Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Senate Judiciary Chairman Confirms Trump Is Not Under FBI Investigation - Breitbartand at least 9 anonymous people say trump is guilty of something.so your NOT seeing hillaries crimes and seeing trumps is an example of how this should work to NOT be "contract blind"?The thing is that everyone involved in the Trump campaign had some ties to Russia and Trump himself had a beauty pageant there. You Trump lovers could see all kinds of guilty scenarios for Hillary Clinton when they weren't there, but here you now suddenly contract blindness.
There were no Hillary's crimes. At least 9 investigations showed this.
yet he's not under investigation now is he?
Trump is under investigation.
No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
Kudlow: It's Fake News to Claim Trump Is Under Investigation
Dunno.What Exactly are the High Crimes and Misdemeanors Trump Is Being Charged With?
yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.Senate Judiciary Chairman Confirms Trump Is Not Under FBI Investigation - Breitbartand at least 9 anonymous people say trump is guilty of something.so your NOT seeing hillaries crimes and seeing trumps is an example of how this should work to NOT be "contract blind"?
There were no Hillary's crimes. At least 9 investigations showed this.
yet he's not under investigation now is he?
Trump is under investigation.
No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
Kudlow: It's Fake News to Claim Trump Is Under Investigation
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.Senate Judiciary Chairman Confirms Trump Is Not Under FBI Investigation - Breitbartand at least 9 anonymous people say trump is guilty of something.There were no Hillary's crimes. At least 9 investigations showed this.
yet he's not under investigation now is he?
Trump is under investigation.
No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
Kudlow: It's Fake News to Claim Trump Is Under Investigation
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.Senate Judiciary Chairman Confirms Trump Is Not Under FBI Investigation - Breitbartand at least 9 anonymous people say trump is guilty of something.There were no Hillary's crimes. At least 9 investigations showed this.
yet he's not under investigation now is he?
Trump is under investigation.
No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
Kudlow: It's Fake News to Claim Trump Is Under Investigation
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.Senate Judiciary Chairman Confirms Trump Is Not Under FBI Investigation - Breitbartand at least 9 anonymous people say trump is guilty of something.
yet he's not under investigation now is he?
Trump is under investigation.
No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
Kudlow: It's Fake News to Claim Trump Is Under Investigation
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
Again with the delusional.....there was no crimeSo Rightwinger says the formation and make up of a senate and house committee, comprised up of both parties, is incapable to conduct an investigation.
To answer your cry for an investigation there isn't any evidence, like I clearly explained was evident with Clinton's emails. Evidence that prompted an investigation, there is not even anything to say a crime actually had been committed in this case ... NO PROMTING BASED ON EVIDENCE. You see this is where you liberals have fallen and hit your head, with Hillary she had leaked emails which tied directly to her at a timeline when she was Secretary of State that brought the need for an investigation. There isn't even any evidence that Trump and Russia collided to even effect an election. None.
Seriously, right winger, how many months where the democrats themselves reported any evidence - NONE that would suggest a collusion. If you were knowledgeable enough on the subject you could tell everyone here where the democrats missed on the "clear evidence" of collusion. Where is the clear smoking gun evidence that prompted the investigation?
There was a crime. DNC servers were hacked to influence a presidential election
The party that benefitted from the crime was in contact with the party that committed the crime while they released the information
Worthy of an investigation....agree?
What crime was committed?
According to Dershowitz there is none.What was the crime? Cite the specific statute that was violated.
"Political wrongdoing, but it's just not a crime," he said. "Nobody can point me to a statute that would be violated. And a prosecutor is only allowed to look for evidence of a federal crime."
Dershowitz Calls Special Counsel Mueller Good News For Trump: "He's Going To Find No Crime"
Hacking into someone else's computer is a crime
Even Dershowitz knows that
Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
Again with the delusional.....there was no crime
There was a crime. DNC servers were hacked to influence a presidential election
The party that benefitted from the crime was in contact with the party that committed the crime while they released the information
Worthy of an investigation....agree?
What crime was committed?
According to Dershowitz there is none.What was the crime? Cite the specific statute that was violated.
"Political wrongdoing, but it's just not a crime," he said. "Nobody can point me to a statute that would be violated. And a prosecutor is only allowed to look for evidence of a federal crime."
Dershowitz Calls Special Counsel Mueller Good News For Trump: "He's Going To Find No Crime"
Hacking into someone else's computer is a crime
Even Dershowitz knows that
Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
No different than Hillary meeting Loretta Lymch on a tarmac. Why was the head of the Attorney General of he United States and a woman under FBI investigation choosing that particular location to meet privately, as we would later find she has been cleared with a "no indictment" announcement by Comey? What exactly was being said at that meeting to her benefit?
