🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Who owns Hillary Clinton? Her Top 20 Donors

I admire and respect your brainwashed "opinion". Why haven't any courts or real journalists become involved?

Courts would've been involved if those who suppose to press charges are doing their jobs. You know, those who are put in place to indict criminals based on evidence, but let them go free instead even after admitting they broke the law. Those who are put in place with only one mission, to do exactly that.

Real journalists... Who exactly are you talking about?
Not RW HS grad ex cokehead DJ pundits or paid off dupe websites like Breitbart, Heritage etc etc. Actual journalists who check their stories and correct themselves when wrong. Dupes don't understand...

I asked you who do you say real journalists are, not to bitch about those who aren't.

Care to try again?
AP, Reuters, PBS, BBC etc...many newspapers not owned by Murdoch, Moons, Adelson.
 
Charity Navigator - Unrated Profile for Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation
Yeah, they removed them completely from charity navigator-
Why isn't this organization rated?

We had previously evaluated this organization, but have since determined that this charity's atypical business model can not be accurately captured in our current rating methodology. Our removal of The Clinton Foundation from our site is neither a condemnation nor an endorsement of this charity. We reserve the right to reinstate a rating for The Clinton Foundation as soon as we identify a rating methodology that appropriately captures its business model.




Right, the Foundation does its good works itself...If they were doing anything wrong, the Clintons have very high bar to get over. The RW has to make stuff up.
 
I asked you who do you say real journalists are, not to bitch about those who aren't.

Care to try again?
AP, Reuters, PBS, BBC etc...many newspapers not owned by Murdoch, Moons, Adelson.

Let's pick one of your trusted real journalists...

Reuters - State Dept. subpoenaed documents from Clinton Foundation - We know who blocked the release, do we?
Reuters - Clinton charities refile six years of tax returns to amend errors - Nothing to see here, just clerical errors, six times in a row.
Reuters - Full picture of Clinton charities' foreign government funding remains elusive - Impossible to figure out money coming in and going out because records are "inaccurate and fairly opaque".
 
BS. That's what they spend in house to help those who need it. The 13% is the overhead, dupe.
You being a liar is no surprise, since you are a libtard, but at least you could lie your lies better, jack ass.

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’
The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends
.

The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent On Charity In 2013

Clinton Charity Spends Nearly 80 Percent on Administrative Costs - Breitbart

LOL! "Administrative costs", like paying their own daughter to sit on the board.
 
This is the list of who has given absurd amounts of money to Hillary Clinton, not counting her speeches and charity foundation, and thus who owns her leash.

Keep in mind the legal limit is around $2,000, so how they donate this much is kind of damning in and of itself.

Stephen Silberstein, $800,000 - In Photos: The Top 20 Donors To Hillary Clinton's Super PAC

20. Steven Silberstein $880k
19. Thomas Tull, $1 million
18. Steven Speilberg $1 million
17. Bernard Schwarz $1 million
16. John Steven Mostyn $1 million
15. Jeffery Katzenberg $1 million
14. Barbara Lee $1.4 million
13. Pat Stryker $1.5 million
12. John Stryker $1.5 million
11. Henry and Marsha Laufer $2 million
10. Fred Eychaner $2 million
09. David E. Shaw $2.25 million
08. Herbert Sandler $2.5 million
07. Daniel Abraham $3 million
06 . Laure L. Woods $3.3 million
05. Donald Sussman $4 million
04. JB and Mary Kathyrn Pritzker $6 million
03. James Simons $7 million
02. George Soros $7 million
01. Haim and Cheryl Saban $10 million

These are the proud owners of Hillary Clinton!


The Koch Brothers are now in Hillary's corner.

I'd love to see how the progressive nuts spin this one. They've ranted on for years that they are basically the devil and republicans just do whatever they want.

Koch Brothers Now Supporting Hillary Clinton
 
It's called charity, stupid. Very scary. Nice GOP spam propaganda, for ignorant fear mongered dupes only.....
The Clinton Foundation runs around an 87% overhead cost.

That is not a charity, that is a money laundering scheme.
uhhhh, that's a LIE,SIMPLY NOT TRUE.

I'm guessing you chose to believe your right wing media propagandists without checking....?

