Judge Cannon just dismissed Smith's classified documents case against Trump

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You didn't know the difference between a US Attorney and the AG a few moments ago.....just stop.

As usual, you're FOS.

Jack Smith has been arguing his case in FL for months now

Again...........you're FOS.

Here are the lawyers arguing the case.​

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Jan 9, 2024 — Arguing for the special counsel: James I. Pearce, a career federal prosecutor who played a role in some Jan.


Arguing the case on behalf of the special counsel, Jack Smith, will be James I. Pearce, a career federal prosecutor who has worked in both the Justice Department’s public integrity section and in the appellate section of its criminal division.

Mr. Pearce has taken part not only in several sensitive legal battles that Mr. Smith has waged during the prosecution of Mr. Trump on the election interference charges, but he has also played a crucial role in supporting the cases against hundreds of rioters who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Judge presses prosecutors over Jack Smith's funding as ...​

Courthouse News Service
https://www.courthousenews.com › judge-presses-prose...
Jun 24, 2024 — FORT PIERCE, Fla. (CN) — Things got tense for federal prosecutors on Monday when U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon pressed them for details on ...

Trump’s attorney Emil Bove said Monday that prosecutors contradicted themselves when they argued last week that Smith was not truly “independent” from the Justice Department. If that’s true, Bove said, then Smith shouldn’t be getting the federal funding driving his case.

Bove told Cannon to reject arguments from prosecutors that Smith is still lawfully an independent counsel being rightfully driven by congressional-approved funding.

“Both cannot be true,” Bove argued, agreeing that there is a “mismatch in the degree of independence” that prosecutors are claiming of Smith.

But prosecutor James Pearce held that the “mismatch” Bove claimed is actually intrinsic to the position of special counsel.

“It is inherent,” Pearce said, arguing that such a balance is necessary to ensure both “accountability and independence” for special counsel.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Aldo raine doesn't know very much about a lot of things.

But he screams loudly, and with great vigor!

See above........RETARD.

 

[hadit]

Criminal.................... TRAITORS.

Trump and his cult are above the law.
Thanks to teabaggers.........Who LOVE corruption.

You mad, brah?

 

[Captain Caveman]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/politics/classified-documents-case-trump-dismissed-aileen-cannon

Good. Now we need the J6 case dismissed as well.

The cases against Trump, as stated in the link, are just political attacks. Those that claim no one is above the law, show consistency and sue every past president too.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You mad, brah?

Corruption should make normal people mad.
Some people embrace it....................

Along with his cult.

 

[struth]

As usual, you're FOS.

Again...........you're FOS.

Here are the lawyers arguing the case.​

View attachment 978260
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Jan 9, 2024 — Arguing for the special counsel: James I. Pearce, a career federal prosecutor who played a role in some Jan.


Arguing the case on behalf of the special counsel, Jack Smith, will be James I. Pearce, a career federal prosecutor who has worked in both the Justice Department’s public integrity section and in the appellate section of its criminal division.

Mr. Pearce has taken part not only in several sensitive legal battles that Mr. Smith has waged during the prosecution of Mr. Trump on the election interference charges, but he has also played a crucial role in supporting the cases against hundreds of rioters who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Judge presses prosecutors over Jack Smith's funding as ...​

View attachment 978258
Courthouse News Service
https://www.courthousenews.com › judge-presses-prose...
Jun 24, 2024 — FORT PIERCE, Fla. (CN) — Things got tense for federal prosecutors on Monday when U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon pressed them for details on ...

Trump’s attorney Emil Bove said Monday that prosecutors contradicted themselves when they argued last week that Smith was not truly “independent” from the Justice Department. If that’s true, Bove said, then Smith shouldn’t be getting the federal funding driving his case.

Bove told Cannon to reject arguments from prosecutors that Smith is still lawfully an independent counsel being rightfully driven by congressional-approved funding.

“Both cannot be true,” Bove argued, agreeing that there is a “mismatch in the degree of independence” that prosecutors are claiming of Smith.

But prosecutor James Pearce held that the “mismatch” Bove claimed is actually intrinsic to the position of special counsel.

“It is inherent,” Pearce said, arguing that such a balance is necessary to ensure both “accountability and independence” for special counsel.

You don’t know the difference between the AG and US Attorneys and district attorneys

Heck you thought a fed reg supersede the constitution

You are helplessly clueless

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You don’t know the difference between the AG and US Attorneys and district attorneys

LIE.

Heck you thought a fed reg supersede the constitution

LIE.

You are helplessly clueless

You're a clueless LIAR.

 

[Rogue AI]

So you're saying that every special counsel has been approved by the senate? The US attorney has the authority to approve it unilaterally. A senate confirmation isn't necessary. There are countless cases of this throughout history.

The problem is a matter of proper oversight. Which is lacking if the position is created without an act of Congress. It's more than just Senate confirmation. I was previously in error in other posts on that matter. What Justice Thomas indicated goes beyond just the Senate and through the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. This is a matter of separation of powers and not allowing the executive unlimited and unauthorized prosecutorial powers. All of which fits nicely into this Court’s trend towards addressing the imbalances of decades of terrible policies and practices.

 

[hadit]

Corruption should make normal people mad.
Some people embrace it....................

View attachment 978271

Along with his cult.

Thank goodness that's not going on, that would be bad.