You see speculation and assumptions with no evidence to prompt and support it, is simply that. It's not a crime, emails were released LONG before that meeting democrats are so sure had to be "illegal" as if no one traveled and met with a foreign diplomat. Now had he accepting large amounts of money from a foreign government to place into a personal ( 'ahem' ) foundation, that would be more suggestive of a "favor" than simply meeting face to face. Based on the democrats apparent standards, there appears to be more speculation, convenient benefit, as well as a trail of evidence to prompt curiousity and the need to investigate another candidate further with only the two stated examples I outlined above. As well as, there is as much evidence on Trump working with the Russians as apparently there is of Clinton giving uranium to them.
Care to try your luck again? Your argument doesn't appear to be doing so well.
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
Which part is "made up bullshit"?
The Russian hacking of DNC computers?
Trump benefitting from the release of information?
That members of Trumps campaign were meeting with the Russians at the time?
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.
the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
It was Bill Clinton who met with Lynch, but your points are just as valid.Again with the delusional.....there was no crime
There was a crime. DNC servers were hacked to influence a presidential election
The party that benefitted from the crime was in contact with the party that committed the crime while they released the information
Worthy of an investigation....agree?
What crime was committed?
According to Dershowitz there is none.What was the crime? Cite the specific statute that was violated.
"Political wrongdoing, but it's just not a crime," he said. "Nobody can point me to a statute that would be violated. And a prosecutor is only allowed to look for evidence of a federal crime."
Dershowitz Calls Special Counsel Mueller Good News For Trump: "He's Going To Find No Crime"
Hacking into someone else's computer is a crime
Even Dershowitz knows that
Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
No different than Hillary meeting Loretta Lymch on a tarmac. Why was the head of the Attorney General of he United States and a woman under FBI investigation choosing that particular location to meet privately, as we would later find she has been cleared with a "no indictment" announcement by Comey? What exactly was being said at that meeting to her benefit?
You see speculation and assumptions with no evidence to prompt and support it, is simply that. It's not a crime, emails were released LONG before that meeting democrats are so sure had to be "illegal" as if no one traveled and met with a foreign diplomat. Now had he accepting large amounts of money from a foreign government to place into a personal ( 'ahem' ) foundation, that would be more suggestive of a "favor" than simply meeting face to face. Based on the democrats apparent standards, there appears to be more speculation, convenient benefit, as well as a trail of evidence to prompt curiousity and the need to investigate another candidate further with only the two stated examples I outlined above. As well as, there is as much evidence on Trump working with the Russians as apparently there is of Clinton giving uranium to them.
Care to try your luck again? Your argument doesn't appear to be doing so well.
Perhaps Bill Clinton should be investigated for obstructing justice.It was Bill Clinton who met with Lynch, but your points are just as valid.What crime was committed?
According to Dershowitz there is none.What was the crime? Cite the specific statute that was violated.
"Political wrongdoing, but it's just not a crime," he said. "Nobody can point me to a statute that would be violated. And a prosecutor is only allowed to look for evidence of a federal crime."
Dershowitz Calls Special Counsel Mueller Good News For Trump: "He's Going To Find No Crime"
Hacking into someone else's computer is a crime
Even Dershowitz knows that
Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
No different than Hillary meeting Loretta Lymch on a tarmac. Why was the head of the Attorney General of he United States and a woman under FBI investigation choosing that particular location to meet privately, as we would later find she has been cleared with a "no indictment" announcement by Comey? What exactly was being said at that meeting to her benefit?
You see speculation and assumptions with no evidence to prompt and support it, is simply that. It's not a crime, emails were released LONG before that meeting democrats are so sure had to be "illegal" as if no one traveled and met with a foreign diplomat. Now had he accepting large amounts of money from a foreign government to place into a personal ( 'ahem' ) foundation, that would be more suggestive of a "favor" than simply meeting face to face. Based on the democrats apparent standards, there appears to be more speculation, convenient benefit, as well as a trail of evidence to prompt curiousity and the need to investigate another candidate further with only the two stated examples I outlined above. As well as, there is as much evidence on Trump working with the Russians as apparently there is of Clinton giving uranium to them.
Care to try your luck again? Your argument doesn't appear to be doing so well.
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
Which part is "made up bullshit"?
The Russian hacking of DNC computers?
Trump benefitting from the release of information?
