Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
So you also believe that a higher weight should be placed on consistency of care rather than quality of care?The ranking comes from the World Health Organization, the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. I believe their ranking system covers the pertinent points and should be considered accurate.
Actually, I should have put it another way. Instead of saying "I believe their ranking system covers the pertinent points and should be considered accurate", I should have said that the rankings come from well a established entity and should be considered and reviewed. I'm inclined to believe that an organization such as the United Nations would look at each nation under the same microscope and draw a fair conclusion. I'll admit, I haven't read the report. One has to wonder, France is no third world country. Just what is it that they have that we don't?
Socialism, that's what they have that we don't. Had you bothered to read any of the gazillion threads in which we ALREADY dissected this stupid-shit, biased, agenda-driven report from 10 freaking years ago - or bothered to read the report itself, for that matter - you would know that one of their primary considerations for how spiffy a healthcare system was (even more important than how good the doctors and hospitals were, how healthy the people were, etc.) was how socialized it was. Yeah, no bias THERE.
You could probably be more gullible, but I think it would require special surgery.