Viktor Shokin: Biden outraged we seized Burisma assets

[progressive hunter]

It doesn't matter if Biden was (in July) the strongest anything. It was months away from the vote of the people. He was not Trump's rival, and may not be by the time of the primary election. Saying he would be and basing an impeachment on this fortune telling is what's one would call a phony excuse.

The first Thought Police impeachment in our history.

He does not have to be on the ticket yet to be a rival, political ads start up long before primaries. Again, it is a pathetic excuse for bad behavior.

Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters. Assuming Biden is going to be the nominee is not solid grounds to impeach a President on. And what will you say if they impeach Trump, and Sanders or Warren gets the nomination?

It's real simple: Biden is Trump's rival or he is not. If he is, for Democrats to make the case, cancel all future debates, and nominate him without the vote of their constituents. After all, they know it's going to be Biden anyway, so the voters won't get upset.

"Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters."

You have a mental disorder. There's simply no other reason you could post such nonsense after all the discussion on this matter to date.

No, dumbfuck, it means Trump can't solicit foreign aid to investigate any of the candidates for president. It doesn't mean they're off limits otherwise.

Savvy?

POTUS has a duty to investigate corruption regardless of who they are,,,its not his fault joe was running for office,,

Not if he has to break the law to do so. The president is not above, or below, the law.

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

 

[Faun]

Bull. Biden is regarded as the strongest candidate and most likely to beat Trump. That makes him a rival. These word ga.es are just pathetic attempts excuse his behavior.

Hmmm out of ALL the corruption in Ukraine he just happens to ask them to announce an investigation on Biden.

It doesn't matter if Biden was (in July) the strongest anything. It was months away from the vote of the people. He was not Trump's rival, and may not be by the time of the primary election. Saying he would be and basing an impeachment on this fortune telling is what's one would call a phony excuse.

The first Thought Police impeachment in our history.

He does not have to be on the ticket yet to be a rival, political ads start up long before primaries. Again, it is a pathetic excuse for bad behavior.

Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters. Assuming Biden is going to be the nominee is not solid grounds to impeach a President on. And what will you say if they impeach Trump, and Sanders or Warren gets the nomination?

It's real simple: Biden is Trump's rival or he is not. If he is, for Democrats to make the case, cancel all future debates, and nominate him without the vote of their constituents. After all, they know it's going to be Biden anyway, so the voters won't get upset.

"Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters."

You have a mental disorder. There's simply no other reason you could post such nonsense after all the discussion on this matter to date.

No, dumbfuck, it means Trump can't solicit foreign aid to investigate any of the candidates for president. It doesn't mean they're off limits otherwise.

Savvy?

So , example given, if El Chapo were to declare his candidacy for the Presidency, the President couldn't ask the Mexican government to investigate them.

El Chapo is ineligible to be president so your example fails before it even gets started.

 

[Faun]

He does not have to be on the ticket yet to be a rival, political ads start up long before primaries. Again, it is a pathetic excuse for bad behavior.

Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters. Assuming Biden is going to be the nominee is not solid grounds to impeach a President on. And what will you say if they impeach Trump, and Sanders or Warren gets the nomination?

It's real simple: Biden is Trump's rival or he is not. If he is, for Democrats to make the case, cancel all future debates, and nominate him without the vote of their constituents. After all, they know it's going to be Biden anyway, so the voters won't get upset.

"Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters."

You have a mental disorder. There's simply no other reason you could post such nonsense after all the discussion on this matter to date.

No, dumbfuck, it means Trump can't solicit foreign aid to investigate any of the candidates for president. It doesn't mean they're off limits otherwise.

Savvy?

POTUS has a duty to investigate corruption regardless of who they are,,,its not his fault joe was running for office,,

Not if he has to break the law to do so. The president is not above, or below, the law.

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

 

[progressive hunter]

Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters. Assuming Biden is going to be the nominee is not solid grounds to impeach a President on. And what will you say if they impeach Trump, and Sanders or Warren gets the nomination?

It's real simple: Biden is Trump's rival or he is not. If he is, for Democrats to make the case, cancel all future debates, and nominate him without the vote of their constituents. After all, they know it's going to be Biden anyway, so the voters won't get upset.

"Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters."

You have a mental disorder. There's simply no other reason you could post such nonsense after all the discussion on this matter to date.

No, dumbfuck, it means Trump can't solicit foreign aid to investigate any of the candidates for president. It doesn't mean they're off limits otherwise.

