OriginalShroom
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2013
- 4,950
- 1,042
If even one iota of this information made it to Obama either before or afterwards and he has kept it covered up, this is impeachable.
I doubt if many Democrats in the Senate would see it that way and the kneepadders in the Media will ignore it...
I doubt if many Democrats in the Senate would see it that way and the kneepadders in the Media will ignore it...
White House, IRS exchanged confidential taxpayer info | The Daily Caller
White House, IRS exchanged confidential taxpayer info
Top Internal Revenue Service Obamacare official Sarah Hall Ingram discussed confidential taxpayer information with senior Obama White House officials, according to 2012 emails obtained by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and provided to The Daily Caller.
Lois Lerner, then head of the IRS Tax Exempt Organizations division, also received an email alongside White House officials that contained confidential information.
Ingram attempted to counsel the White House on a lawsuit from religious organizations opposing Obamacares contraception mandate. Email exchanges involving Ingram and White House officials including White House health policy advisor Ellen Montz and deputy assistant to the president for health policy Jeanne Lambrew contained confidential taxpayer information, according to Oversight.
The emails provided to Oversight investigators by the IRS had numerous redactions with the signifier 6103.
Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code forbids a federal employee from disclos[ing] any return or return information obtained by him in any manner in connection with his service as such an officer or an employee.
Federal employees who illegally disclose confidential taxpayer information could face five years in prison.
Thanks, David. Thanks for the information on [6103], White House official Lambrew wrote to IRS official David Fish in a July 20, 2012 exchange. I am still hoping to understand whether the 50 percent rule is moot if the organization does not offer goods and services for sale to the general public. Do we assume that organizations like [6103] do offer goods and services for sale?
Another email from Montz to Ingram and others refers to the [6103] memo and the [6103] letter while discussing organizations that are not required to file 990′s.