88/89% of the money collected is used for charity at the Clinton Foundation...and for every $100 collected in donations, they spend $2 in fund raising costs....the Clinton Foundation is rated an ''A'' as a charity.

upload_2016-7-31_2-26-24.png


Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch
 
I asked you who do you say real journalists are, not to bitch about those who aren't.

Care to try again?
AP, Reuters, PBS, BBC etc...many newspapers not owned by Murdoch, Moons, Adelson.

Let's pick one of your trusted real journalists...

Reuters - State Dept. subpoenaed documents from Clinton Foundation - We know who blocked the release, do we?
Reuters - Clinton charities refile six years of tax returns to amend errors - Nothing to see here, just clerical errors, six times in a row.
Reuters - Full picture of Clinton charities' foreign government funding remains elusive - Impossible to figure out money coming in and going out because records are "inaccurate and fairly opaque".
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
This is the list of who has given absurd amounts of money to Hillary Clinton, not counting her speeches and charity foundation, and thus who owns her leash.

Keep in mind the legal limit is around $2,000, so how they donate this much is kind of damning in and of itself.

Stephen Silberstein, $800,000 - In Photos: The Top 20 Donors To Hillary Clinton's Super PAC

20. Steven Silberstein $880k
19. Thomas Tull, $1 million
18. Steven Speilberg $1 million
17. Bernard Schwarz $1 million
16. John Steven Mostyn $1 million
15. Jeffery Katzenberg $1 million
14. Barbara Lee $1.4 million
13. Pat Stryker $1.5 million
12. John Stryker $1.5 million
11. Henry and Marsha Laufer $2 million
10. Fred Eychaner $2 million
09. David E. Shaw $2.25 million
08. Herbert Sandler $2.5 million
07. Daniel Abraham $3 million
06 . Laure L. Woods $3.3 million
05. Donald Sussman $4 million
04. JB and Mary Kathyrn Pritzker $6 million
03. James Simons $7 million
02. George Soros $7 million
01. Haim and Cheryl Saban $10 million

These are the proud owners of Hillary Clinton!


The Koch Brothers are now in Hillary's corner.

I'd love to see how the progressive nuts spin this one. They've ranted on for years that they are basically the devil and republicans just do whatever they want.

Koch Brothers Now Supporting Hillary Clinton
If Bowie doesn't know money donations to Pacs are not limited....he doesn't know much. The Koch story is weird but good if true. They gave SO much money in the past...
 
This is the list of who has given absurd amounts of money to Hillary Clinton, not counting her speeches and charity foundation, and thus who owns her leash.

Keep in mind the legal limit is around $2,000, so how they donate this much is kind of damning in and of itself.

Stephen Silberstein, $800,000 - In Photos: The Top 20 Donors To Hillary Clinton's Super PAC

20. Steven Silberstein $880k
19. Thomas Tull, $1 million
18. Steven Speilberg $1 million
17. Bernard Schwarz $1 million
16. John Steven Mostyn $1 million
15. Jeffery Katzenberg $1 million
14. Barbara Lee $1.4 million
13. Pat Stryker $1.5 million
12. John Stryker $1.5 million
11. Henry and Marsha Laufer $2 million
10. Fred Eychaner $2 million
09. David E. Shaw $2.25 million
08. Herbert Sandler $2.5 million
07. Daniel Abraham $3 million
06 . Laure L. Woods $3.3 million
05. Donald Sussman $4 million
04. JB and Mary Kathyrn Pritzker $6 million
03. James Simons $7 million
02. George Soros $7 million
01. Haim and Cheryl Saban $10 million

These are the proud owners of Hillary Clinton!


The Koch Brothers are now in Hillary's corner.

I'd love to see how the progressive nuts spin this one. They've ranted on for years that they are basically the devil and republicans just do whatever they want.

Koch Brothers Now Supporting Hillary Clinton
They are not really in her corner, they haven't funded her campaign or donated to her, they just are #nevertrump people....isn't that what the article said?
 
Nobody owns Hillary like your greedy idiot GOP billionaires and brainwashers own the lying thieving New BS GOP, stupid. That's a list of patriots who want to have their own taxes raised.




Really? Soros is GOP? Dude, you're a fucking loon.... Just sayin...
 
It's called charity, stupid. Very scary. Nice GOP spam propaganda, for ignorant fear mongered dupes only.....
The Clinton Foundation runs around an 87% overhead cost.

