Where are the threads about the FBI finding Hillary's Emails were never hacked?

[paperview]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

Not true.

 

[ClosedCaption]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

It is true.

 

[Freewill]

The truth is, it doesn't matter if they were hacked, as to whether she is guilty or not.

But nothing is going to happen, she is a protected insider.

That is true. The best we can hope for is enough scandal to dog her long enough to retire the Clinton brand.

The voters will need to remove the last of the Clintons, I hope the last. I think it can and will be done.

 

[Freewill]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

Then what is their reason? Just in case they say the wrong thing?

 

[hadit]

The truth is, it doesn't matter if they were hacked, as to whether she is guilty or not.

But nothing is going to happen, she is a protected insider.

That is true. The best we can hope for is enough scandal to dog her long enough to retire the Clinton brand.

The voters will need to remove the last of the Clintons, I hope the last. I think it can and will be done.

It can be done. Hillary is a terrible candidate and eminently beatable.

 

[hadit]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

Then what is their reason? Just in case they say the wrong thing?

If someone accepts immunity, they can't invoke the 5th Amendment, which means they have to answer all the questions. In this case, it may mean that the witness will run afoul of the Clinton machine, and that's not a good thing for him.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

Then what is their reason? Just in case they say the wrong thing?

If someone accepts immunity, they can't invoke the 5th Amendment, which means they have to answer all the questions. In this case, it may mean that the witness will run afoul of the Clinton machine, and that's not a good thing for him.

That's right. People who are squeaky clean aren't given immunity.

And the government doesn't give someone immunity, unless they have some incrminating information to offer in exchange.

 

[ClosedCaption]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

Then what is their reason? Just in case they say the wrong thing?

You tell me. All I'm saying is that what you said earlier was bullshit

 

[blackhawk]

Let's get the facts right shall we the IT specialist who was just given immunity told the FBI there was nothing in the security logs to suggest the emails had been successfully hacked he never said for a fact they have not been. Now I'm not an expert hacker but I suspect those who are would know how to hack without something showing up in the security logs and none of this changes the fact she should have never been using her own private server.

 

[paperview]

Let's get the facts right shall we the IT specialist who was just given immunity

Point of order: He was given immunity last year.

... Now I'm not an expert hacker but I suspect those who are would know how to hack without something showing up in the security logs

It's possible, but all indications of studying the logs and forensics done show no evidence of hacking on her server.

...and none of this changes the fact she should have never been using her own private server.

Had she used a State.gov account, it would have been worse, re; being compromised.

Why? The State.gov servers were hacked.

 

[blackhawk]

Let's get the facts right shall we the IT specialist who was just given immunity

Point of order: He was given immunity last year.

... Now I'm not an expert hacker but I suspect those who are would know how to hack without something showing up in the security logs

It's possible, but all indications of studying the logs and forensics done show no evidence of hacking on her server.

...and none of this changes the fact she should have never been using her own private server.

Had she used a State.gov account, it would have been worse, re; being compromised.

Why? The State.gov servers were hacked.

To my knowledge the studying of the logs and the claim they were not hacked came from her IT guy I have not heard the FBI say that. Even if the servers were hacked it does not change the fact she shouldn't have been using a private one. I for one don't care for the idea of government officials deciding on their own which laws and rules they want to follow and which ones they don't.

 

[paperview]

Let's get the facts right shall we the IT specialist who was just given immunity

Point of order: He was given immunity last year.

... Now I'm not an expert hacker but I suspect those who are would know how to hack without something showing up in the security logs

It's possible, but all indications of studying the logs and forensics done show no evidence of hacking on her server.

...and none of this changes the fact she should have never been using her own private server.

Had she used a State.gov account, it would have been worse, re; being compromised.

Why? The State.gov servers were hacked.

To my knowledge the studying of the logs and the claim they were not hacked came from her IT guy I have not heard the FBI say that. Even if the servers were hacked it does not change the fact she shouldn't have been using a private one. I for one don't care for the idea of government officials deciding on their own which laws and rules they want to follow and which ones they don't.

It wasn't against the rules, and certainly not against the law.. It was, in hindsight, not wise, but not against the rules.

"In addition to the classified email system used in SCIFs, there are personal email accounts.

Prior to 2013, these could be accounts inside the relatively unsecure State Department system or private email accounts. If they are private—running through a commercial or personal server—they have to follow some rules set up in the Federal Register . There are no guards, no red-black procedures, no construction rules, no special rooms, no TEMPEST, no TSCM. And most important: Until 2013, there was no rule against using them. In fact, the rules specifically allowed for them. Check out the relevant section in the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR Chapter XII, Subchapter B, section 1236.22b) for the rules regarding the use of personal email accounts by any State Department official.

To give an idea of how insecure these communications could be, Powell’s personal email is an AOL account, and he used it on a laptop when he communicated with foreign officials and ambassadors, unless the information qualified for a SCIF...."

The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

 

[blackhawk]

Let's get the facts right shall we the IT specialist who was just given immunity

Point of order: He was given immunity last year.

