What is wrong with the Supreme Court these days? Brunson case RE overturning distrusted results of the 2020 election.

[g5000]

what a lie

Leftists love their lies, don't they?

as Trump would say

Sad...

 

[task0778]

Maybe there only half as crazy as we thought?
Or are concerned about the distrust of the highest court in Our country.

No, their concern is to interpret the Constitution and federal law, as fairly and unbiased as possible. And in this case there is absolutely nothing for them base their ruling on, nothing to interpret. The simple truth is that there are existing procedures to remove a president if proof is presented in enough states that election fraud did occur and was sufficient to alter the outcome. If the president refuses to resign then the Congress can impeach him/her and force him out of office. But the Supreme Court has no authority to do that. It's not a question of distrust.

 

[notmyfault2020]

oh wow... a made up photo!

Well, there goes my support for Trump. I cannot support him after seeing him in this kind of humiliating photo, even though it's fake..

how utterly ridiculous you are

 

[Billiejeens]

you mean Accept, right?

and if we can't restore it through legal channels, how can we?

Illegal means

 

[Lesh]

Illegal means

That’s the Trumper motto

 

[notmyfault2020]

No, their concern is to interpret the Constitution and federal law, as fairly and unbiased as possible. And in this case there is absolutely nothing for them base their ruling on, nothing to interpret. The simple truth is that there are existing procedures to remove a president if proof is presented in enough states that election fraud did occur and was sufficient to alter the outcome. If the president refuses to resign then the Congress can impeach him/her and force him out of office. But the Supreme Court has no authority to do that. It's not a question of distrust.

doesn't the SC have the responsibility to make sure laws are enforced, esp the Constitution? What good does it do for the legislative branch to pass laws and no one has to adhere to them?

makes no damn sense

 

[Magnus]

like I really care what some dumbass liberal thinks of my mental condition. Again, you liberals refuse to look at the evidence and then VOILA'!

There's no evidence!

dumb

Liberal don’t want to look at evidence? Who are the liberals in this scenario? The SC Justices?

 

[notmyfault2020]

Illegal means

oh, did I mis-read that?

whew...

I tended to think we still had some kind of legal means of changing things...

 

[notmyfault2020]

Liberal don’t want to look at evidence? Who are the liberals in this scenario? The SC Justices?

I haven't met ONE liberal yet who has looked at or WANTS to look at the evidence of fraud in the 2020 election

not ONE.

 

[Lesh]

I haven't met ONE liberal yet who has looked at or WANTS to look at the evidence of fraud in the 2020 election

not ONE.

We’ve all seen this “evidence” and it’s a collection of misrepresentations, whack job conspiracies, and outright lies

 

[task0778]

doesn't the SC have the responsibility to make sure laws are enforced, esp the Constitution? What good does it do for the legislative branch to pass laws and no one has to adhere to them?

makes no damn sense

What laws are you talking about? I do not know of anything in the US Constitution or existing federal law that deals with overturning an election. And BTW, the SC does not enforce the laws, that is the job of the Executive Branch. The SC rules on what is legal and constitutional based on their interpretation of the US Constitution and existing federal law. If there is no law or reference to an issue, then the Court cannot rule on it, that's why they shit-canned the Roe v Wade decision.

 

[notmyfault2020]

We’ve all seen this “evidence” and it’s a collection of misrepresentations, whack job conspiracies, and outright lies

liar. You haven't seen a damn thing.

But liars gonna lie

 

[notmyfault2020]

What laws are you talking about? I do not know of anything in the US Constitution or existing federal law that deals with overturning an election. And BTW, the SC does not enforce the laws, that is the job of the Executive Branch. The SC rules on what is legal and constitutional based on their interpretation of the US Constitution and existing federal law. If there is no law or reference to an issue, then the Court cannot rule on it, that's why they shit-canned the Roe v Wade decision.

Well, I knew most of this. The only part I was not aware of was that, according to you, if there is no law on the books, they cannot rule on it. But I am not sure that is written in stone? I'm not saying it shouldn't be the case; maybe it should. But if there is some kind of urgent situation going on, esp one that affects national security...

Please show a reference... a site or something..

 

[g5000]

I haven't met ONE liberal yet who has looked at or WANTS to look at the evidence of fraud in the 2020 election

not ONE.

You won't find very many people who WANT to look at the evidence Joe Biden is a lizard alien creature from Tralfamadore, either.

It must be a conspiracy!

 

[notmyfault2020]

Oh, I thought I had a response to read from an intelligent person like Task0778

sigh.....

 

[Lesh]

liar. You haven't seen a damn thing.

But liars gonna lie

I’ve seen what thee is to see.

And you’re right. There’s not a damn thing worth seeing

 

[task0778]

Well, I knew most of this. The only part I was not aware of was that, according to you, if there is no law on the books, they cannot rule on it. But I am not sure that is written in stone? I'm not saying it shouldn't be the case; maybe it should. But if there is some kind of urgent situation going on, esp one that affects national security...

Please show a reference... a site or something..

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes.

Introduction To The Federal Court System

www.justice.gov

To my knowledge there is no reference in the US Constitution or in federal law when it comes to overturning an election. Which means the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to make a ruling, simply because every ruling they make has to be rooted somewhere in the US Constitution or in federal law.

 

[Billiejeens]

doesn't the SC have the responsibility to make sure laws are enforced, esp the Constitution? What good does it do for the legislative branch to pass laws and no one has to adhere to them?

makes no damn sense

Republicans still have to adhere to them
US law doesn't apply to Democrats

 

[Billiejeens]

That’s the Trumper motto

I wish.

 

[BlindBoo]

doesn't the SC have the responsibility to make sure laws are enforced, esp the Constitution? What good does it do for the legislative branch to pass laws and no one has to adhere to them?

makes no damn sense

The Constitution gives the States the power to make their election laws. It does not give Congress the power to over turn a states certified election.