That members of Trumps campaign were meeting with the Russians at the time?
show me a link that says for a fact russia did it. not saying they didn't, but the person the leaks came from has said time and again not the russians. since you don't seem to agree with assange, he's a liar i suppose and RUSSIA cause...well i don't know at this point but if you want to believe assange is a liar then what difference does it make? you're going to believe what you want.
benefiting - maybe. except what was the KILLER was more of comey coming back after finding a stockpile of hillarys mail on weiners laptop. (say that with a straight face, go ahead) what came off the DNC hacks that anyone really gave a damn about in the end?
meeting with russians at the time. is meeting illegal?
It was Bill Clinton who met with Lynch, but your points are just as valid.What crime was committed?
According to Dershowitz there is none.What was the crime? Cite the specific statute that was violated.
"Political wrongdoing, but it's just not a crime," he said. "Nobody can point me to a statute that would be violated. And a prosecutor is only allowed to look for evidence of a federal crime."
Dershowitz Calls Special Counsel Mueller Good News For Trump: "He's Going To Find No Crime"
Hacking into someone else's computer is a crime
Even Dershowitz knows that
Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
No different than Hillary meeting Loretta Lymch on a tarmac. Why was the head of the Attorney General of he United States and a woman under FBI investigation choosing that particular location to meet privately, as we would later find she has been cleared with a "no indictment" announcement by Comey? What exactly was being said at that meeting to her benefit?
You see speculation and assumptions with no evidence to prompt and support it, is simply that. It's not a crime, emails were released LONG before that meeting democrats are so sure had to be "illegal" as if no one traveled and met with a foreign diplomat. Now had he accepting large amounts of money from a foreign government to place into a personal ( 'ahem' ) foundation, that would be more suggestive of a "favor" than simply meeting face to face. Based on the democrats apparent standards, there appears to be more speculation, convenient benefit, as well as a trail of evidence to prompt curiousity and the need to investigate another candidate further with only the two stated examples I outlined above. As well as, there is as much evidence on Trump working with the Russians as apparently there is of Clinton giving uranium to them.
Care to try your luck again? Your argument doesn't appear to be doing so well.
Perhaps Bill Clinton should be investigated for obstructing justice.It was Bill Clinton who met with Lynch, but your points are just as valid.Hacking into someone else's computer is a crime
Even Dershowitz knows that
Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
No different than Hillary meeting Loretta Lymch on a tarmac. Why was the head of the Attorney General of he United States and a woman under FBI investigation choosing that particular location to meet privately, as we would later find she has been cleared with a "no indictment" announcement by Comey? What exactly was being said at that meeting to her benefit?
You see speculation and assumptions with no evidence to prompt and support it, is simply that. It's not a crime, emails were released LONG before that meeting democrats are so sure had to be "illegal" as if no one traveled and met with a foreign diplomat. Now had he accepting large amounts of money from a foreign government to place into a personal ( 'ahem' ) foundation, that would be more suggestive of a "favor" than simply meeting face to face. Based on the democrats apparent standards, there appears to be more speculation, convenient benefit, as well as a trail of evidence to prompt curiousity and the need to investigate another candidate further with only the two stated examples I outlined above. As well as, there is as much evidence on Trump working with the Russians as apparently there is of Clinton giving uranium to them.
Care to try your luck again? Your argument doesn't appear to be doing so well.
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.
Read more at: No, Trump Isn’t Under Criminal Investigation by the FBI
That looks like a criminal investigation to me
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
Which part is "made up bullshit"?
The Russian hacking of DNC computers?
Trump benefitting from the release of information?
That members of Trumps campaign were meeting with the Russians at the time?
show me a link that says for a fact russia did it. not saying they didn't, but the person the leaks came from has said time and again not the russians. since you don't seem to agree with assange, he's a liar i suppose and RUSSIA cause...well i don't know at this point but if you want to believe assange is a liar then what difference does it make? you're going to believe what you want.
benefiting - maybe. except what was the KILLER was more of comey coming back after finding a stockpile of hillarys mail on weiners laptop. (say that with a straight face, go ahead) what came off the DNC hacks that anyone really gave a damn about in the end?
meeting with russians at the time. is meeting illegal?
If you don't already understand, then no amount of explaining will help.Perhaps Bill Clinton should be investigated for obstructing justice.It was Bill Clinton who met with Lynch, but your points are just as valid.Which has nothing to do with president Trump or his campaign.
That is the question...
Trump was benefitting from the crime. Why were his people meeting with the Russians at the time information was being released?
