Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 96,233
- 71,680
He literally already stated he doesn't have to cooperate. Stop being a moron and a pest.Link us up to where he is required to cooperate with Vance?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He literally already stated he doesn't have to cooperate. Stop being a moron and a pest.Link us up to where he is required to cooperate with Vance?
Already granted and explicitly stated by him. You guys are like children.again, they are not obligated.
that's temporary. hahahhhahahahahaha, fk, can't make it up, they contradict each other so much in here it becomes hilarious.And just as important, he was there for >50% of each tax year, yet did not claim it as his primary residence.
why does he keep saying they didn't cooperate then? I've asked the troller, but he hasn't answered, since you're covering him, why?He literally already stated he doesn't have to cooperate. Stop being a moron and a pest.Link us up to where he is required to cooperate with Vance?
False. It is a simple rule: 183 days or more spent residing there. But you didn't know that, because, as is the case with every topic, you know less than nothing about any of this.that's temporary.
Correct, your post had nothing to do with the topic.You realize that has nothing to do with the topic, right?Barry ignored subpoenas from Congress, douchebag. You had no problem with that.
This isn't a thread about Congressional oversight of the executive.
After so much experience, one would think you would be a more clever troll. I guess some bars just can't be cleared, for some people.Correct, your post had nothing to do with the topic.You realize that has nothing to do with the topic, right?Barry ignored subpoenas from Congress, douchebag. You had no problem with that.
This isn't a thread about Congressional oversight of the executive.
no it’s plain English. They fully cooperated on everything, but on the issues that they believed Vance was going to far and fought those issues. Not sure how clearer that can be.So they "fully cooperated" except when they didn't.They fully cooperated when they felt it was justified and fought on issues they didn’t believe was.He was subpoenaed, was he not?The CFO appeared as back as 2018.You actually think they’ve been cooperating with Vance? Seriously?well yeah...of course...but we didn't have that here....Vance in an unprecedented move indicted him for a crime...never before has that happened for this sort of thing.Maybe in a normal proceedings the accountants would have sat down with auditors.that’s certainly an argument his accountants would make with the govt auditors in a normal proceeding…but this of course is a witch hunt and unprecedented move…so certainly one his attorneys will be using at trial…and rhe Govt burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt it wasn’tAre you sure? Some of the Trump faithful here have been trying to say that Weisselberg’s apartment in Manhattan was necessary temporary housing. You know, temporary as in 15 years.nobody is alternating reality about the trumped up case against Weisseberg
Others have been pretending like the case is just car payments.
Others are pretending that tax fraud isn’t criminal.
certainly seems reasonable the business would want him to have an apartment in town closer to the office to use so he could be readily available instead of communiting all the time from his home in the suburbs
Trump’s organization refused to allow that to happen.
If he wanted to play hardball, he’ll get hardball. Just don’t complain when the prosecutors don’t cut you any slack.
And he's been cooperating with Vance and the Grand Jury since 2018.
The "hardball" is because Vance didn't hear what he wanted to hear.
They have where they felt they had to, and fought on issues where they thought he was going to far. Which is there right, and on some issues they apparently were, like trumps personal tax returns, which they have and found zippy to charge him with and his CFO wouldn’t say what they wanted so they took this unprecedented move
Kinda hard to claim you’re cooperating when all you did was comply with a minimum legal obligation.
They did not cooperate. They took Vance to the Supreme Court to get the tax returns for the organization. They refused to let anyone sit down voluntarily. They refused to turn over any information unless compelled.
They didn’t cooperate. Saying otherwise is defying reality.
The CFO has been meeting with Vance and the GJ since 2018 and the propagandist were running headlines then saying he was flipping and trump was doomed. Then earlier this year the stories were recycled…and now, after he has the “missing piece” trump tax returns and the CFO isn’t saying what Vance wants…we have these unprecedented charges and nothing on Trump.
Face it, you were had
You know that's doublespeak right?
The headlines you're thinking of are Weisselberg meeting with federal prosecutors with regard to Cohen.
This was his permanent job, you doofus. You don't get tax free housing for your permanent job just to cut down on commute.it is if he used it temporarily. Maybe others used it as well. Again, the english language and you don't get along.
I love this line.no it’s plain English. They fully cooperated on everything, but on the issues that they believed Vance was going to far and fought those issues. Not sure how clearer that can be.
You really are terrible at understanding the point being made here. Just, really not very smart.again, they are not obligated.
You're an idiot. I didn't bring up Congressional subpoenas.Correct, your post had nothing to do with the topic.
It makes a lot of sense, if you don't think about it.Trump was fully faithful to his wife, except when he believed he really wanted to have sex with someone else.
Because it's true and relevant.why does he keep saying they didn't cooperate then?
haha maybe in your business. but a company having an apartment in the city for employees is not uncommonThis was his permanent job, you doofus. You don't get tax free housing for your permanent job just to cut down on commute.it is if he used it temporarily. Maybe others used it as well. Again, the english language and you don't get along.
That's fine.haha maybe in your business. but a company having an apartment in the city for employees is not uncommon
that’s not doublespeak, in your hypo is was until he wasn’t.I love this line.no it’s plain English. They fully cooperated on everything, but on the issues that they believed Vance was going to far and fought those issues. Not sure how clearer that can be.
Trump was fully faithful to his wife, except when he believed he really wanted to have sex with someone else.
With this kind of doublespeak, anything is possible.
again not necessarily but it could, and as i said normally the experts would argue of it and if something was owed paidThat's fine.haha maybe in your business. but a company having an apartment in the city for employees is not uncommon
But it becomes a taxable benefit then.
Yes. It’s doublespeak. Fully cooperating means fully. If you go to the Supreme Court to block a subpoena, that’s not fully cooperating.that’s not doublespeak, in your hypo is was until he wasn’t.I love this line.no it’s plain English. They fully cooperated on everything, but on the issues that they believed Vance was going to far and fought those issues. Not sure how clearer that can be.
Trump was fully faithful to his wife, except when he believed he really wanted to have sex with someone else.
With this kind of doublespeak, anything is possible.
but that’s not the same comparison either. the question is of really three different things/people , the CFO, Trump and the Trump Org. and numerous issues
Trump personally didn’t cooperate with turning his personal private federal tax returns over
the CFO cooperated fully and has since 2018.
The trump org fully cooperated but on specific issues when they thought the Vance was going to far in his obvious witch hunt and exercised their rights on those issues
with that said nobody is required to cooperate. Vance was given a gift when the CFO did as far back as 2018
Yes. Necessarily. The rules on tax free lodging are pretty strict.again not necessarily but it could, and as i said normally the experts would argue of it and if something was owed paidThat's fine.haha maybe in your business. but a company having an apartment in the city for employees is not uncommon
But it becomes a taxable benefit then.
not this unprecedented move by Vance because he ended up with nothing during his witch hunt against the President