Savvy?

POTUS has a duty to investigate corruption regardless of who they are,,,its not his fault joe was running for office,,

Not if he has to break the law to do so. The president is not above, or below, the law.

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

 

[jc456]

Good Luck.
Shokin is corrupt. So yeah, let's believe Shokin. Lol.

Well hell, you are stupid but no one believes you anyway!

And you are nothing but a bootlicking turd.

Add another subversive American HATER....LOLOL

Get a life you fucking loser.

when you know you got em.

 

[busybee01]

Your childish aside, it was already taken seriously and the aid was only authorized after our military reported that Ukraine had taken significant steps to address corruption. All this was, of course a available to the president. Were he truly concerned about corruption.

So you think the President should just rubber stamp everything that comes to his desk? Isn't that kind of the job of a President; to oversee the agencies underneath him?

That is just stupid. The President of the United States can not possibly deal, personally, with every single thing that comes across his desk - millions of bits of information. He relies on an array of advisors, specialists, cabinet heads and agency heads to provide him with the best information possible on important topics that NEED his direct attention, otherwise it is taken care of by those heads. He does NOT send his personal lawyer in to try to force a foreign head of state to open an investigation on his political rival.

Come on!

So who's his political rival? Did the Democrats have their nomination vote already?

Biden is running for President as is Trump so he is a political rival.

No, Biden is running against his fellow commies. It's who wins the nomination that will face Trump. Therefore, Biden is not his rival.

Biden is one of the candidates for President. He is a rival.

 

[busybee01]

Your childish aside, it was already taken seriously and the aid was only authorized after our military reported that Ukraine had taken significant steps to address corruption. All this was, of course a available to the president. Were he truly concerned about corruption.

So you think the President should just rubber stamp everything that comes to his desk? Isn't that kind of the job of a President; to oversee the agencies underneath him?

That is just stupid. The President of the United States can not possibly deal, personally, with every single thing that comes across his desk - millions of bits of information. He relies on an array of advisors, specialists, cabinet heads and agency heads to provide him with the best information possible on important topics that NEED his direct attention, otherwise it is taken care of by those heads. He does NOT send his personal lawyer in to try to force a foreign head of state to open an investigation on his political rival.

Come on!

So who's his political rival? Did the Democrats have their nomination vote already?

Biden is running for President as is Trump so he is a political rival.

no they're not, Biden is rival with Pocahontas and the other demofk clowns. Right?

Let me ask you, when the ballots come out, will biden be on the same side as trump?

Biden has filed to run for President just as Trump has. They are rivals as are the other Democrats.

 

[busybee01]

Shokin says different. How do you explain that?

Shokin was NOT investigating corruption, turning a blind eye to corruption, and Biden was asked (by European Nations) to pressure Ukrainian officials to fire Shokin. Trump defends Shokin, go figure,

Shokin was investigating corruption according to him. When he started to dig into Hunter's money laundering, Joe got pissed and had him fired. Why would Shokin say these things if it were not true? There is nothing in it for him.

We work for our own interests, not other nations when it comes to diplomacy. If they wanted to have the guy fired, why didn't they do it? And that aside, why did Joe only give them six hours to get it done?

Shokin was not investigating corruption and even Ukrainians know that. What is in it for him? Revenge. Biden broke up his gravy train. The Obama Administration had a duty to ensure that taxpayer dollars were not lost to corruption. The head of the IMF also expressed doubts about sending aid to Ukraine because of Shokin. There were also large demonstrations by Ukrainians against Shokin's corruption.

Well sure. If I were Shokin and lost my job because I was investigating the business his son was getting paid off for, I would want revenge as well; especially when the media keeps printing there was no investigation going on at the time.

You are going to need a lot more than that. Shokin is a crook. He was not even investigating Burisma.

If he was a crook, why was he not arrested and jailed, ESPECIALLY SINCE...

BREAKING! TRUMP WAS RIGHT!... Head of Burisma Holdings Indicted in Ukraine ...
Nov 20, 2019 · The claim alleges that Hunter Biden and his partners received $16.5 million for their ' services'. Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden

The Gateway Pundit. Enough said.

Instead of complaining, why not show some proof that their story is a lie....now remember, Any left wing articles are now automatically suspect ...you brought it up!

They are not investigating Hunter Biden. There is no evidence he did anything wrong.

Of course there is no evidence he did anything wrong. Shokin was trying to get the evidence according to him. How can you say there was no evidence if there was no investigation?

