Video: “F*cking Cities Will Burn’ If Trump Gets Reelected” – O’Keefe Releases Teaser Of First 2020..

Nape. He edited the tape dishonestly --- what does he do that isn't done that way --- and portrayed the employee as complicit. That employee could see, as anyone could, that this klown in ridiculous getup was probably insane, and played along to get information out of him which he then took to the authorities. He paid that fine because he was liable. You don't "buy" your way out of liability; that ain't how it works.

Or are you suggesting O'Keefe paid the man $100,000 for his collection of Spider Man comics?
Uh, no. He paid him for secretly recording him.

You don't "pay" your smear subject for that. You get charged with a crime by the state.
Was he charged with a crime claiming he edited the tape?

EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.
Defamation through editing is...

It is if you file suit. And the victim did.

That's entirely separate from what the state could charge (but didn't) for surreptitious recording. You could smear without surreptitious recording, and you could surreptitiously record without smearing. O'Klepto chose to do both, and he paid for his choice.
 
Nape. He edited the tape dishonestly --- what does he do that isn't done that way --- and portrayed the employee as complicit. That employee could see, as anyone could, that this klown in ridiculous getup was probably insane, and played along to get information out of him which he then took to the authorities. He paid that fine because he was liable. You don't "buy" your way out of liability; that ain't how it works.

Or are you suggesting O'Keefe paid the man $100,000 for his collection of Spider Man comics?
Uh, no. He paid him for secretly recording him.

You don't "pay" your smear subject for that. You get charged with a crime by the state.
Was he charged with a crime claiming he edited the tape?

EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.

Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?
 
It can't be a surprise that the same people that wanted to overthrow the 2016 election before Trump took office would support mass violence if their candidate loses.

Elections are the enemy of Fascism.
 
Uh, no. He paid him for secretly recording him.

You don't "pay" your smear subject for that. You get charged with a crime by the state.
Was he charged with a crime claiming he edited the tape?

EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.

Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders. It was filmed in Iowa.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?
 
You don't "pay" your smear subject for that. You get charged with a crime by the state.
Was he charged with a crime claiming he edited the tape?

EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.

Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?
He's doing what progressive vermin always do, deflecting and thread derailing.
 
Why would anyone take this lying felon seriously.? O’Keefe has been proven to be a fraud over and over again.

But then again, O’Keefe fans are the same people who support the biggest fraud and liar ever elected president.

Sucks to be outed as an anarchist, amiright?

What was your excuse for the Biden Extortion videotape? Try that one here
 
You don't "pay" your smear subject for that. You get charged with a crime by the state.
Was he charged with a crime claiming he edited the tape?

EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.

Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders. It was filmed in Iowa.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?

:banghead:

DIRECTLY from my link in post 45:

>> It seems that the master of the cleverly edited—if highly deceptive—video reel is now being required to pay the sum of $100,000 to Juan Carlos Vera, a one time California employee of ACORN. Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

While Mr. Vera had no idea he was being surreptitiously video taped—which is not surprising given that California law expressly bars the secret recording of one’s voice or image—there was also something Mr. O’Keefe did not know until after he released the damaging video of his conversation with Vera for broadcast. As soon as O’Keefe and his partner-in-crime left the ACORN location, Mr. Vera called the police to report the entire incident. It turns out that Vera had been playing along with O’Keefe in an effort to ensnare O'Keefe and Giles whom Vera believed were in the act of breaking the law by proposing to engage in the importing of young women to become prostitutes.

Oops.

... A report issued by the California Attorney General in 2010 revealed that O’Keefe and Giles were given immunity from prosecution (a serious mistake in my opinion) in exchange for turning over the complete and unedited tapes that O’Keefe shot in Los Angeles, San Francisco and National City where O’Keefe worked his magic on Juan Carlos Vera.<<

Think that's "Los Angeles, Iowa"?

SMGDFH
 
It is if you file suit. And the victim did.