That is not a charity, that is a money laundering scheme.
uhhhh, that's a LIE,SIMPLY NOT TRUE.

I'm guessing you chose to believe your right wing media propagandists without checking....?

88/89% of the money collected is used for charity at the Clinton Foundation...and for every $100 collected in donations, they spend $2 in fund raising costs....the Clinton Foundation is rated an ''A'' as a charity.

View attachment 83763

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

ODD that even LEFT LEANING SNOPES will not make a CALL on this.... as it was last updated in Jan. 2016!

INCORRECT ATTRIBUTION: Charles Krauthammer on Clinton
 
It's called charity, stupid. Very scary. Nice GOP spam propaganda, for ignorant fear mongered dupes only.....
The Clinton Foundation runs around an 87% overhead cost.

That is not a charity, that is a money laundering scheme.
uhhhh, that's a LIE,SIMPLY NOT TRUE.

I'm guessing you chose to believe your right wing media propagandists without checking....?

88/89% of the money collected is used for charity at the Clinton Foundation...and for every $100 collected in donations, they spend $2 in fund raising costs....the Clinton Foundation is rated an ''A'' as a charity.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Lol, yeah tell it to the Haitians who got a first hand experience for how much the Clintons actually spend on helping people vrs 'preparing' to help people.

Haitians Protest Outside Hillary Clinton’s Office Over ‘Billions Stolen’ by Clinton Foundation

Clinton Foundation HQ Protested For ‘Missing Money’ In Haiti Recovery

Haitians Protest Missing Clinton Foundation Earthquake Money

Haitians Protest Clinton Foundation Over Missing Recovery Cash

The Clinton Foundation is facing protests due to its mismanagement of resources for the post-earthquake recovery efforts of Haiti.

Five years after a disastrous earthquake ripped through the small island nation, disturbing reports of a lack of progress in the country’s recovery have angered many Haitian Americans.

The country is still in ruin. Only 900 homes have been built in the last five years even though over $10 billion was donated from the international community to help rebuild Haiti.

The Clinton Foundation, which led fundraising efforts for the recovery, has been the focus of many protests.

One protester from Harlem said, “These people – they are still living in very difficult conditions, living in tents, while Bill Clinton and his cronies are wasting this money.



The Clintons use their money for trips, double average salaries, etc to claim that these are costs of giving the charity, and many, like the article you gave us, only look at costs of a much narrower sort in calculating overhead. The Haitians experience says it all.

A federal audit came up with this.

Clintons Pushed Most Wasteful of U.S.-Funded Haiti Projects - Judicial Watch

Not really, according to a federal audit of the $1.14 billion that Congress approved to help Haiti recover from the powerful earthquake that killed more than 200,000 and left over 1 million homeless. The probe was requested by a Florida congresswoman who chairs the House Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee because hundreds of millions have been spent in Haiti with virtually no accountability.

The investigation focused on $651 million that American taxpayers have given Haiti via the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) since 2010. The probe “reveals a troubling lack of progress and accountability,” according to the lawmaker who ordered it, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. “More than three years after the devastating earthquake of January 12, 2010, we find that much of the assistance that the U.S. has provided Haiti for reconstruction efforts has suffered from ineffective stewardship on the part of USAID,” the veteran congresswoman says in a statement posted on her website.

The Clinton-backed power and port venture is the biggest and most expensive failure mentioned in the report. An astounding $170.3 million later, it is years behind schedule, lacks a qualified engineer and has unrealistic timeframes. As a result, planning has been hindered, the report says, and “funding will be insufficient to cover a majority of projected costs.” It will take an additional $117 to $189 million to complete it and it’s unclear whether the Haitian government will be able to find a private sector company willing to finance the remainder of the project.

That means Uncle Sam must come to the rescue or the $170.3 million already wasted on the project will be lost. Either way, U.S. taxpayers get screwed. Besides the scandalous, Clinton-backed power and port experiment, congressional investigators found mismanagement of a crucial housing plan that was supposed to accommodate up to 90,000 Haitians. USAID claims it will only be able to handle 3,200 to 15,900 people at nearly double the original cost of $59 million. That means the cost per house is nearly triple the original estimate, according to the report.

