boedicca
Uppity Water Nymph from the Land of Funk
- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,439
- 24,108
- 2,290
The essence of what you are doing is advocating suppression of free speech because somebody somewhere might take offense.
It's intentions like yours which lead to the destruction of individual liberty.
The principle of individual liberty does not protect threatening or intimidating speech.
Actually, it does in the vast majority of cases. The Constitution does not give the government the power to make expressing ideas crimes. Most "threats" and "intimidations" are rhetorical and no rational person would take them at face value.
Last edited: