Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is referring to the idea that Weisselberg did cooperate with feds and actually received some limited immunity for it.He was subpoenaed, was he not?The CFO appeared as back as 2018.You actually think they’ve been cooperating with Vance? Seriously?well yeah...of course...but we didn't have that here....Vance in an unprecedented move indicted him for a crime...never before has that happened for this sort of thing.Maybe in a normal proceedings the accountants would have sat down with auditors.that’s certainly an argument his accountants would make with the govt auditors in a normal proceeding…but this of course is a witch hunt and unprecedented move…so certainly one his attorneys will be using at trial…and rhe Govt burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt it wasn’tAre you sure? Some of the Trump faithful here have been trying to say that Weisselberg’s apartment in Manhattan was necessary temporary housing. You know, temporary as in 15 years.nobody is alternating reality about the trumped up case against Weisseberg
Others have been pretending like the case is just car payments.
Others are pretending that tax fraud isn’t criminal.
certainly seems reasonable the business would want him to have an apartment in town closer to the office to use so he could be readily available instead of communiting all the time from his home in the suburbs
Trump’s organization refused to allow that to happen.
If he wanted to play hardball, he’ll get hardball. Just don’t complain when the prosecutors don’t cut you any slack.
And he's been cooperating with Vance and the Grand Jury since 2018.
The "hardball" is because Vance didn't hear what he wanted to hear.
They have where they felt they had to, and fought on issues where they thought he was going to far. Which is there right, and on some issues they apparently were, like trumps personal tax returns, which they have and found zippy to charge him with and his CFO wouldn’t say what they wanted so they took this unprecedented move
Kinda hard to claim you’re cooperating when all you did was comply with a minimum legal obligation.
They did not cooperate. They took Vance to the Supreme Court to get the tax returns for the organization. They refused to let anyone sit down voluntarily. They refused to turn over any information unless compelled.
They didn’t cooperate. Saying otherwise is defying reality.
He was indicted for being a friend of Trump's.I’m sorry, is he indicted for being a friend to Trump or indicted for evading hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes?It portrays some DA douches attempt at criminalizing being a friend of Trump.
Checks the indictment.
Turns out it’s the second one.
1353Post a link.yep.No they didn’t.they said he doesn't need to go to jail. you should actually read.
There’s nothing in that post that has anything to do with what you claimed. Quote the text.1353Post a link.yep.No they didn’t.they said he doesn't need to go to jail. you should actually read.
Given the events of the last 5 years, that seems like a very safe bet for securing a felony conviction.He was indicted for being a friend of Trump's.
Nope. Tax fraud. Don’t worry, people actually know what tax fraud is will handle it. You can go back to playing with your blocks.He was indicted for being a friend of Trump's.
From federal prosecutors.He is referring to the idea that Weisselberg did cooperate with feds and actually received some limited immunity for it.
Get something through your thick skull Neanderthal. What you and your fellow leftards keep ignoring is that nobody has said not to prosecute except you idiots. We merely point out (as did your bible The NY Times) that this matter is handled in civil court with audits and fines. Not parading an elderly man around in handcuffs so you look tough while letting leftie Al Sharpton walk free with millions owed in taxes.You think tax fraud doesn’t impact people?If it’s a violent crime, it’s no longer a broken windows issue.poor kids breaking windows to get into people's shit is usually more important because the people getting broken into are usually just as poor. Plus the chance for violence is exponentially higher in these situations compared to white collar crime.
You’re rationalizing ignoring hundreds of thousands of dollars of fraud because of you want to focus on hundreds of dollars theft.
It’s pathetic the lengths you go through to protect the rich. We can’t prosecute them because their crime sent SMALL enough.
I'm saying let the DA's with the beancounters handle that shit, because some local idiot doesn't have the staff to present it to a jury without them being bored for 5 weeks of numbers.
What's pathetic is a Manhattan DA gunning for something that doesn't impact people on the streets while ignoring things on the street going to hell.
And the guy who breaks into your house when you aren't there easily becomes the guy who breaks in when you are there.
What’s this nonsense about “boring” a jury? Is that like a serious criticism? Somehow we can’t prosecute “boring” crimes. Jesus, you’re pathetic.
Another lie. You had no problem with Barry and holder ignoring subpoenas left and right. With actual claims of being above the law. Vance has nothing. Except another stain on his record. You calling anybody ignorant is just hilarious.His argument before the court was that as president he is above the law.He didn't claim he was above the law, everyday citizens right against subpeanas all the time. He was exercising his right to go to Court to redress an issue.
