ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 6,111
- 5,954
- 1,940
Treason has been normalized by Democrats.
Biden boasted in front of television cameras of bribing Ukraine to stop investigating his criminal son, Hunter, or he would withhold their billions in foreign aid. It worked. Biden bragged about his criminality, not that one Democrat in America had the decency, the integrity, to care.
Then there was the conspiracy by 50 high ranking FBI and other officials to discredit Biden and son's criminal acts documented on the drug addict's laptop computer. Did one Democrat in America give a rip?
If so, who? Please document your feeble response.
This from the Wall Street Journal:
--------------------------------------
Wall Street Journal March 22, 2022 by Gerard Baker
In that famous letter (discrediting the validity of Hunter Biden’s laptop), more than 50 former national-security and intelligence officials polished their gleaming credentials and alleged that the New York Post was guilty of peddling a story that had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” The principal rationale for this, the letter laid out, was that the story might be helpful to Donald Trump. Russia wanted Mr. Trump to win. The story helped Mr. Trump. Ergo, it was the work of Russia.
That’s quite a syllogism. Using that same logic, you might conclude that Russia was also responsible for any unexpectedly good economic data that helped the incumbent, or that Vladimir Putin was behind the crime wave that had gripped Democrat- run cities.
Now we can guess why so much U.S. intelligence has been so faulty all these years. Either these 50 or so grandmasters of international espionage are completely unable to distinguish Russian disinformation from real information, or they prostituted their credentials in a naked act of political hackery. I don’t have their experience or deductive skills, but I’m ready to go with the latter.
The deeper shame here is the lack of accountability across American institutions. No one who colluded in this conspiracy against truth has even been inconvenienced by it.
Contacted by the Post last week, not one of the letter’s signatories expressed regret or contrition. The reporters and editors at news organizations and the employees and executives of tech companies who participated in the suppression continue to be lionized for their work.
This is what is so corrosive of trust and, in the end, of the system itself. The one way in which real accountability is supposed to work in a democracy is at the ballot box. But how can that even work when the people we want to hold accountable decide what information the voters are allowed to see?
Biden boasted in front of television cameras of bribing Ukraine to stop investigating his criminal son, Hunter, or he would withhold their billions in foreign aid. It worked. Biden bragged about his criminality, not that one Democrat in America had the decency, the integrity, to care.
Then there was the conspiracy by 50 high ranking FBI and other officials to discredit Biden and son's criminal acts documented on the drug addict's laptop computer. Did one Democrat in America give a rip?
If so, who? Please document your feeble response.
This from the Wall Street Journal:
--------------------------------------
Wall Street Journal March 22, 2022 by Gerard Baker
In that famous letter (discrediting the validity of Hunter Biden’s laptop), more than 50 former national-security and intelligence officials polished their gleaming credentials and alleged that the New York Post was guilty of peddling a story that had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” The principal rationale for this, the letter laid out, was that the story might be helpful to Donald Trump. Russia wanted Mr. Trump to win. The story helped Mr. Trump. Ergo, it was the work of Russia.
That’s quite a syllogism. Using that same logic, you might conclude that Russia was also responsible for any unexpectedly good economic data that helped the incumbent, or that Vladimir Putin was behind the crime wave that had gripped Democrat- run cities.
Now we can guess why so much U.S. intelligence has been so faulty all these years. Either these 50 or so grandmasters of international espionage are completely unable to distinguish Russian disinformation from real information, or they prostituted their credentials in a naked act of political hackery. I don’t have their experience or deductive skills, but I’m ready to go with the latter.
The deeper shame here is the lack of accountability across American institutions. No one who colluded in this conspiracy against truth has even been inconvenienced by it.
Contacted by the Post last week, not one of the letter’s signatories expressed regret or contrition. The reporters and editors at news organizations and the employees and executives of tech companies who participated in the suppression continue to be lionized for their work.
This is what is so corrosive of trust and, in the end, of the system itself. The one way in which real accountability is supposed to work in a democracy is at the ballot box. But how can that even work when the people we want to hold accountable decide what information the voters are allowed to see?
