What happens now that a Convicted Felon has won the presidency?

[Cellblock2429]

He won, the country lost.

Wait for it.

/——/ That’s just your buttsore TDS trying to come to grips with reality.

 

[the watcher]

 

[struth]

Ken Starr as special counsel to investigate Clinton was fine, but special counsel to investigate Trump is unconstitutional - according to the GOP and its appointed judicial hacks.

on the other subject of using business records fraud to commit another crime, it was a jury decision that still stands.

Ken Starr was appointed under the independent counsel law, the law that the dems allowed to sunset. Jack smith wasn’t appointed under that authority

 

[krichton]

MSN

He cannot pardon himself, because the charges are state charges. It is very, very unlikely that the NY Governor will pardon him. His sentencing could be delayed or reduced, but jail is still a possibility. In the trump way of doing things, he will delay, appeal, and deny...hoping that the charges disappear. And they certainly may, but MAGA must be proud of their Felon in Chief.

After 4 years in office destroying the country, we're going to find out it's either probation or a fine or both, some nonsense like that. And yes, it's a convicted felon now and Maga is damn proud of they have a criminal in the oval office, because it's their criminal.

 

[dudmuck]

Ken Starr was appointed under the independent counsel law, the law that the dems allowed to sunset. Jack smith wasn’t appointed under that authority

Jack Smith is an “inferior officer” under the Constitution who didn’t need to be confirmed by the Senate and remains subject to the “plenary supervision” of the AG — meaning he’s not operating completely free of any “constraints” or “accountability”

The AG has authority for these types of appointments under statutes 28 U.S.C. § § 509, 510, 515, and 533, and the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)

According to the US Code, 28 U.S.C. § 533 provides the legal authority for the Attorney General to appoint investigative officials, which can be used in conjunction with 28 C.F.R. § 600 to formally appoint a "Special Counsel" (essentially an independent counsel) when a conflict of interest or other extraordinary circumstances exist within the Department of Justice warranting an outside investigator to handle a criminal matter.
Key points about these statutes:

28 U.S.C. § 533:
This section broadly allows the Attorney General to appoint investigative officials to conduct investigations regarding official matters under the Department of Justice's control.

28 C.F.R. § 600:
This regulation within the Code of Federal Regulations specifically outlines the procedures and qualifications for appointing a Special Counsel, including situations where a conflict of interest exists within the Department of Justice, justifying the need for an independent investigator.

 

[struth]

Jack Smith is an “inferior officer” under the Constitution who didn’t need to be confirmed by the Senate and remains subject to the “plenary supervision” of the AG — meaning he’s not operating completely free of any “constraints” or “accountability”

The AG has authority for these types of appointments under statutes 28 U.S.C. § § 509, 510, 515, and 533, and the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)

According to the US Code, 28 U.S.C. § 533 provides the legal authority for the Attorney General to appoint investigative officials, which can be used in conjunction with 28 C.F.R. § 600 to formally appoint a "Special Counsel" (essentially an independent counsel) when a conflict of interest or other extraordinary circumstances exist within the Department of Justice warranting an outside investigator to handle a criminal matter.
Key points about these statutes:

28 U.S.C. § 533:
This section broadly allows the Attorney General to appoint investigative officials to conduct investigations regarding official matters under the Department of Justice's control.

28 C.F.R. § 600:
This regulation within the Code of Federal Regulations specifically outlines the procedures and qualifications for appointing a Special Counsel, including situations where a conflict of interest exists within the Department of Justice, justifying the need for an independent investigator.

US Attorneys have to be confirmed. Jack Smith was acting as a US Attorney in his roll as special prosecutor. The court has already ruled on this

I get you don’t like the court, nor respect the rule of law

 

[dudmuck]

US Attorneys have to be confirmed. Jack Smith was acting as a US Attorney in his roll as special prosecutor. The court has already ruled on this

I get you don’t like the court, nor respect the rule of law

i have cited law. You have not cited any law.