You shoulda read the briefs.
Best he got SO FAR was an executive who took home $1.7 million without paying taxes on any of it. Reducing it to a car shows either ignorance or dishonesty.
And you can bet he is being offered a degree of immunity for himself and for his family by the Manhattan DA. There are bigger fish here.From federal prosecutors.He is referring to the idea that Weisselberg did cooperate with feds and actually received some limited immunity for it.
COmpared to your utter embarrassment of trying multiple times and failing to get Trump on anything you must be in intensive care from all the premature elation.Nixon was always complaining about people out to get him too and as we all know he was so innocent.No other administration had to deal with the level of hate shown to his.
Your back must hurt from carrying Trump’s water.
Tons of people are saying don’t prosecute.What you and your fellow leftards keep ignoring is that nobody has said not to prosecute except you idiots.
LInk to where Trump oversaw every transaction at every company he was involved with. We’ll wait until the 12th of never for that proof.So your excuse is that Trump didn't know his own company was committing felonies. So you are going with "he is an oblivious moron with poor leadership ability and is a poor judge of character". Okay.Still gotta get the name Trump in there even if he had no idea what was going on
they could have fought it, like other subpoenas…like others have doneBecause that’s not cooperating. You are legally required to show up when summoned by a grand jury.what does that have to do with my post that the CFO has been cooperating and meeting with the GJ since 2018?
Remember the calls of "lock her up" during Trump rallies?COmpared to your utter embarrassment of trying multiple times and failing to get Trump on anything you must be in intensive care from all the premature elation.
So cite all these people. Pointing out legal precedent and procedure makes you sad because it shows you a liar and it doesn’t get Trump.Tons of people are saying don’t prosecute.What you and your fellow leftards keep ignoring is that nobody has said not to prosecute except you idiots.
This is a crime. Crimes should be prosecuted. Tax frauds are prosecuted all the time.
They could have sat down with investigators without getting a subpoena from a grand jury.they could have fought it, like other subpoenas…like others have done
Start a thread on Hillary if you need to deflect that badly. This is about tax crimes.Remember the calls of "lock her up" during Trump rallies?COmpared to your utter embarrassment of trying multiple times and failing to get Trump on anything you must be in intensive care from all the premature elation.
This bonehead says don't prosecute criminally.So cite all these people. Pointing out legal precedent and procedure makes you sad because it shows you a liar and it doesn’t get Trump.
Just "pay a fine". Tax fraud is a crime. It should be prosecuted criminally. Fines are meaningless to these assholes.We merely point out (as did your bible The NY Times) that this matter is handled in civil court with audits and fines.
They fully cooperated when they felt it was justified and fought on issues they didn’t believe was.He was subpoenaed, was he not?The CFO appeared as back as 2018.You actually think they’ve been cooperating with Vance? Seriously?well yeah...of course...but we didn't have that here....Vance in an unprecedented move indicted him for a crime...never before has that happened for this sort of thing.Maybe in a normal proceedings the accountants would have sat down with auditors.that’s certainly an argument his accountants would make with the govt auditors in a normal proceeding…but this of course is a witch hunt and unprecedented move…so certainly one his attorneys will be using at trial…and rhe Govt burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt it wasn’tAre you sure? Some of the Trump faithful here have been trying to say that Weisselberg’s apartment in Manhattan was necessary temporary housing. You know, temporary as in 15 years.nobody is alternating reality about the trumped up case against Weisseberg
Others have been pretending like the case is just car payments.
Others are pretending that tax fraud isn’t criminal.
certainly seems reasonable the business would want him to have an apartment in town closer to the office to use so he could be readily available instead of communiting all the time from his home in the suburbs
Trump’s organization refused to allow that to happen.
If he wanted to play hardball, he’ll get hardball. Just don’t complain when the prosecutors don’t cut you any slack.
And he's been cooperating with Vance and the Grand Jury since 2018.
The "hardball" is because Vance didn't hear what he wanted to hear.
They have where they felt they had to, and fought on issues where they thought he was going to far. Which is there right, and on some issues they apparently were, like trumps personal tax returns, which they have and found zippy to charge him with and his CFO wouldn’t say what they wanted so they took this unprecedented move
Kinda hard to claim you’re cooperating when all you did was comply with a minimum legal obligation.
They did not cooperate. They took Vance to the Supreme Court to get the tax returns for the organization. They refused to let anyone sit down voluntarily. They refused to turn over any information unless compelled.
They didn’t cooperate. Saying otherwise is defying reality.