If the meetings were routine....why can't Trump explain what they were talking about?
No different than Hillary meeting Loretta Lymch on a tarmac. Why was the head of the Attorney General of he United States and a woman under FBI investigation choosing that particular location to meet privately, as we would later find she has been cleared with a "no indictment" announcement by Comey? What exactly was being said at that meeting to her benefit?
You see speculation and assumptions with no evidence to prompt and support it, is simply that. It's not a crime, emails were released LONG before that meeting democrats are so sure had to be "illegal" as if no one traveled and met with a foreign diplomat. Now had he accepting large amounts of money from a foreign government to place into a personal ( 'ahem' ) foundation, that would be more suggestive of a "favor" than simply meeting face to face. Based on the democrats apparent standards, there appears to be more speculation, convenient benefit, as well as a trail of evidence to prompt curiousity and the need to investigate another candidate further with only the two stated examples I outlined above. As well as, there is as much evidence on Trump working with the Russians as apparently there is of Clinton giving uranium to them.
Care to try your luck again? Your argument doesn't appear to be doing so well.
How do you figure?
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
Which part is "made up bullshit"?
The Russian hacking of DNC computers?
Trump benefitting from the release of information?
That members of Trumps campaign were meeting with the Russians at the time?
show me a link that says for a fact russia did it. not saying they didn't, but the person the leaks came from has said time and again not the russians. since you don't seem to agree with assange, he's a liar i suppose and RUSSIA cause...well i don't know at this point but if you want to believe assange is a liar then what difference does it make? you're going to believe what you want.
benefiting - maybe. except what was the KILLER was more of comey coming back after finding a stockpile of hillarys mail on weiners laptop. (say that with a straight face, go ahead) what came off the DNC hacks that anyone really gave a damn about in the end?
meeting with russians at the time. is meeting illegal?
What does Assange know about where the leak originated from? No, Putin never called Assange and said...I have some leaks for you
They have intermediaries to do that. But the cyber trail leads to Russia. FBI says it, CIA says it. Obama admitted it, Trump admitted it and even Putin admits it.
Did Trump benefit from the leaks? Well, he benefitted in terms that he used the leaks on a weekly basis. He used the information to confirm his claims about "Crooked Hillary"....so yes, that is a benefit
Meeting with Russians is not illegal if you are discussing legal business. However, if you are discussing illegal activities or offering policy concessions in return for leaked information....that is illegal and that is what the FBI is investigating
well my main point is that while i think the investigations are made up bullshit by the left mad at losing, look if you must. i agree a ton was spent on hillary and hey - "turn about is fair play" is our mantra anymore. not being smart, not doing the RIGHT thing - but "payback"yep. people in his campaign seem to be under investigation but i don't see trump on that list.
I don't believe you would, as there were no meetings between Trump and the Russians
Much like any boss involved in criminal activity, they have others to do the dirty work and maintain plausible deniability. The question is....did they order the meetings or were they informed of what was going on
so if we need to wait for someone to come in and sort it all out, fine. no issues with that and let them look to verify which side is "right" so the other side can cry FOUL once more.
my only point is to tell people who keep lying and saying TRUMP HIMSELF is under investigation, are wrong.
Which part is "made up bullshit"?
The Russian hacking of DNC computers?
Trump benefitting from the release of information?
That members of Trumps campaign were meeting with the Russians at the time?
show me a link that says for a fact russia did it. not saying they didn't, but the person the leaks came from has said time and again not the russians. since you don't seem to agree with assange, he's a liar i suppose and RUSSIA cause...well i don't know at this point but if you want to believe assange is a liar then what difference does it make? you're going to believe what you want.
benefiting - maybe. except what was the KILLER was more of comey coming back after finding a stockpile of hillarys mail on weiners laptop. (say that with a straight face, go ahead) what came off the DNC hacks that anyone really gave a damn about in the end?
meeting with russians at the time. is meeting illegal?
What does Assange know about where the leak originated from? No, Putin never called Assange and said...I have some leaks for you
They have intermediaries to do that. But the cyber trail leads to Russia. FBI says it, CIA says it. Obama admitted it, Trump admitted it and even Putin admits it.
Did Trump benefit from the leaks? Well, he benefitted in terms that he used the leaks on a weekly basis. He used the information to confirm his claims about "Crooked Hillary"....so yes, that is a benefit
Meeting with Russians is not illegal if you are discussing legal business. However, if you are discussing illegal activities or offering policy concessions in return for leaked information....that is illegal and that is what the FBI is investigating