... Now I'm not an expert hacker but I suspect those who are would know how to hack without something showing up in the security logs

It's possible, but all indications of studying the logs and forensics done show no evidence of hacking on her server.

...and none of this changes the fact she should have never been using her own private server.

Had she used a State.gov account, it would have been worse, re; being compromised.

Why? The State.gov servers were hacked.

To my knowledge the studying of the logs and the claim they were not hacked came from her IT guy I have not heard the FBI say that. Even if the servers were hacked it does not change the fact she shouldn't have been using a private one. I for one don't care for the idea of government officials deciding on their own which laws and rules they want to follow and which ones they don't.

It wasn't against the rules, and certainly not against the law.. It was, in hindsight, not wise, but not against the rules.

"In addition to the classified email system used in SCIFs, there are personal email accounts.

Prior to 2013, these could be accounts inside the relatively unsecure State Department system or private email accounts. If they are private—running through a commercial or personal server—they have to follow some rules set up in the Federal Register . There are no guards, no red-black procedures, no construction rules, no special rooms, no TEMPEST, no TSCM. And most important: Until 2013, there was no rule against using them. In fact, the rules specifically allowed for them. Check out the relevant section in the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR Chapter XII, Subchapter B, section 1236.22b) for the rules regarding the use of personal email accounts by any State Department official.

To give an idea of how insecure these communications could be, Powell’s personal email is an AOL account, and he used it on a laptop when he communicated with foreign officials and ambassadors, unless the information qualified for a SCIF...."

The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

The FBI does not get involved in matters of poor judgement.

 

[paperview]

Let's get the facts right shall we the IT specialist who was just given immunity

Point of order: He was given immunity last year.

... Now I'm not an expert hacker but I suspect those who are would know how to hack without something showing up in the security logs

It's possible, but all indications of studying the logs and forensics done show no evidence of hacking on her server.

...and none of this changes the fact she should have never been using her own private server.

Had she used a State.gov account, it would have been worse, re; being compromised.

Why? The State.gov servers were hacked.

To my knowledge the studying of the logs and the claim they were not hacked came from her IT guy I have not heard the FBI say that. Even if the servers were hacked it does not change the fact she shouldn't have been using a private one. I for one don't care for the idea of government officials deciding on their own which laws and rules they want to follow and which ones they don't.

It wasn't against the rules, and certainly not against the law.. It was, in hindsight, not wise, but not against the rules.

"In addition to the classified email system used in SCIFs, there are personal email accounts.

Prior to 2013, these could be accounts inside the relatively unsecure State Department system or private email accounts. If they are private—running through a commercial or personal server—they have to follow some rules set up in the Federal Register . There are no guards, no red-black procedures, no construction rules, no special rooms, no TEMPEST, no TSCM. And most important: Until 2013, there was no rule against using them. In fact, the rules specifically allowed for them. Check out the relevant section in the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR Chapter XII, Subchapter B, section 1236.22b) for the rules regarding the use of personal email accounts by any State Department official.

To give an idea of how insecure these communications could be, Powell’s personal email is an AOL account, and he used it on a laptop when he communicated with foreign officials and ambassadors, unless the information qualified for a SCIF...."

The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

The FBI does not get involved in matters of poor judgement.

What a dumb thing to say.

They investigate potential security breaches, and that's what they are doing.

From the OIG Office

"IC IG made a referral detailing the potential compromise of classified information to security official s within the Executive Branch . The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government's possession .

An important distinction is that the IC IG did not make a criminal referral - it was a security referral made for counterintelligence purposes .

The IC IG is statutorily required to refer potential compromises of national security information to the appropriate IC security officials."

.

 

[Freewill]

People get immunity for a number of reasons

The reason people get immunity, is because they committed a crime and they have information that may convict other people

You wish that was true

Then what is their reason? Just in case they say the wrong thing?

If someone accepts immunity, they can't invoke the 5th Amendment, which means they have to answer all the questions. In this case, it may mean that the witness will run afoul of the Clinton machine, and that's not a good thing for him.

In my opinion, anyone willing to testify against the Clinton regime might be talking to Vince Foster before they ever get close to talking to a prosecutor.

 

[bridgeport]

Hacker ‘Guccifer,’ who uncovered Clinton’s private emails, to be extradited to US

Yep.. Guccifer hacked into Sid Blumenthal's email a few years ago, where Guccifer uncovered correspondence between Hillary (hdr22) and Sid.

Below is link to yesterdays article, showing what fbi may be interested in:

Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Released Clinton emails found below:

Virtual Reading Room Documents Search Results: U.S. Department of State - Freedom of Information Act


---

 

[paperview]

Hacker ‘Guccifer,’ who uncovered Clinton’s private emails, to be extradited to US

Yep.. Guccifer hacked into Sid Blumenthal's email a few years ago, where Guccifer uncovered correspondence between Hillary (hdr22) and Sid.

Below is link to yesterdays article, showing what fbi may be interested in:

Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Released Clinton emails found below:

Virtual Reading Room Documents Search Results: U.S. Department of State - Freedom of Information Act


---

lol. "article"

That "medium" link is one guys post on a community board. A guy that has a total of ONE, countem' ONE follower.

(is that you?)