Vermont Senate unanimously approves gun removal bill

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,764
2,040
Vermont Senate unanimously approves gun removal bill
MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) The Vermont Senate has approved a bill that would allow police to take firearms and explosives from people judged to be an extreme risk to themselves or others. The Fair Haven case brought new urgency to the gun control debate and the measure had wide support from lawmakers, who approved it on a unanimous 30-0 vote.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone can easily, easily be given a mental disorder !! They already have it where if you want to eat healthy it's a mental illness.

The dangers are instant with this bs soon to be law , and something the left , right zombies don't get let alone believe THEY CAN ACCUSE YOU OF HAVING A MENTAL ILLNESS" AS EASILY AS YOU CAN SPIT.
Mental Illness is going to be used as a weapon against you be it you are mentally ill or not.

All it is going to take is a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"........... so now in their eyes you are mentally ill and the pathetic public believes this is the case.......

This is how stupid these asses are remove the guns really ...... SURE DID CHICAGO a lot of good, as they have one of the highest murder rates in the Country....... are you politicians this stupid. wth is wrong with you stupid asses.


Gawd dam you freaking idiot better wake the hell up.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Hearsay is the new court of law in Vermont. Awesome.

Wait until the idiots see their state turning into slaughter houses. LMFAO

upload_2018-3-2_8-6-14.png


Bill Status S.221
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
what trump wants, trump gets

It's the state's choice ding dong.......... same method used as pot. Can he never make you Trump haters happy anyway no.
Take the guns you rip him up, keep the gun you rip him.......... way to go hero.
 
Last edited:
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.

Did you miss where I said " you can be titled to having a mental illness" however they see fit.

So right now if you were to believe eating healthy was good for your body............... , later you decide to buy a gun or lets say a car they tell you , you can't buy either one because you have a mental illness" .. Hows that going to feel when you know dam well you are not mentally ill.


If they can use mental illness as a weapon to take from people how will they use it next time they want to take from the people. C'mon THINK!
 
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.
Just because it is working in your area, doesnt mean it would work well in other areas. What if the local PD and judge wanted the area to be disarmed?
Im just saying it could happen. Hypotheticals are why we have the Constitution in the first place. To keep that bad shit from happening..
 
Vermont Senate unanimously approves gun removal bill
MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) The Vermont Senate has approved a bill that would allow police to take firearms and explosives from people judged to be an extreme risk to themselves or others. The Fair Haven case brought new urgency to the gun control debate and the measure had wide support from lawmakers, who approved it on a unanimous 30-0 vote.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone can easily, easily be given a mental disorder !! They already have it where if you want to eat healthy it's a mental illness.

The dangers are instant with this bs soon to be law , and something the left , right zombies don't get let alone believe THEY CAN ACCUSE YOU OF HAVING A MENTAL ILLNESS" AS EASILY AS YOU CAN SPIT.
Mental Illness is going to be used as a weapon against you be it you are mentally ill or not.

All it is going to take is a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"........... so now in their eyes you are mentally ill and the pathetic public believes this is the case.......

This is how stupid these asses are remove the guns really ...... SURE DID CHICAGO a lot of good, as they have one of the highest murder rates in the Country....... are you politicians this stupid. wth is wrong with you stupid asses.


Gawd dam you freaking idiot better wake the hell up.
/-----/ Would that apply to Climate Change deniers, registered Republicans and returning Vets?
 
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.

This is from 2013 :

PSYCHIATRY AS A WEAPON OF TYRANNY



I have written extensively about the horrendous and ongoing efforts by the Veterans Administration to disarm American military veterans by declaring them incompetent to handle their financial affairs due to physical or mental disabilities. Once declared incompetent the veterans are arbitrarily stripped of their Second Amendment right to purchase, own, or possess a firearm.

PSYCHIATRY AS A WEAPON OF TYRANNY | Connelly

Control the FOOD control the PEOPLE

Control the oil Control the people

the list grows and grows..
 
Vermont Senate unanimously approves gun removal bill
MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) The Vermont Senate has approved a bill that would allow police to take firearms and explosives from people judged to be an extreme risk to themselves or others. The Fair Haven case brought new urgency to the gun control debate and the measure had wide support from lawmakers, who approved it on a unanimous 30-0 vote.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone can easily, easily be given a mental disorder !! They already have it where if you want to eat healthy it's a mental illness.

The dangers are instant with this bs soon to be law , and something the left , right zombies don't get let alone believe THEY CAN ACCUSE YOU OF HAVING A MENTAL ILLNESS" AS EASILY AS YOU CAN SPIT.
Mental Illness is going to be used as a weapon against you be it you are mentally ill or not.

