Who loves censorship?

[EvMetro]

Censorship thought of the day, since it pertains to this thread:

Lefties always support and defend political censorship. They would even argue with this statement in an effort to support and defend censorship.

 

[EvMetro]

Lefties are defending censorship on the threads about Google play censoring Truth Social. Naturally.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Lefties are defending censorship on the threads about Google play censoring Truth Social. Naturally.

That is because there is not a single actual liberal among them.

 

[EvMetro]

That is because there is not a single actual liberal among them.

Indeed.

 

[konradv]

Lefties are defending censorship on the threads about Google play censoring Truth Social. Naturally.

Hate speech will not be tolerated. Get used to it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Hate speech will not be tolerated. Get used to it.

Everything that disagrees with you Stalinists is hate speech in your jackbooted little world.

 

[konradv]

Everything that disagrees with you Stalinists is hate speech in your jackbooted little world.

Keep telling yourself that, as you swallow every lie that comes down the pike.

 

[EvMetro]

Hate speech will not be tolerated. Get used to it.

Thank you for validating my opening post. Here is a quote of the last paragraph of my opening post that you are validating:

"So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch."

 

[konradv]

Thank you for validating my opening post. Here is a quote of the last paragraph of my opening post that you are validating:

"So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch."

We’re condemning hate. Why are you glorifying it? It’s not like hate is constitutionally protected.

 

[EvMetro]

We’re condemning hate. Why are you glorifying it? It’s not like hate is constitutionally protected.

Spinning censorship as something altruistic is a great way to defend it! Like clockwork, you are doing exactly what I predicted lefties would do right there in the opening post.

"So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch."

 

[konradv]

Spinning censorship as something altruistic is a great way to defend it! Like clockwork, you are doing exactly what I predicted lefties would do right there in the opening post.

"So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch."

It’s not censorship, if it’s a private entity following its TOS. I don’t love censorship, but won’t use that as an excuse to enable hatemongers.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Righties want their god-given right to be a-holes, if they so desire, but also want to whine when called out on their a-holery. Can’t have it both ways. Either act like social human beings or develop a thick skin.

Mark him down for Loves Censorship

 

[iamwhatiseem]

It’s not censorship, if it’s a private entity following its TOS. I don’t love censorship, but won’t use that as an excuse to enable hatemongers.

In other words..."Blah Blah Blah... as long as it censors what I don't like it is all good... otherwise I hate it."

 

[konradv]

…”Blah Blah Blah...

Kept the part of the post that made sense. The rest sounded like a kid whining about life being unfair.

 

[EvMetro]

It’s not censorship, if it’s a private entity...

Wrong. From the opening post:

"Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

 

[EvMetro]

It’s not censorship, if it’s a private entity following its TOS.

Justifying censorship like this means you are supporting and defending it. The opening post predicted that you would do this, so your defense and support of censorship validates my opening post. Your next post will be in defense of censorship as well, watch.

 

[Moonglow]

USMB has censorship and everyone that post on here supports it

 

[konradv]

Wrong. From the opening post:

"Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

OK, it’s not censorship as defined by the Constitution. You do remember what that is, right?

 

[EvMetro]

OK, it’s not censorship as defined by the Constitution. You do remember what that is, right?

The constitution is not a dictionary. You are still attempting to defend the use of censorship, just like clockwork.

 

[EvMetro]

USMB has censorship and everyone that post on here supports it

Presenting the notion that "everyone" supports censorship is your way of supporting it. The false notion that everyone supports censorship is meant to paint a nicer picture of it.

The opening post predicted your post.