Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BBBUUUTTTT Socialism really will work this time....dumb asses
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
I'm all for being able to make my own wealth w/o government interference or controls. You want to be rich get off your dead ass and make it happen
Or, I don't know...actually replying to the post you quoted. But, sure, let's pretend you're rich.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
I'm all for being able to make my own wealth w/o government interference or controls. You want to be rich get off your dead ass and make it happen
Or, I don't know...actually replying to the post you quoted. But, sure, let's pretend you're rich.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
I'm all for being able to make my own wealth w/o government interference or controls. You want to be rich get off your dead ass and make it happen
Or, I don't know...actually replying to the post you quoted. But, sure, let's pretend you're rich.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
I'm all for being able to make my own wealth w/o government interference or controls. You want to be rich get off your dead ass and make it happen
Or, I don't know...actually replying to the post you quoted. But, sure, let's pretend you're rich.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
Or, I don't know...actually replying to the post you quoted. But, sure, let's pretend you're rich.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
Mathew is far left drone like you..
And even a two year old knows you can not prove a negative..
Silly far left drone!
Fear of Sanders is getting very entertaining.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
Mathew is far left drone like you..
And even a two year old knows you can not prove a negative..
Silly far left drone!
Please show me the country that doesn't tax the tax payers to pay for the roads, infrastructure(including the police, schools, etc) and regulate the economy at all.
Fear of Sanders is getting very entertaining.
The close she gets to clink.......suddenly your all Sanders all the time. sheez.
Fear of Sanders is getting very entertaining.
The close she gets to clink.......suddenly your all Sanders all the time. sheez.
Germany has universal healthcare, high wages, free education, a lot of vacation time, strong unions and half the debt per citizen compared to the USA.
Or, I don't know...actually replying to the post you quoted. But, sure, let's pretend you're rich.
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
The government has too much in the way it regulates the private sector and it inhibits growth. He's correct the US is a form of social democracy but the problem is too many want to start going towards the social part and forget the democracy part. Nobody owes you, Matthew or anyone else a damn thing, not one damn thing. The less the government interferes the better. It all boils down to jealousy, inability to create wealth and laziness. There has never been a socialist economy that has survived....and there never will be because every time they run out of other people's money and it implodes upon itself
Now, how do you and your ilk plan to pay for Sander's proposals? We'll start with the 28 trillion he needs for his pie in the sky healthcare plans
Americans also like plentiful jobs. I haven't seen any of those in a while.
America likes paved roads, science institutions, the ability to send their kid to public school and a safetynet. The idea that the loserterians compare the system of most of civilization too Venezuela is laughable to say the least.
Also can you please show me what hyper-inflation America or europe has seen these past 4 years?
Germany has universal healthcare, high wages, free education, a lot of vacation time, strong unions and half the debt per citizen compared to the USA.
Germany's industrial production is at zero percent growth, consumer confidence is tanking and it's social services is being taxed to the max. I'd use a different example if I were you
You don't know me so you can pretend all you want. Stop being an asinine trollish pain in the ass and try sticking to the topic.Understand?
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
The government has too much in the way it regulates the private sector and it inhibits growth. He's correct the US is a form of social democracy but the problem is too many want to start going towards the social part and forget the democracy part. Nobody owes you, Matthew or anyone else a damn thing, not one damn thing. The less the government interferes the better. It all boils down to jealousy, inability to create wealth and laziness. There has never been a socialist economy that has survived....and there never will be because every time they run out of other people's money and it implodes upon itself
Now, how do you and your ilk plan to pay for Sander's proposals? We'll start with the 28 trillion he needs for his pie in the sky healthcare plans
There has never been a socialist economy that has survived? That's not true. Why don't you tell us of the last strictly free market capitalist society that has survived with no government regulation. And, as you've already stated we don;'t qualify, we already have regulations and have socialist policies. So, good luck, sweetheart, look forward to you avoiding the question.
Germany has universal healthcare, high wages, free education, a lot of vacation time, strong unions and half the debt per citizen compared to the USA.
Germany's industrial production is at zero percent growth, consumer confidence is tanking and it's social services is being taxed to the max. I'd use a different example if I were you
Except of the last 10 quarters, Germany has seen a growth in GDP in 9 of them.
Speaking of sticking to the subject, that's what I was calling you out on. You ignored the poster's point that you were quoting, I'm pointing it out to you. You still haven't addressed it.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
The government has too much in the way it regulates the private sector and it inhibits growth. He's correct the US is a form of social democracy but the problem is too many want to start going towards the social part and forget the democracy part. Nobody owes you, Matthew or anyone else a damn thing, not one damn thing. The less the government interferes the better. It all boils down to jealousy, inability to create wealth and laziness. There has never been a socialist economy that has survived....and there never will be because every time they run out of other people's money and it implodes upon itself
Now, how do you and your ilk plan to pay for Sander's proposals? We'll start with the 28 trillion he needs for his pie in the sky healthcare plans
There has never been a socialist economy that has survived? That's not true. Why don't you tell us of the last strictly free market capitalist society that has survived with no government regulation. And, as you've already stated we don;'t qualify, we already have regulations and have socialist policies. So, good luck, sweetheart, look forward to you avoiding the question.
Name the Socialist economy that survived? I won't wait, that is Econ 101
Also answer my question, how will you pay the 28 trillion,,,,,,,sweetheart? Take that condescending BS and stick it up your ass, You don't impress me
Fear of Sanders is getting very entertaining.
The close she gets to clink.......suddenly your all Sanders all the time. sheez.
Don't lie about me and what I've believed, and when. Retard.
Which point and which poster? You're all nilly willy and attempted to try and hurl an insult you know nothing of? If it's Matthew he's a clueless moron that couldn't create wealth if his very life depended on it, he expects the government to fulfill his needs and wants the rich to take care of him....hence a socialist
This from Matthew:
We've always been a social democracy. The closes we may have come to your world is 1890's. The government has some say in the economy, regulates and the private sector has to respect the rights of its workers.
Name a single successful nation that isn't today???
Please show me where a pure capitalist system that works without the rich having 95% of all the wealth?
Take your time, you're good at it.
The government has too much in the way it regulates the private sector and it inhibits growth. He's correct the US is a form of social democracy but the problem is too many want to start going towards the social part and forget the democracy part. Nobody owes you, Matthew or anyone else a damn thing, not one damn thing. The less the government interferes the better. It all boils down to jealousy, inability to create wealth and laziness. There has never been a socialist economy that has survived....and there never will be because every time they run out of other people's money and it implodes upon itself
Now, how do you and your ilk plan to pay for Sander's proposals? We'll start with the 28 trillion he needs for his pie in the sky healthcare plans
There has never been a socialist economy that has survived? That's not true. Why don't you tell us of the last strictly free market capitalist society that has survived with no government regulation. And, as you've already stated we don;'t qualify, we already have regulations and have socialist policies. So, good luck, sweetheart, look forward to you avoiding the question.
Name the Socialist economy that survived? I won't wait, that is Econ 101
Also answer my question, how will you pay the 28 trillion,,,,,,,sweetheart? Take that condescending BS and stick it up your ass, You don't impress me
Most of Europe and according to you the United States. How are we goiing to pay for the shit Trump wants to do? How did we pay for Bush's wars? Let's get shit under control first. Did you even understand Matthew's post to begin with?