 

[struth]

i have cited law. You have not cited any law.

You didn’t cite any law.

The law is he was illegally appointed. The court has ruled. It’s binding case law l

 

[Clipper]

/——/ That’s just your buttsore TDS trying to come to grips with reality.

Hardly. I came to grips about Trump back in 2016 when I realized that he a flawed, loathsome craven lying pile of human garbage.

You idiots picked the worst human being born in the past 75 years to run this country. You jumped the shark twice, but keep trying to convince yourself that Trump isn't a corupt dirtbag.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Hardly. I came to grips about Trump back in 2016 when I realized that he a flawed, loathsome craven lying pile of human garbage.

You idiots picked the worst human being born in the past 75 years to run this country. You jumped the shark twice, but keep trying to convince yourself that Trump isn't a corupt dirtbag.

/—-/ Even if that is true, (It’s the complete opposite) the dementia patient and word salad spewing empty suit you put up were absolute disasters.
Harris and Biden could have threatened the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico years ago to stop the drugs and illegals. They didn’t because they want to tear the country down for their Socialist Nirvana.
Why did they allow 90% of fed workers to work from home while paying for empty office space?
So, slam Trump all you want.
Sit back and watch him fix it all.

 

[dudmuck]

You didn’t cite any law.

The law is he was illegally appointed. The court has ruled. It’s binding case law l

such ruling is faulty, since inferior officer doesnt need to be confirmed by senate because this officer is under plenary supervision of the AG

The AG has authority for these types of appointments under statutes 28 U.S.C. § § 509, 510, 515, and 533, and the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)

Such a ruling would immediately fail appeal due to these statues.

 

[Contumacious]

Jack Smith is an “inferior officer” under the Constitution who didn’t need to be confirmed by the Senate and remains subject to the “plenary supervision” of the AG — meaning he’s not operating completely free of any “constraints” or “accountability”

The AG has authority for these types of appointments under statutes 28 U.S.C. § § 509, 510, 515, and 533, and the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)

According to the US Code, 28 U.S.C. § 533 provides the legal authority for the Attorney General to appoint investigative officials, which can be used in conjunction with 28 C.F.R. § 600 to formally appoint a "Special Counsel" (essentially an independent counsel) when a conflict of interest or other extraordinary circumstances exist within the Department of Justice warranting an outside investigator to handle a criminal matter.
Key points about these statutes:

28 U.S.C. § 533:
This section broadly allows the Attorney General to appoint investigative officials to conduct investigations regarding official matters under the Department of Justice's control.

28 C.F.R. § 600:
This regulation within the Code of Federal Regulations specifically outlines the procedures and qualifications for appointing a Special Counsel, including situations where a conflict of interest exists within the Department of Justice, justifying the need for an independent investigator.

Jackass Smith's appointment unconstitutional​

He has no more authority than Taylor Swift,​

The argument is that the appointments clause requires all federal offices “not otherwise provided for” in the Constitution to be established by law. Yet there is no statute establishing the Office of Special Counsel within the U.S. Department of Justice. Nor is there a statute allowing the attorney general to appoint an inferior officer special counsel with the powers given to Smith. And inferior officers, in any event, must be controlled by a superior officer, but Garland doesn’t have that power over Smith under DOJ regulations.

Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues

Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.

www.abajournal.com

 

[struth]

such ruling is faulty, since inferior officer doesnt need to be confirmed by senate because this officer is under plenary supervision of the AG

The AG has authority for these types of appointments under statutes 28 U.S.C. § § 509, 510, 515, and 533, and the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)

Such a ruling would immediately fail appeal due to these statues.

