Where are the keep your laws of my body libs here? Forced chemo?

[JoeB131]

It is for thousands of women who regret for life for having an abortion.

Yeah, I never met one of those. Maybe if they avoided hanging around with religious nuts, they wouldn't feel bad about nothing.

 

[jknowgood]

It is for thousands of women who regret for life for having an abortion.

Yeah, I never met one of those. Maybe if they avoided hanging around with religious nuts, they wouldn't feel bad about nothing.

When you kill an innocent child, you reap the consequences.

 

[hazlnut]

Connecticut Teen Fighting State Over Forced Chemotherapy Treatments - Hartford Courant

These same liberals would throw shitfits if she had to get a sonogram for an abortion, but they will force her to take chemotherapy?

Apples and oranges, moron.

 

[hazlnut]

It is for thousands of women who regret for life for having an abortion.

Yeah, I never met one of those. Maybe if they avoided hanging around with religious nuts, they wouldn't feel bad about nothing.

When you kill an innocent child, you reap the consequences.

Why do we assume the unborn child is "innocent"? Hitler and Adam Lanza were both fetuses at one time.

Why do you assume to know God's will? An abortion is the extension of God's will. The child was never meant to be. Problem solved.

 

[jknowgood]

It is for thousands of women who regret for life for having an abortion.

Yeah, I never met one of those. Maybe if they avoided hanging around with religious nuts, they wouldn't feel bad about nothing.

When you kill an innocent child, you reap the consequences.

Why do we assume the unborn child is "innocent"? Hitler and Adam Lanza were both fetuses at one time.

Why do you assume to know God's will? An abortion is the extension of God's will. The child was never meant to be. Problem solved.

With the birth of Obama your starting to make a point.

 

[bendog]

It all started when liberal judges started interfering with 7th Day Adventists GOD GIVEN RIGHT to watch their children die instead of letting them have antibiotics. We need to take our nation back! (-:

 

[Jarlaxle]

In abortion you say you cannot tell a woman what to do with her body, but in this case your all for it. Hypocrite.

I don't think a 17 year old has a sufficient understanding of mortality so comprehend, "If you don't get this treatment, you are going to DIE!!!" She is thinking, "Oh my GOd, my hair is going to fall out?

As long as her parents approve (and they seem to approve of her actions here), she could enlist. You fail, as always.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I'm liberal. She's not an adult....but the decision is hers and her family's. The OP fails to understand what liberals stand for. As usual.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

In abortion you say you cannot tell a woman what to do with her body, but in this case your all for it. Hypocrite.

I don't think a 17 year old has a sufficient understanding of mortality so comprehend, "If you don't get this treatment, you are going to DIE!!!" She is thinking, "Oh my GOd, my hair is going to fall out?

Ordinarily that would be the case but not for a late teen with a terminal illness. It is near impossible not to understand this consequence.

 

[JoeB131]

It is for thousands of women who regret for life for having an abortion.

Yeah, I never met one of those. Maybe if they avoided hanging around with religious nuts, they wouldn't feel bad about nothing.

When you kill an innocent child, you reap the consequences.

Yes, you get to go on with your life, unburdened by a responsibility you weren't ready for.

I'm still waiting for you nutters to tell me how you are going to enforce an anti-abortion law. Are you going to throw the women in jail?

 

[JoeB131]

In abortion you say you cannot tell a woman what to do with her body, but in this case your all for it. Hypocrite.

I don't think a 17 year old has a sufficient understanding of mortality so comprehend, "If you don't get this treatment, you are going to DIE!!!" She is thinking, "Oh my GOd, my hair is going to fall out?

Ordinarily that would be the case but not for a late teen with a terminal illness. It is near impossible not to understand this consequence.

teenagers died every day because they don't understand the consequences of their actions.

 

[Skull Pilot]

okay, so it's really not the same as an abortion. It's a child trying to kill herself and the state stepping in to stop her.

Wrong.

Refusing medical treatment is a personal choice. Her parents support her decision.

It's not anyone's business but theirs.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

In abortion you say you cannot tell a woman what to do with her body, but in this case your all for it. Hypocrite.

I don't think a 17 year old has a sufficient understanding of mortality so comprehend, "If you don't get this treatment, you are going to DIE!!!" She is thinking, "Oh my GOd, my hair is going to fall out?

Ordinarily that would be the case but not for a late teen with a terminal illness. It is near impossible not to understand this consequence.

teenagers died every day because they don't understand the consequences of their actions.

Yea, that is why I said ordinarily which are not known outcomes like in this case. If you are so sure of what you are talking about, give me one example of what you mean.

 

[Katzndogz]

The high court just sided with the lower court in affirming forced treatment. The court found that the girl was not mature enough to make this decision and the decision might have been made because of her mother's influence not because of an independent opinion. In other words, the girl decided not to have chemo because her mother was badgering her into refusing.

 

[novasteve]

Connecticut 8217 s highest court approves forced chemotherapy for teen - The Washington Post

Lib hypocrisy at its finest. She will be forced to get chemo because she isn't mature enough to make the decision, but if she wanted a sex change the same liberals would be all requiring her to be allowed to have a medically uncessary procedure.

\Liberals are insane and hypocrites.

 

[novasteve]

The high court just sided with the lower court in affirming forced treatment. The court found that the girl was not mature enough to make this decision and the decision might have been made because of her mother's influence not because of an independent opinion. In other words, the girl decided not to have chemo because her mother was badgering her into refusing.

That's such a libfag excuse. And what about the parents who insist their 5 year olds are transgender?

 

[Katzndogz]

It will be 9 months before the girl will be 18 and able to make her own decisions. At which time, the chemo will be done and she might well be in remission.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Hey, Tranny-Steve, the link you posted requires a subscription.

the link worked fine for me you idiot

 

[jon_berzerk]

okay, so it's really not the same as an abortion. It's a child trying to kill herself and the state stepping in to stop her.

what business is that of yours

or the states for that matter

 

[jon_berzerk]

By liberal standards it's her body and no one can tell her what to do with body. Mind your own business.

certainly