind, ya dummy. Slow down, you're rabid.

Yes, Cannon is arguing the jurors need to see the contents, so the can decide if they are valid personal records.

No, you do not understand this, apparently.

Shame. And it's your thread. Maybe you should learn about a topic before starting a thread on it.

 

[Delldude]

Yes, Cannon is arguing the jurors need to see the contents, so the can decide if they are valid personal records.

In what format?

 

[Delldude]

No, it’s not.

How can you be so sure?

 

[Marener]

How can you be so sure?

Because the court filings are public.