Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh look ....another personal attack. Lol
So you say....with no evidence. LolOh look another dodging of this: "CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time."
You will eventually get exposed as the troll you are well known to be elsewhere since you are not here to really discuss anything of substance.
Actually, according to the narrative, and international politics? Scientifically, you are correct. . . Politically Vegasgiants is correct. This is an epic job of gas-lighting, the establishment wants to conflate science with politics.No it isn't. You analyze the water, provided there are no poisons, or toxic materials it is safe.
No consensus. It is yes/no.
www.newfoodmagazine.com
So you say....with no evidence. Lol
Let's discuss itYou know the truth since you have been banned from several forums but I can't post the forum names here for the obvious reasons.
Meanwhile you still avoid discussing the science stuff, third time I post this,
"CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time."
What a stupid reply since you make clear you going to ignore post one article because as many have learned you are mainly here for trolling.
Actually, according to the narrative, and international politics? Scientifically, you are correct. . . Politically Vegasgiants is correct. This is an epic job of gas-lighting, the establishment wants to conflate science with politics.
Folks need to understand how Codex Alimentarius work, to understand the thinking of bureaucrats behind the AGW scam. They aren't for sure if humans cause it, so, they take the data, and attribute it to humans just in case. The use arbitrary standards, based on political agendas, and then use math, data, and formulas. . . and pass THAT off as, "science," within their models.
NCF Dr Rima Laibow Codex Alimentarius and the Nazi Agenda 21 depoulation plan
Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day
1 Codex Standard 108-1981
Adopted 1981. Amendment 2001, 2011. Revisions 1997, 2008.
CODEX STANDARD FOR NATURAL MINERAL WATERS
". . . Regulations established by public health authorities have long been considered a barrier to greater implementation of water reuse in the food industry. However, in recent years, regulators’ perceptions have started to change. The Committee on Food Hygiene of the Codex Alimentarius Commission has published draft guidelines on the hygienic reuse of processing water in food plants. These acknowledge that ‘while water should be reconditioned to a level safe and suitable for its intended use, reconditioning to the level of potable water is unnecessary in many cases’. However, regarding reuse water for incorporation into a food product, it insists on meeting at least the microbiological and, where necessary, chemical specifications for potable water4."Water reuse and recycling in the food industry
Water is an essential resource for food and drink production. With water scarcity worldwide a serious concern, there is a need for industry to address the impact of its water consumption and consider ways in which it can optimise water use in the future whilst ensuring the safety and...
Memes!!!!!!!!! Lol
Let's discuss it
I see no evidence of that claim
Ok no evidenceYou have seen it many times therefore either your brain is full of Swiss cheese, or you are playing games as you normally do.
I made the statement you didn't address it because you know you can't which is why you throw it back.
When I post the evidence that isn't even under dispute by scientists on your side since the is 101 stuff that has been understood for years.
AGW comes in two parts, and YOU have no idea what it is because you ignore the answer over and over.
What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?
Let me know when you post something of value.
Ok no evidence
Dismissed
Post your evidenceLOL I gave you something to start with but your inability to understand it is made obvious:
"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"
I wonder if you even have a clue what this is.
Post your evidence
You still don't know what it means, and it is one of the answers about the Logarithmic of CO2 warm forcing.
Your ignorance is screaming loud!
THINK little child.....
"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"
This is 101 stuff and you don't even recognize it!
Memes!!!!!!!!A meme that accurately depicts how you warmer cultists have perverted science, sock-o.
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?
The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.climate.nasa.gov
You dont know?Here is his typical dodge to a website with no detail offered.
It is clear you don't understand this:
"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"
You dont know?
HAHAHAHAHA
