Ravi
Diamond Member
On the contrary, the parent has every right to prevent their children from being sexually active. If they don't the kid should not be forced to bear a child simply so you can shirk your own parental responsibilities.Here are your priorities:So parental rights mean nothing when it comes to anything involving sex, carte blanche? Abortion trumps all?
The problem is that the parents still have to deal with the aftermath of this situation. And before you bring up the "bad parents" scenario, there are all sorts of middle ground here. You would rather have children being exploited by someone other than thier parents if thier parents are pro-life.
What a set of priorities you have.
You'd rather have some poor child who is raped by a family member get permission from said family member for contraceptives just so the government will cover YOUR ass for being a poor parent.
Talk about a nanny state lover. bwahahahahahahaha!
This is about the government preventing parents from having say in thier childs lives, or information from medical professionals providing them with drugs or treatment?
YOUR side is the nanny state, presuming to take over parental responsibilities without the parent's stake in the situation, or even any real responsibility.
And as stated above there are legal remedies for this.