Back to the Clinton prominence in all things Haiti; the United Nations named the former commander-in-chief as a special envoy to the island and his Clinton Foundation has raised $34 million for Haiti since the catastrophic earthquake hit. Additionally, the former president has distributed $54.4 million from the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, which was launched shortly after the earthquake. The fund closed in December after distributing the last of the money and claims that it has “helped Haitians create a better future through smart, sustainable economic development” though it acknowledges that “much work remains to be done in Haiti.”

This is classic Democrat/Union/Mafia siphoning of funds into private pockets, and all disguised as expenses of various kinds.

They hide these rake offs as over-priced expenses, like their $50 million in travel expenses. Bill Clinton foundation has spent more than $50M on travel expenses

And despite the glare of public scrutiny, the Clintons still go on their merry way, ignoring the plight of Haitians still living in abject poverty, despite the measely nine hundred homes built with billions of dollars in aid. Clinton Foundation Financial Disclosures Still a Shambles, Despite Hillary Clinton Oversight - Breitbart

Now libtard sites that are doing CYA for the Clintons claim that things like travel expenses are part of their charitable spending, but that is horse shit. IF the Red Cross spends 80% of its intake on travel expenses, salaries, and other costs that are not providing help to individual people in need, then those expenses are considered 'over head' despite what the Clintonista claims maybe be otherwise.
 
It's called charity, stupid. Very scary. Nice GOP spam propaganda, for ignorant fear mongered dupes only.....

It's called "pay to play". I give couple of millions to your slush fund, and you get me uranium deal, or Haiti housing contract, or Colombian lumber contract, or Keystone XL vote... and not to be suspicious, you'll give few speeches, just for show.

Charity that spends less then 50% on programs is not charity. And Clinton Foundation spends less then 10%.
10%? You`re badly misinformed or you enjoy lying. Try 89%. Google can be your friend if you allow it to do so.
Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?
 
Charity that spends less then 50% on programs is not charity. And Clinton Foundation spends less then 10%.
10%? You`re badly misinformed or you enjoy lying. Try 89%. Google can be your friend if you allow it to do so.
Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?
Bullshit, that site is doing CYA for the Clintons and they arrive at their ridiculous percentage by counting as charity all the CF travel expenses for their organizers, their salaries, etc, what most people would consider "overhead", i.e. anything that is not giving money or aid to needy people itself.

You Democrats are such lying fucks it is mind boggling.
 
Charity that spends less then 50% on programs is not charity. And Clinton Foundation spends less then 10%.
10%? You`re badly misinformed or you enjoy lying. Try 89%. Google can be your friend if you allow it to do so.
Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?
Bullshit, that site is doing CYA for the Clintons and they arrive at their ridiculous percentage by counting as charity all the CF travel expenses for their organizers, their salaries, etc, what most people would consider "overhead", i.e. anything that is not giving money or aid to needy people itself.

You Democrats are such lying fucks it is mind boggling.
You caught me. The actual percentage going to charity is only 88% not 89%.
Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch
 
This is the list of who has given absurd amounts of money to Hillary Clinton, not counting her speeches and charity foundation, and thus who owns her leash.

Keep in mind the legal limit is around $2,000, so how they donate this much is kind of damning in and of itself.

Stephen Silberstein, $800,000 - In Photos: The Top 20 Donors To Hillary Clinton's Super PAC

20. Steven Silberstein $880k
19. Thomas Tull, $1 million
18. Steven Speilberg $1 million
17. Bernard Schwarz $1 million
16. John Steven Mostyn $1 million
15. Jeffery Katzenberg $1 million
14. Barbara Lee $1.4 million
13. Pat Stryker $1.5 million
12. John Stryker $1.5 million
11. Henry and Marsha Laufer $2 million
10. Fred Eychaner $2 million
09. David E. Shaw $2.25 million
08. Herbert Sandler $2.5 million
07. Daniel Abraham $3 million
06 . Laure L. Woods $3.3 million
05. Donald Sussman $4 million
04. JB and Mary Kathyrn Pritzker $6 million
03. James Simons $7 million
02. George Soros $7 million
01. Haim and Cheryl Saban $10 million

These are the proud owners of Hillary Clinton!
How do you vote for Republicans when they have all the same donors and then some?
 

Forum List

Back
Top