That's entirely separate from what the state could charge (but didn't) for surreptitious recording. You could smear without surreptitious recording, and you could surreptitiously record without smearing. O'Klepto chose to do both, and he paid for his choice.
He should sue O'Keef for "Definition of Character ".
 
Was he charged with a crime claiming he edited the tape?

EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.

Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders. It was filmed in Iowa.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?

:banghead:

DIRECTLY from my link in post 45:

>> It seems that the master of the cleverly edited—if highly deceptive—video reel is now being required to pay the sum of $100,000 to Juan Carlos Vera, a one time California employee of ACORN. Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

While Mr. Vera had no idea he was being surreptitiously video taped—which is not surprising given that California law expressly bars the secret recording of one’s voice or image—there was also something Mr. O’Keefe did not know until after he released the damaging video of his conversation with Vera for broadcast. As soon as O’Keefe and his partner-in-crime left the ACORN location, Mr. Vera called the police to report the entire incident. It turns out that Vera had been playing along with O’Keefe in an effort to ensnare O'Keefe and Giles whom Vera believed were in the act of breaking the law by proposing to engage in the importing of young women to become prostitutes.

Oops.

... A report issued by the California Attorney General in 2010 revealed that O’Keefe and Giles were given immunity from prosecution (a serious mistake in my opinion) in exchange for turning over the complete and unedited tapes that O’Keefe shot in Los Angeles, San Francisco and National City where O’Keefe worked his magic on Juan Carlos Vera.<<

SMGDFH

The thread isn't even about some Bernie cuck from California. It's about Kyle Jurek, a Sanders campaign staffer working out of the Iowa office who is calling for cities to “burn” if President Donald Trump is reelected.

Try to stay on topic, if you can.
 
EDITING is not a crime. Recording someone without their knowledge is.

Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders. It was filmed in Iowa.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?

:banghead:

DIRECTLY from my link in post 45:

>> It seems that the master of the cleverly edited—if highly deceptive—video reel is now being required to pay the sum of $100,000 to Juan Carlos Vera, a one time California employee of ACORN. Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

While Mr. Vera had no idea he was being surreptitiously video taped—which is not surprising given that California law expressly bars the secret recording of one’s voice or image—there was also something Mr. O’Keefe did not know until after he released the damaging video of his conversation with Vera for broadcast. As soon as O’Keefe and his partner-in-crime left the ACORN location, Mr. Vera called the police to report the entire incident. It turns out that Vera had been playing along with O’Keefe in an effort to ensnare O'Keefe and Giles whom Vera believed were in the act of breaking the law by proposing to engage in the importing of young women to become prostitutes.

Oops.

... A report issued by the California Attorney General in 2010 revealed that O’Keefe and Giles were given immunity from prosecution (a serious mistake in my opinion) in exchange for turning over the complete and unedited tapes that O’Keefe shot in Los Angeles, San Francisco and National City where O’Keefe worked his magic on Juan Carlos Vera.<<

SMGDFH

The thread isn't even about some Bernie cuck from California. It's about Kyle Jurek, a Sanders campaign staffer working out of the Iowa office who is calling for cities to “burn” if President Donald Trump is reelected.

Try to stay on topic, if you can.

The whole fucking thread is based on charlatan-worship, which I called out for what it is. Said charlatan's name is right above in the thread title. I've posted nothing about any fucking "Iowa", jackwagon. Go learn how to read.
 
Wrong again, liar. The video was recorded in Iowa.

Iowa
– If the person listening or recording is a sender or recipient of the communication, or is openly present and participating in the conversation, the communication can be recorded without the consent of the other parties. Individuals cannot legally record conversations while not present.

State-by-State Recording Laws

Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders. It was filmed in Iowa.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?

:banghead:

DIRECTLY from my link in post 45:

>> It seems that the master of the cleverly edited—if highly deceptive—video reel is now being required to pay the sum of $100,000 to Juan Carlos Vera, a one time California employee of ACORN. Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

While Mr. Vera had no idea he was being surreptitiously video taped—which is not surprising given that California law expressly bars the secret recording of one’s voice or image—there was also something Mr. O’Keefe did not know until after he released the damaging video of his conversation with Vera for broadcast. As soon as O’Keefe and his partner-in-crime left the ACORN location, Mr. Vera called the police to report the entire incident. It turns out that Vera had been playing along with O’Keefe in an effort to ensnare O'Keefe and Giles whom Vera believed were in the act of breaking the law by proposing to engage in the importing of young women to become prostitutes.

