Your exact words were "You live in a world of delusion. Free markets are checks and balances. Government has virtually none." Please go on and tell me how the "Free Market" would police itself and keep itself regulated. It certainly hasn't worked, ever.Kaz did. He said businesses would take care of themselves. Yes some regulations go beyond any normal scope but what kind of person believes that the corporations and businesses would regulate themselves. Kaz is simply showing his IQ level is far lower than any and every Bernie supporter.Who would keep your food and water safe? Who would control pollution, dangerous chemicals and deadly toxins entering your environment? Who would regulate health and safety regulations? Companies and corporations are not honest and already do everything they can to make a buck. You take all the regulations away and many people would die or get hurt than they already do. Only a complete moron would think businesses and corporations could regulate themselves.Yes, Joe, I do actually believe that I can make my own choices and I don't need government to make them for me like you do. That's just fucked up, isn't it?
I don't think anyone is arguing the point to remove all regulations. Believe it or not, we have no interest in eating tainted food or water any more than you do.
I mean, seriously, do we need Co2 regulations on dairy farms? How about regulations on farm dust? The point being, protecting health is fine, but the agencies become massive regulatory bureaucracies, infested by moral busy-bodies, and frankly, answerable to no one.
I'm not an anarchist, you fucking moron. I never said that strawman
Employee: If your employer sucks, you fire them and find a better one
Consumer: If a product sucks, you fire the producer and buy a better one
Why on earth would you ever do otherwise? Is it stupidity or laziness?