DBA
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2015
- 13,067
- 11,808
- 2,140
I never said it did ban them. I said it allowed them.
If Roe v Wade didn't ban late term abortions, how did overturning it increase access to late term abortions?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never said it did ban them. I said it allowed them.
If Roe v Wade didn't ban late term abortions, how did overturning it increase access to late term abortions?
Read the thread. Already explained.
I give up. Your explanation make no sense to me. Bottom line is that states had the same right to rule on late term abortions when Roe v Wade was in effect just as they do now.
Limiting the authority of the state is a victory for individual liberty.In other words they just made it up, their state constitution does not cover abortion. They are just repeating what old corrupt immoral SCOTUS used to do. If the current SCOTUS has any balls, they will overrule this, making it clear that states will need to pass clear amendments to their constitution if they want to allow abortion, instead of vague interpretations of them.
The voters of the state made their wishes apparent, but leftwing radicals hate following the will of the people.
![]()
US Supreme Court approves ban on “partial birth abortion”
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
4 of the 6 justices on the Kansas SC are Democrats. What you are saying is that Democrats with power with do evil things. I agree and the same thing will happen if Democrats gain control of the US SC.
It’s “authoritarian” to prevent the murder of innocent life?Limiting the authority of the state is a victory for individual liberty.
Defeating the authoritarian right’s efforts to increase the power of the state is likewise a victory for individual liberty.