Oops.

... A report issued by the California Attorney General in 2010 revealed that O’Keefe and Giles were given immunity from prosecution (a serious mistake in my opinion) in exchange for turning over the complete and unedited tapes that O’Keefe shot in Los Angeles, San Francisco and National City where O’Keefe worked his magic on Juan Carlos Vera.<<

SMGDFH

The thread isn't even about some Bernie cuck from California. It's about Kyle Jurek, a Sanders campaign staffer working out of the Iowa office who is calling for cities to “burn” if President Donald Trump is reelected.

Try to stay on topic, if you can.

The whole fucking thread is based on charlatan-worship, which I called out for what it is. Said charlatan's name is right above in the thread title. I've posted nothing about any fucking "Iowa", jackwagon. Go learn how to read.

Are we triggered now? :21:
 
Why would anyone take this lying felon seriously.? O’Keefe has been proven to be a fraud over and over again.

But then again, O’Keefe fans are the same people who support the biggest fraud and liar ever elected president.

Hidden cameras do not lie!
Yeah they do, especially if you manipulate them.

The 33-year-old who tried to trick the Washington Post with a fake sexual harassment story has a long history of sting operations backfiring


LMMFAO YOU ARE SO SO SO SO FKN STUPID MAN OMFG YOU BELIEVE THIS GAWD DDAM SHIT NO WONDER YOU ARE A FKN MORON!!!!! LOOK AT THE INFORMATION YOU BELIEVE WHEN THESE C....TS CAN'T EVEN PROVIDE PROOF NOR FACTS STUPID SOB!!
 
Fun Fact: California is not located in Iowa.

Wanna see it on a map?


What the hell are you talking about? The "cities will burn" comment was from Kyle Jure, the Iowa field organizer for Sanders. It was filmed in Iowa.

Where the hell did you come up with "California"?

:banghead:

DIRECTLY from my link in post 45:

>> It seems that the master of the cleverly edited—if highly deceptive—video reel is now being required to pay the sum of $100,000 to Juan Carlos Vera, a one time California employee of ACORN. Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

Mr. Vera had been portrayed by O’Keefe as being a willing participant when O’Keefe and his accomplice, Hanna Giles, proposed smuggling young women into the United States to work as prostitutes.

While Mr. Vera had no idea he was being surreptitiously video taped—which is not surprising given that California law expressly bars the secret recording of one’s voice or image—there was also something Mr. O’Keefe did not know until after he released the damaging video of his conversation with Vera for broadcast. As soon as O’Keefe and his partner-in-crime left the ACORN location, Mr. Vera called the police to report the entire incident. It turns out that Vera had been playing along with O’Keefe in an effort to ensnare O'Keefe and Giles whom Vera believed were in the act of breaking the law by proposing to engage in the importing of young women to become prostitutes.

Oops.

... A report issued by the California Attorney General in 2010 revealed that O’Keefe and Giles were given immunity from prosecution (a serious mistake in my opinion) in exchange for turning over the complete and unedited tapes that O’Keefe shot in Los Angeles, San Francisco and National City where O’Keefe worked his magic on Juan Carlos Vera.<<

SMGDFH

The thread isn't even about some Bernie cuck from California. It's about Kyle Jurek, a Sanders campaign staffer working out of the Iowa office who is calling for cities to “burn” if President Donald Trump is reelected.

Try to stay on topic, if you can.

The whole fucking thread is based on charlatan-worship, which I called out for what it is. Said charlatan's name is right above in the thread title. I've posted nothing about any fucking "Iowa", jackwagon. Go learn how to read.

Are we triggered now? :21:

You seem to be. I've said once, and 100 times over. Cult45: Dumb as dirt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top