Trump has had criminal investigations for the past 40 years. Why do republicans pretend he is innocent on all of them?

Indictments don't prove a thing, dumbass.
Funny how you MAGAt Trumptards keep moving your own goalposts.
First it was "Arrested for what?"
"He hasn't even been charged with a crime?"
And now it's "Indictments don't prove a thing dumbass."
Well yeah, they do.
They prove that enough evidence has been presented to a grand jury to charge him with crimes.
Multiple crimes.

So there you go.
Anymore stupid questions dumbass?
 
Was he charged with any of them? Did he have court cases brought forth of any of them? If not, he's not guilty on any of them. And, as a judge would say, anything in the past has no bearing with the present case. The recent allegation hasn't gone anywhere in New York either. Bragg is just grasping at straws. Grand Jury indictments are not guilty pleas. The prosecution puts forth their allegations but the person being looked at does not have that opportunity nor do they get to counter interrogate Cohen and other liars. Brag still doesn't have to take him to court either just because of the grand jury.
And, Joe Biden is fair game to bring up. So is Hillary as well.
Lol oh I see they are fair to bring up but you are pretending to have the same attitude you do about Trump and his cases not going to trial?
 
Funny how you MAGAt Trumptards keep moving your own goalposts.
First it was "Arrested for what?"
"He hasn't even been charged with a crime?"
When I said that he hadn't been charged with anything.

And now it's "Indictments don't prove a thing dumbass."
How is hta tmoving the goal posts?

Well yeah, they do.
They prove that enough evidence has been presented to a grand jury to charge him with crimes.
Multiple crimes.
Not in the case of some sleazy corrupt Democrat DA. They prove nothing.

So there you go.
Anymore stupid questions dumbass?
How did progsa all become so delusional?
 
Funny how you MAGAt Trumptards keep moving your own goalposts.
First it was "Arrested for what?"
"He hasn't even been charged with a crime?"
And now it's "Indictments don't prove a thing dumbass."
Well yeah, they do.
They prove that enough evidence has been presented to a grand jury to charge him with crimes.
Multiple crimes.

So there you go.
Anymore stupid questions dumbass?

What’s even funnier is you’ve been trying to indict Trump for over seven years and now you think you’ve got him. When are you gullible loons going to figure out you’re being played ?
 
To be clear, I don’t necessarily believe he’s guilty on everything in the past 4 decades, but that kind of objectivity is not mirrored by republicans it seems.

I’ll just ask this to republicans: do you believe that Trump has been guilty of at least ONE criminal offense allegation in the past 40 years that the article describes or is he completely innocent of those specific allegations? Keep in mind that he wasn’t involved in politics as late as 12 years ago so the persecution excuse won’t work.

Don’t do the “but Biden!” thing in your answer. Just straight up answer the question.

You want a straight up answer?

Trump's guilt or innocence is not the issue. Not by a long shot. Not even for a minute.

ABUSE OF THE LAW is the issue.

Abuse, as in CORRUPTION.

That's the issue.
 
The indictment is for politics asswipe. Wake up TDS inflicted loon.
What exactly is that supposed to mean?
"For politics?"
The indictment is the result of a Grand Jury being presented with enough EVIDENCE to charge the orange cat turd king with crimes.
Period.
That is just how the law works.
For everybody.
Do you think Trump should be some exception?
And if so why?
 

Forum List

Back
Top