Even Ukrainians knew he was corrupt.

Ukrainian Protesters Demand Dismissal Of Prosecutor-General

Daria Kaleniuk‏ @dkaleniuk
Replying to @OliverBullough
Thank you @OliverBullough - indeed it’s insane to use UKRAINE as a ball at the AMERICAN national political field. Prosecutor Shokin did not open the case on Zlochevskyi & Burisma. He dumped it. And he was fired for being corrupt and failing prosecution reform @kenvogel

12:52 PM - 2 May 2019

 

[busybee01]

"Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters."

You have a mental disorder. There's simply no other reason you could post such nonsense after all the discussion on this matter to date.

No, dumbfuck, it means Trump can't solicit foreign aid to investigate any of the candidates for president. It doesn't mean they're off limits otherwise.

Savvy?

POTUS has a duty to investigate corruption regardless of who they are,,,its not his fault joe was running for office,,

Not if he has to break the law to do so. The president is not above, or below, the law.

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

There has to be probable cause. The DOJ cannot open a investigation with no evidence.

 

[busybee01]

LOLOL

Why would I believe an op/ed writer quoting a fired corrupt prosecutor who only recently began saying he was actively investigating it??

what corruption was he convicted of??

Why are you asking me? When did I ever say he was convicted?

so he wasnt corrupt,,,

He was accused of corruption. Are you saying one has to be convicted of corruption to be corrupt?

Yes.

To be legally punished for corruption, you have to undergo due process. The fact that Sleepy Joe or some other liberal busybodies "said" he was corrupt is no reason to remove him from office

Yes it is. The US, the world community and Ukrainians all knew he was corrupt. Ukrainians supported Biden in this.

 

[progressive hunter]

POTUS has a duty to investigate corruption regardless of who they are,,,its not his fault joe was running for office,,

Not if he has to break the law to do so. The president is not above, or below, the law.

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

There has to be probable cause. The DOJ cannot open a investigation with no evidence.

is it probable cause or evidence???

 

[Polishprince]

what corruption was he convicted of??

Why are you asking me? When did I ever say he was convicted?

so he wasnt corrupt,,,

He was accused of corruption. Are you saying one has to be convicted of corruption to be corrupt?

Yes.

To be legally punished for corruption, you have to undergo due process. The fact that Sleepy Joe or some other liberal busybodies "said" he was corrupt is no reason to remove him from office

Yes it is. The US, the world community and Ukrainians all knew he was corrupt. Ukrainians supported Biden in this.

Mr. Shokin was never charged or imprisoned after Biden forced him out.

The "corruption" that Shokin was involved with was investigating Hunter Biden

 

[busybee01]

That is just stupid. The President of the United States can not possibly deal, personally, with every single thing that comes across his desk - millions of bits of information. He relies on an array of advisors, specialists, cabinet heads and agency heads to provide him with the best information possible on important topics that NEED his direct attention, otherwise it is taken care of by those heads. He does NOT send his personal lawyer in to try to force a foreign head of state to open an investigation on his political rival.

Come on!

So who's his political rival? Did the Democrats have their nomination vote already?

Biden is running for President as is Trump so he is a political rival.

No, Biden is running against his fellow commies. It's who wins the nomination that will face Trump. Therefore, Biden is not his rival.

Bull. Biden is regarded as the strongest candidate and most likely to beat Trump. That makes him a rival. These word ga.es are just pathetic attempts excuse his behavior.

Hmmm out of ALL the corruption in Ukraine he just happens to ask them to announce an investigation on Biden.

It doesn't matter if Biden was (in July) the strongest anything. It was months away from the vote of the people. He was not Trump's rival, and may not be by the time of the primary election. Saying he would be and basing an impeachment on this fortune telling is what's one would call a phony excuse.

The first Thought Police impeachment in our history.

He is a rival to Trump and clearly the rival he fears the most. Mick Mulvaney has admitted to it so it is not a thought crime. Giuliani's attempts to pressure Ukraine is not a thought crime.

 

[busybee01]

Bull. Biden is regarded as the strongest candidate and most likely to beat Trump. That makes him a rival. These word ga.es are just pathetic attempts excuse his behavior.

Hmmm out of ALL the corruption in Ukraine he just happens to ask them to announce an investigation on Biden.

