What to do with Uncle Joe?

[jknowgood]

Will be voting for Trump who is an adjudicated sexual assaulter, fraudster and convicted felon?

Lol, in your kangaroo courts. Yes, I am. The amount of hatred you got for him, makes me support him more.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

He wasn't convicted of rape, no matter what the judge thinks.

What the judge said or thinks? Hmm...

Judge in E. Jean Carroll Case: Yes, Donald Trump Is a Rapist​

A judge rejected Trump’s semantic attempt to throw out the case.​

But Judge Lewis Kaplan called Trump’s semantic argument “entirely unpersuasive.” He clarified that the jury found that the former president did indeed “rape” Carroll based on the common definition of the word.

Kaplan noted that New York penal law (the jury in the Carroll case was based in New York) has a “far narrower” definition of the word “rape” than in “common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere.”

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’” Kaplan wrote.

Judge in E. Jean Carroll Case: Yes, Donald Trump Is a Rapist

A judge rejected Trump’s semantic attempt to throw out the case.

newrepublic.com

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"

In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."

Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"

 

[jknowgood]

Didn't say the convicted felon Trump was "convicted" of rape. This election: The Prosecutor vs the Convicted Felon, Sexual Predator/Rapist

It was a civil court judgement. Judged by a jury of his peers (NYC residents). Why? The clock ran out on the criminal case. Civil? Preponderance of evidence.

Preponderance: a superiority in weight, power, importance, or strength. 2. a. : a superiority or excess in number or quantity.
Preponderance refers to the evidentiary standard necessary for a victory in a civil case. Proving a proposition by the preponderance of the evidence requires demonstrating that the proposition is more likely true than not true.

preponderance of the evidence

www.law.cornell.edu

Don't you loons get tired of Trump kicking your ass? I mean every time you think you have him. He gets away.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Don't you loons get tired of Trump kicking your ass? I mean every time you think you have him. He gets away.

2020

O'tay

 

[jknowgood]

And yet another dodge, deflection and whataboutism.

Post a lie, dodge.
Post a lie, dodge.
Post a lie, dodge.

It's a boring routine.

The truth is the truth, the witnesses were liars.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Lol, in your kangaroo courts. Yes, I am. The amount of hatred you got for him, makes me support him more.

Now it's the courts fault! The jurors did it! Deep state! So predictable.

You are voting for an adjudicated sexual assaulter, fraudster and convicted felon.

That is a fact.

 

[jknowgood]

Now it's the courts fault! The jurors did it! Deep state! So predictable.

You are voting for an adjudicated sexual assaulter, fraudster and convicted felon.

That is a fact.

Lol, no you rigged the courts and the judges and he still comes out good. Doesn't that just burn your ass?

 

[Catsnmeters]

The truth is the truth, the witnesses were liars.

Right on time. Good job.

The case was not contingent on Cohen's testimony.

The jurors and court were aware of Cohen's history of lying for Trump. His statements were admissable.

Any more excuses you want to parrot from your right wing news sources?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Lol, no you rigged the courts and the judges and he still comes out good. Doesn't that just burn your ass?

You think it's good you will vote for an adjudicated sexual assaulter and fraudster and convicted felon?

And your excuse is conspiracy?

Sad.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

What's scary is after the debate they still have him running the country. The enemies are loving this, savoring when to ATTACK us!

 

[Catsnmeters]

What's scary is after the debate they still have him running the country. The enemies are loving this, savoring when to ATTACK us!

What's awesome is after Harris entered the race our enemies are terrified that Trump is going to lose and won't support their fascism. Our allies are savoring this!