Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was being serious. Sorry, a dingbat website iss not goinng to change the Constitution. States have various ways of allocating their votes. If CA, for example, wishes to allocate their EC votes as ME and NE, they are free to do so. Now go take a showerActually a lot was done. Repealing the EC is difficult, but an interstate compact between states that total 270 or more electoral votes is being pursued so their votes will all go to whatever candidate wins the popular vote, regardless of how the states voted. They're up to 165 electoral votes. 105 more and it goes into place. I'm hoping the Trump crisis pushes us closer towards that goal.So what did you do about it. Start threads on USMB? Refuse to take a shower until it was changed? FFS, you and your affirmative action president and beast had 16 years. Sorry, it's just whining. Now go take a shower.I did. I've objected ever since the broken EC gave us what used to be the worst President of my lifetime in Dubya.You should have objected before the election, but we were so sure the Beast would win, eh? Now it's just whining borne of butthurt.Yeah the North would outnumber the South because the South's slaves weren't allowed to vote, so James Madison argued to reject a direct election system. And then the broken EC was born. What a system!The EC has not failed at all. It did exactly what it and the Senate were intended to do; provide the rights of states and check the power of urban elites and their urban flunkies.
Read the history of your own country.
National Popular Vote
Demo quacks?So THIS makes your day ? >>>This made my day. The third Federal Court to rule against the Trump Administration on DACA. And it was done so poetically
Another Federal Judge Rules Against Trump's Order To Cancel DACA | HuffPost
Harms of Immigration
1. Americans lose jobs.
2. Wage reduction.
3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).
4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($138 Billion year).
5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.
6. Increased crime.
7. Increased traffic congestion.
8. Increased pollution.
9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.
10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.
11. Overcrowding in government offices.
12. Overcrowding in schools.
13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.
14. Cultural erosion.
15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)
16. Introduction of foreign diseases.
17. Influx of terrorists (Ex. ISIS tucked in with "Syrian refugees")
Demoquacks don't know why they support anything, they've simply been told to support it. Mindless sheep
Guess you would deport the Muslim inventor of your iPhone?So THIS makes your day ? >>>This made my day. The third Federal Court to rule against the Trump Administration on DACA. And it was done so poetically
Another Federal Judge Rules Against Trump's Order To Cancel DACA | HuffPost
Harms of Immigration
1. Americans lose jobs.
2. Wage reduction.
3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).
4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($138 Billion year).
5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.
6. Increased crime.
7. Increased traffic congestion.
8. Increased pollution.
9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.
10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.
11. Overcrowding in government offices.
12. Overcrowding in schools.
13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.
14. Cultural erosion.
15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)
16. Introduction of foreign diseases.
17. Influx of terrorists (Ex. ISIS tucked in with "Syrian refugees")
Then it is true. Mexico is hostile to the US. Thanks for the confirmation.Criminals have killed many of them, yes. Like Constantino Morales, who fled to the U.S. when drug cartels threatened to murder him. He'd been a cop fighting against them, doing what was right. He was denied asylum and murdered by the cartel less than a month later. They tried to send his family to their deaths too, but I don't have an update on them.So Mexicans will kill those we send home? Really?People who want to wrench innocents away from their homes, to send them to their deaths in a foreign country they've never known; THAT is evil.So you see those who disagree as evil huh? Typical libtard.I sympathize with dreamers because they are innocent and terrified of losing the only home they've ever known. I sympathize with Americans, as with Dreamers, if they are good, well-meaning people. I can't say that about the writer of Post #2. Oh wait, was that you?So you sympathize more with the DACAs, than you do with Americans enduring the Harms of immigration listed in Post # 2, right ?
Demo quacks?So THIS makes your day ? >>>This made my day. The third Federal Court to rule against the Trump Administration on DACA. And it was done so poetically
Another Federal Judge Rules Against Trump's Order To Cancel DACA | HuffPost
Harms of Immigration
1. Americans lose jobs.
2. Wage reduction.
3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).
4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($138 Billion year).
5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.
6. Increased crime.
7. Increased traffic congestion.
8. Increased pollution.
9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.
10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.
11. Overcrowding in government offices.
12. Overcrowding in schools.
13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.
14. Cultural erosion.
15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)
16. Introduction of foreign diseases.
17. Influx of terrorists (Ex. ISIS tucked in with "Syrian refugees")
Demoquacks don't know why they support anything, they've simply been told to support it. Mindless sheep
Omg, such brilliance.
Sheep? I thought it was the short fingered vulgarian that said he could shoot someone on 5 th ave and his followers wouldn't care?
Heard of projection in your physch classes?
So THIS makes your day ? >>>
Harms of Immigration
1. Americans lose jobs.
2. Wage reduction.
3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).
4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($138 Billion year).
5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.
6. Increased crime.
7. Increased traffic congestion.
8. Increased pollution.
9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.
10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.
11. Overcrowding in government offices.
12. Overcrowding in schools.
13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.
14. Cultural erosion.
15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)
16. Introduction of foreign diseases.
17. Influx of terrorists (Ex. ISIS tucked in with "Syrian refugees")
Now let's see you try to substantiate that - for ANY one of the items on the list. Or is hot air more your speed ?You managed to regurgitate literally every myth about immigration and immigrants
Yay You!
Doesn't matter what they regard themselves. They're here illegally by lawbreaking, and shouldn't be here imposing the harms of immigration in the long list.We are talking about people who have been here since they were children and regard themselves as Americans. Terrorists ? Really ? What a joke.
hmmm...does the toddler get to keep the money?...or does it go back?If a toddler is in the back seat of Dad's car and Dad robs a bank .. is the toddler a criminal?
Take that BS elsewhere
Actually, NO YOU DON'T sympathize with Americans, because the Dreamers are imposing the Harms of Immigration upon them, and you are supporting that. You can't have it both ways.I sympathize with dreamers because they are innocent and terrified of losing the only home they've ever known. I sympathize with Americans, as with Dreamers, if they are good, well-meaning people. I can't say that about the writer of Post #2. Oh wait, was that you?
If we're a Christian nation, should we allow people to burglarize our homes ?If we are a Christian nation then surely these people can stay, they are already here...
Toddler would need to do solitary confinement.Doesn't matter what they regard themselves. They're here illegally by lawbreaking, and shouldn't be here imposing the harms of immigration in the long list.We are talking about people who have been here since they were children and regard themselves as Americans. Terrorists ? Really ? What a joke.
If a toddler is in the back seat of Dad's car and Dad robs a bank .. is the toddler a criminal?
Take that BS elsewhere
A small post. A big point.Funny how a federal judge can uphold illegal legislation.
Yes basically that is what Christ says to do...If we're a Christian nation, should we allow people to burglarize our homes ?If we are a Christian nation then surely these people can stay, they are already here...
Yeah cause I don't want to hear them cry.Toddler would need to do solitary confinement.Doesn't matter what they regard themselves. They're here illegally by lawbreaking, and shouldn't be here imposing the harms of immigration in the long list.We are talking about people who have been here since they were children and regard themselves as Americans. Terrorists ? Really ? What a joke.
If a toddler is in the back seat of Dad's car and Dad robs a bank .. is the toddler a criminal?
Take that BS elsewhere
What does the statement from the judge claim as precedent or deferment due to lack of subject objectification?Funny how a federal judge can uphold illegal legislation.
Now let's see you try to substantiate that - for ANY one of the items on the list. Or is hot air more your speed ?You managed to regurgitate literally every myth about immigration and immigrants
Yay You!
Yes basically that is what Christ says to do...
Chris supported>> "Thou shalt not steal."