It doesn't matter if Biden was (in July) the strongest anything. It was months away from the vote of the people. He was not Trump's rival, and may not be by the time of the primary election. Saying he would be and basing an impeachment on this fortune telling is what's one would call a phony excuse.

The first Thought Police impeachment in our history.

He does not have to be on the ticket yet to be a rival, political ads start up long before primaries. Again, it is a pathetic excuse for bad behavior.

Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters. Assuming Biden is going to be the nominee is not solid grounds to impeach a President on. And what will you say if they impeach Trump, and Sanders or Warren gets the nomination?

It's real simple: Biden is Trump's rival or he is not. If he is, for Democrats to make the case, cancel all future debates, and nominate him without the vote of their constituents. After all, they know it's going to be Biden anyway, so the voters won't get upset.

"Then that means every single runner for the nomination is off limits for the Republicans to look into extremely suspicious matters."

You have a mental disorder. There's simply no other reason you could post such nonsense after all the discussion on this matter to date.

No, dumbfuck, it means Trump can't solicit foreign aid to investigate any of the candidates for president. It doesn't mean they're off limits otherwise.

Savvy?

POTUS has a duty to investigate corruption regardless of who they are,,,its not his fault joe was running for office,,

That is what the DOJ does. They do not open investigations just because a President wants it.

 

[busybee01]

Not if he has to break the law to do so. The president is not above, or below, the law.

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

There has to be probable cause. The DOJ cannot open a investigation with no evidence.

is it probable cause or evidence???

They are one and the same you moron.

 

[progressive hunter]

the law and his oath says it his duty to weed out corruption

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

There has to be probable cause. The DOJ cannot open a investigation with no evidence.

is it probable cause or evidence???

They are one and the same you moron.

no they are not,,and this proves youre an ignorant moron,,,

 

[busybee01]

Why are you asking me? When did I ever say he was convicted?

so he wasnt corrupt,,,

He was accused of corruption. Are you saying one has to be convicted of corruption to be corrupt?

Yes.

To be legally punished for corruption, you have to undergo due process. The fact that Sleepy Joe or some other liberal busybodies "said" he was corrupt is no reason to remove him from office

Yes it is. The US, the world community and Ukrainians all knew he was corrupt. Ukrainians supported Biden in this.

Mr. Shokin was never charged or imprisoned after Biden forced him out.

The "corruption" that Shokin was involved with was investigating Hunter Biden

Untrue. There never was a investigation of Hunter Biden and the investigation into Burisma was ended when Biden made his demand.

 

[busybee01]

His oath is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He can't do that if he's violating the law

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

There has to be probable cause. The DOJ cannot open a investigation with no evidence.

is it probable cause or evidence???

They are one and the same you moron.

no they are not,,and this proves youre an ignorant moron,,,

Yes they are. You are the ignorant moron.

 

[progressive hunter]

so any criminal can avoid prosecution just by declaring their candidacy???

There has to be probable cause. The DOJ cannot open a investigation with no evidence.

is it probable cause or evidence???

They are one and the same you moron.

no they are not,,and this proves youre an ignorant moron,,,

Yes they are. You are the ignorant moron.

no they arent or they would be called the same thing,,moron,,,

 

[Polishprince]

So who's his political rival? Did the Democrats have their nomination vote already?

Biden is running for President as is Trump so he is a political rival.

No, Biden is running against his fellow commies. It's who wins the nomination that will face Trump. Therefore, Biden is not his rival.

Bull. Biden is regarded as the strongest candidate and most likely to beat Trump. That makes him a rival. These word ga.es are just pathetic attempts excuse his behavior.

Hmmm out of ALL the corruption in Ukraine he just happens to ask them to announce an investigation on Biden.

It doesn't matter if Biden was (in July) the strongest anything. It was months away from the vote of the people. He was not Trump's rival, and may not be by the time of the primary election. Saying he would be and basing an impeachment on this fortune telling is what's one would call a phony excuse.

The first Thought Police impeachment in our history.

He is a rival to Trump and clearly the rival he fears the most. Mick Mulvaney has admitted to it so it is not a thought crime. Giuliani's attempts to pressure Ukraine is not a thought crime.

I would disagree on that.

President Trump has been very open. He is anxious to face Sleepy Joe in 2020, in fact he's already given him his pet name. Biden is obviously mentally deficient and Mr. Trump enjoys competing with defectives. It would be in President Trump's stated best interest to not stand in the way of Biden.

Further, libs don't care about Bite Me's corruption, or the corruption of any lib.