US Attorneys aren’t inferior officers and need to be confirmed

None of those codes say a AG can appoint a US Attorney…they can’t also get around the constitution by appointing someone that isn’t already a US Attorney to do the job of one, and label them a special prosecutor

The case was not overturned on appeal and is the law. Read the case

 

[struth]

Jackass Smith's appointment unconstitutional​

He has no more authority than Taylor Swift,​

The argument is that the appointments clause requires all federal offices “not otherwise provided for” in the Constitution to be established by law. Yet there is no statute establishing the Office of Special Counsel within the U.S. Department of Justice. Nor is there a statute allowing the attorney general to appoint an inferior officer special counsel with the powers given to Smith. And inferior officers, in any event, must be controlled by a superior officer, but Garland doesn’t have that power over Smith under DOJ regulations.

Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues

Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.

www.abajournal.com

Pretty obvious he was illegally appointed

The only question is why did this lawless admin go to such great lengths?

Well reports are xiden was furious that garland would himself engage in the pollitical prosecutions, so they had to get someone willing to do the dirty work and Jack was the bagman for Obama, in particular with the McDonnell case that resulted in a crushing defeat for smith and his corrupt behavior, and they. Knew he couldn’t actually get appointed via the normal process so, as demafasict do, they ignored the law

 

[dudmuck]

US Attorneys aren’t inferior officers and need to be confirmed

None of those codes say a AG can appoint a US Attorney…they can’t also get around the constitution by appointing someone that isn’t already a US Attorney to do the job of one, and label them a special prosecutor

The case was not overturned on appeal and is the law. Read the case

its a special counsel appointment, not a us attorney appointment. The precedent for this are the previous appointments of John L Smith, and this media advisory from Bob Dole in 1994.

 

[struth]

its a special counsel appointment, not a us attorney appointment. The precedent for this are the previous appointments of John L Smith, and this media advisory from Bob Dole in 1994.

You can’t get around the constitution by labeling a US attorney a special prosecutor

Wait what the precedent for this are the previous appointments of him?? What?

The court heard arguements from Smith and found the facts here was he was illegally appointed


And fyi media advisories from 1994 aren’t precedent. Literally all he is citing is some codes, nobody has disagreed exist

 

[22lcidw]

such ruling is faulty, since inferior officer doesnt need to be confirmed by senate because this officer is under plenary supervision of the AG

The AG has authority for these types of appointments under statutes 28 U.S.C. § § 509, 510, 515, and 533, and the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)

Such a ruling would immediately fail appeal due to these statues.

All this law talk. Only when it is to your favor. Joe is all the evidence of your corrupted decay. You see nothing wrong with it.

 

[Contumacious]

Pretty obvious he was illegally appointed

The only question is why did this lawless admin go to such great lengths?

Well reports are xiden was furious that garland would himself engage in the pollitical prosecutions, so they had to get someone willing to do the dirty work and Jack was the bagman for Obama, in particular with the McDonnell case that resulted in a crushing defeat for smith and his corrupt behavior, and they. Knew he couldn’t actually get appointed via the normal process so, as demafasict do, they ignored the law

ELECTION INTERFERENCE - they wanted to prevent MAGA Republicans from voting for the candidate of their choice by ANY MEANS NECESSARY

 

[struth]

ELECTION INTERFERENCE - they wanted to prevent MAGA Republicans from voting for the candidate of their choice by ANY MEANS NECESSARY

Yes, they want to punish their political threats and take them out

Obama had Jack smith do this to Bob McDonnell…

 

[Clipper]

/—-/ Even if that is true, (It’s the complete opposite) the dementia patient and word salad spewing empty suit you put up were absolute disasters.
Harris and Biden could have threatened the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico years ago to stop the drugs and illegals. They didn’t because they want to tear the country down for their Socialist Nirvana.
Why did they allow 90% of fed workers to work from home while paying for empty office space?
So, slam Trump all you want.
Sit back and watch him fix it all.

His first term was a disaster & you cultists think he learned something? Sure. What's different this time around is his right wing MAGA bootlicker's gave the bastard immunity.

All we can do now is sit back & wait for the crime spree & screw job that is coming for working people.