All it is going to take is a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"........... so now in their eyes you are mentally ill and the pathetic public believes this is the case.......

This is how stupid these asses are remove the guns really ...... SURE DID CHICAGO a lot of good, as they have one of the highest murder rates in the Country....... are you politicians this stupid. wth is wrong with you stupid asses.


Gawd dam you freaking idiot better wake the hell up.
/-----/ Would that apply to Climate Change deniers, registered Republicans and returning Vets?

yep LOL
 
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.

Did you miss where I said " you can be titled to having a mental illness" however they see fit.

So right now if you were to believe eating healthy was good for your body............... , later you decide to buy a gun or lets say a car they tell you , you can't buy either one because you have a mental illness" .. Hows that going to feel when you know dam well you are not mentally ill.


If they can use mental illness as a weapon to take from people how will they use it next time they want to take from the people. C'mon THINK!
/----/ We need a new classification for Gun Grabbers. How about Confiscation Deniers?
 
Hearsay is the new court of law in Vermont. Awesome.

Wait until the idiots see their state turning into slaughter houses. LMFAO

View attachment 179865

Bill Status S.221
Slaughter houses? I should have known better than to enter one of your fantasy threads. Didn't notice it was you until it was too late.
Good for Vermont. It will save lives. Arm the police with the ability to remove arms from the dangerously mentally ill. Could have saved 17 lives in Florida.
 
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.

Did you miss where I said " you can be titled to having a mental illness" however they see fit.

So right now if you were to believe eating healthy was good for your body............... , later you decide to buy a gun or lets say a car they tell you , you can't buy either one because you have a mental illness" .. Hows that going to feel when you know dam well you are not mentally ill.


If they can use mental illness as a weapon to take from people how will they use it next time they want to take from the people. C'mon THINK!
If you believe that eating healthy is good for your body, no one will know your opinion to take your guns away.

Now if you believe that eating healthy is good for your body and you put a video on you tube that shows you cutting yourself and announcing that you are going to kill everyone who doesn't eat healthy, it crosses a line.
 
Hearsay is the new court of law in Vermont. Awesome.

Wait until the idiots see their state turning into slaughter houses. LMFAO

View attachment 179865

Bill Status S.221
Slaughter houses? I should have known better than to enter one of your fantasy threads. Didn't notice it was you until it was too late.
Good for Vermont. It will save lives. Arm the police with the ability to remove arms from the dangerously mentally ill. Could have saved 17 lives in Florida.

Your PHD training has you being one of them. Stockholm syndrome won't ever allow you to see with common sense nor logic it left you a long, long time ago.
 
Hearsay is the new court of law in Vermont. Awesome.

Wait until the idiots see their state turning into slaughter houses. LMFAO

View attachment 179865

Bill Status S.221
Slaughter houses? I should have known better than to enter one of your fantasy threads. Didn't notice it was you until it was too late.
Good for Vermont. It will save lives. Arm the police with the ability to remove arms from the dangerously mentally ill. Could have saved 17 lives in Florida.


IF YOUR LUCKY maybe you can live in their slaughter houses, just like Chicago, Ny , who have the highest murder rates in the Country oh and the strictest gun laws in the Country and the murder rates omg anyone who wants this a complete idiot.
 
The article behind the link says law enforcement can seek an order of public protection from a judge, who would first order the subject person's guns taken for 14 days, and if an evaluation showed that person was a danger to the public or themselves could renew the order for 60 days, twice.
It hardly sounds like " a leftist GUN HATING MENTAL HELATH DR. saying you have a mental health issue all because you are an AMERICAN, FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOT"..has any part in the process at all.

I am all for an armed public. I go about armed always, except where prohibited by law. So this opinion comes from a "pro gun nut".
I think this might be a step in the right direction to protect the public.
What we have now is obviously not protecting the public. We have simular laws where I live, put in place since some looney shot a congresscritter in Tucson. So far it seems to be working better than what we had before, and there have been no complaints of abuse of the law by anyone who has been the subject of a mental health review.

Did you miss where I said " you can be titled to having a mental illness" however they see fit.

So right now if you were to believe eating healthy was good for your body............... , later you decide to buy a gun or lets say a car they tell you , you can't buy either one because you have a mental illness" .. Hows that going to feel when you know dam well you are not mentally ill.


If they can use mental illness as a weapon to take from people how will they use it next time they want to take from the people. C'mon THINK!
Exactly. They already found a way to label adolescence a mental disorder. Now they call it ADD. Now They'll just come up some new "ism" that makes note of opposing beliefs, or proclivities, and "Viola"!!! You have a "mental disorder". Now hand over your weapons...
 

Forum List

Back
Top