What Offense Did the Ukrainian People Commit That Caused Them to Be Bombed into Oblivion by The Russian Military at the Command of Putin?

[TruthNotBS]

OR WHAT? He will press the button to turn Russia into burned nuclear wasteland?

Thats the fundamental part of nuclear deterance you don't seem to get.

NATO threatens that deterence, by deploying American missiles right on Russia's doorstep. What did we do when the Soviets wanted to deploy their missiles in Cuba? We almost fought a nuclear war over that. Your question "or what", is answered by what we see now in Ukraine. Like Duh. It's a conventional war, right now, but since NATO is escalating that war from being a proxy war in Ukraine to one where NATO and Ukraine are firing missiles deep into Russia and being attacked by the Russian military. It's not just going to be Ukraine getting attacked, but NATO countries as well. You're blinded by your hatred for Russia.

 

[TruthNotBS]

The “us”is you and Putin.

And I doubt he is suicidal

The us is you, me, and every other American, being nuked by Russia, due to your shit-foreign policy.

 

[AntonToo]

NATO threatens that deterence, by deploying American missiles right on Russia's doorstep.

You mean like in Finland that is 100 miles from St.Pete?

Because Russia had zero reaction to Finalnd becoming NATO member, so obivously your claims are half-baked bs.

 

[jwoodie]

Okay thanks. So this is kind of off on a tangent, but aside from the whole states rights & slavery issues, what was the United States fearful of had the south successfully seceded and founded their own country? What dangers would that have posed to the Union?

Duty-free ports.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You mean like in Finland that is 100 miles from St.Pete?

Because Russia had zero reaction to Finalnd becoming NATO member, so obivously your claims are half-baked bs.

Because the scared little Kremlin man is scared of Finland.

 

[TruthNotBS]

You mean like in Finland that is 100 miles from St.Pete?

Because Russia had zero reaction to Finalnd becoming NATO member, so obivously your claims are half-baked bs.

While Finland has joined NATO, it has no intention of hosting nuclear weapons on its territory. Finnish leaders, including President Sauli Niinistö, have emphasized that there are no plans to place nuclear arms in Finland. However, Russia has responded by deploying tactical nuclear weapons near the border region with Finland as a deterrent following its accession to NATO.

Have the miso-Russophobic Antons (the pieces of shit) in the Finnish government, made Finland any safer? No, they haven't. Finland is in a very precarious position now, as a NATO member, ironically, after many years of being neutral toward Russia and NATO.

Finland aside, this is the reality:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/12/europe/putin-warns-nato-missiles-hnk-latam-intl/index.html

​

Your foreign policy led to instability and war in Ukraine and is now possibly leading to WW3.

 

[AntonToo]

While Finland has joined NATO, it has no intention of hosting nuclear weapons on its territory.

But Ukraine does and you know this because...well you don't know it, but you'll claim it anyway because thats what sustaining a loser argument requires.

 

[TruthNotBS]

But Ukraine does and you know this because...well you don't know it, but you'll claim it anyway because thats what sustaining a loser argument requires.

The loser foreign policy from the get-go is yours, causing unnecessary instability in the region by insisting NATO be deployed there.

Finland maintained neutrality throughout the Cold War, avoiding deeper entanglements with NATO until recent years, whereas Ukraine, especially after 2014, became central to a geopolitical struggle involving NATO and Russia. Ukraine's history with Russia is much more complex, involving shared governance and deep political ties, making NATO's presence more provocative in Ukraine than in Finland. For whatever reason, Russia has drawn the line in Ukraine and it's a lower policy for us to cross that line

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

While Finland has joined NATO, it has no intention of hosting nuclear weapons on its territory.

It doesn't need them to dominate the incompetent, outdated Russian army.

That's why sissy boy left Finland alone.

 

[TruthNotBS]

It doesn't need them to dominate the incompetent, outdated Russian army.

That's why sissy boy left Finland alone.

Finland isn't safer now, with the new nuclear missiles deployed near its border with Russia. Those Russian missiles weren't there before Finland joined NATO.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Finland isn't safer now, with the new nuclear missiles deployed near its border with Russia. Those Russian missiles weren't there before Finland joined NATO.

Finland is of course much safer, now that it is part of NATO. Nothing terrifies sissy boy more than NATO. That's why he is peeing in his little panties and making offensive nuke threats.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Finland is of course much safer, now that it is part of NATO. Nothing terrifies sissy boy more than NATO. That's why he is peeing in his little panties and making offensive nuke threats.

I hope you're correct about Putin being a sissy and when Ukraine with NATO start firing those long-range missiles into Russia, hitting important strategic sites, Putin isn't going to do a thing. I hope your fantasy is true, for your sake and mine.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I hope you're correct about Putin being a sissy and when Ukraine with NATO start firing those long-range missiles into Russia, hitting important strategic sites, Putin isn't going to do a thing. I hope your fantasy is true, for your sake and mine.

Oh, the sissy bully will do something to Ukraine, as he sees them as weak.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Oh, the sissy bully will do something to Ukraine, as he sees them as weak.

Assuming that's all he will do and not target sites in NATO member countries, why would you want to continue with this war, which leads to more carnage and devastation for Ukraine? You're quite delusional if you think Russia can't be pushed into fighting a direct war with NATO. You're heedless and naive.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Are you familiar with the Russian language? Kind of funny to see you calling Anton Antoshka.

Indeed

 

[d0gbreath]

It’s pretty simple that Putin believes Ukraine should be under his leadership. The primary language there is Russian. About 35% of the citizens consider themselves to be Russian. Zelenskyy allegedly embraced Nazis, who Putin despises and he doesn’t like Ukraine toying with the western allies. This isn’t complicated

He longs for the days of the USSR. It was really huge. Russia not so much. How does anyone embrace Nazis when there aren't any? There are western allies. So that's a valid point.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He longs for the days of the USSR. It was really huge. Russia not so much. How does anyone embrace Nazis when there aren't any? There are western allies. So that's a valid point.

He longs for the days of the USSR. It was really huge. Russia not so much. How does anyone embrace Nazis when there aren't any? There are western allies. So that's a valid point.

He is talking about these folks

Azov Brigade - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[d0gbreath]

He is talking about these folks

Azov Brigade - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Are they a part of Ukrainian forces?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Assuming that's all he will do and not target sites in NATO member countries, why would you want to continue with this war, which leads to more carnage and devastation for Ukraine? You're quite delusional if you think Russia can't be pushed into fighting a direct war with NATO. You're heedless and naive.

To save Ukraine. To defeat the maniac. To deter other maniacs. Tonoet countries know that we stand with democratic nations.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Are they a part of Ukrainian forces?

That’s the big question