Whose Up For A Public Double-Execution?

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,150
2,645
ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted
CHASED TO 'ENDS OF THE EARTH'

ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted

Since ISIS loves public executions so much, once convicted, whose up for putting these 2 animals to death on World-Wide TV?



 
You never know how a live execution is going to come off, so I don't think so. Things can go wrong, you might not get the reaction you are hoping for.

Maybe it might be better to have a staged event, where the condemned appear to renounce Islamonazism- but instead of the actual terrorists, get actors in there.
 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.
 
ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted
CHASED TO 'ENDS OF THE EARTH'

ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted

Since ISIS loves public executions so much, once convicted, whose up for putting these 2 animals to death on World-Wide TV?



Sometimes an eye for an eye is justice.
 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.
The beheading of American aid workers gives America "jurisdiction" .
Let someone from ISIS come here and explain how they have a right to come here on the behalf of inhuman
butchers and intervene.

Your post sets a new low water standard by which future idiotic, gibberish filled posts will be judged.
It is actually funny someone would post it.
 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.
Didn’t take long for another blame America first democrat to come along and crap on the thread.

There is a basic legal principle of self defense when the US sends military forces into innocent counties like Iraq.
And all those millions of Sunni in Iraq that we illegally made jobless and homeless have more than adequate right to be angry with us.

Nothing to do with partisanship.
It is just that wars, imperialism, colonialism, etc., are wrong and illegal.
So then the US has no legal standing in this case.
We can't apply US laws that we already violated by murdering innocent Iraqis.
 
ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted
CHASED TO 'ENDS OF THE EARTH'

ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted

Since ISIS loves public executions so much, once convicted, whose up for putting these 2 animals to death on World-Wide TV?



Bring back the Guillotine.
 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.

You're a muzzie? Or just a proponent?

Moslems follow the same Old Testament.
You can't be a Jew or Christian without also defending Moslems.
They are essentially the same except for a few minor details.
 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.
The beheading of American aid workers gives America "jurisdiction" .
Let someone from ISIS come here and explain how they have a right to come here on the behalf of inhuman
butchers and intervene.

Your post sets a new low water standard by which future idiotic, gibberish filled posts will be judged.
It is actually funny someone would post it.

No, the US does not get jurisdiction based on the citizenship of a person involved.
The US aid worker should not have been in the Mideast.
They did not have legal permission from the natives to be there.

And certainly US courts have ZERO jurisdiction.
You would have to use local laws.
And the closest you could come would be to have a trial in Iraq, or a trial by World Court.
US courts using US laws, would violate US law.
 
ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted
CHASED TO 'ENDS OF THE EARTH'

ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted

Since ISIS loves public executions so much, once convicted, whose up for putting these 2 animals to death on World-Wide TV?



Bring back the Guillotine.

Actually, the guillotine likely is the least painful, quickest, and most humane of all means of execution.
The worst likely is the electric chair that US used for over 50 years.
 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.

You're a muzzie? Or just a proponent?

Moslems follow the same Old Testament.
You can't be a Jew or Christian without also defending Moslems.
They are essentially the same except for a few minor details.
How do you feel about the pedophilia of your prophet?
 
Actually, the guillotine likely is the least painful, quickest, and most humane of all means of execution.
The worst likely is the electric chair that US used for over 50 years.
Screw 'humane'.
 
ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted
CHASED TO 'ENDS OF THE EARTH'

ISIS monsters linked to beheadings of American aid workers and journalists brought to US and indicted

Since ISIS loves public executions so much, once convicted, whose up for putting these 2 animals to death on World-Wide TV?



Bring back the Guillotine.

Actually, the guillotine likely is the least painful, quickest, and most humane of all means of execution.
The worst likely is the electric chair that US used for over 50 years.
Worse than being quartered? Anyway, the last person executed by a Guillotine was a Muzzie:

 
US law has no jurisdiction on events over seas, and ISIS actually does have local jurisdiction since the US illegally turned the Mideast into a war zone.
Didn’t take long for another blame America first democrat to come along and crap on the thread.

There is a basic legal principle of self defense when the US sends military forces into innocent counties like Iraq.
And all those millions of Sunni in Iraq that we illegally made jobless and homeless have more than adequate right to be angry with us.

Nothing to do with partisanship.
It is just that wars, imperialism, colonialism, etc., are wrong and illegal.
So then the US has no legal standing in this case.
We can't apply US laws that we already violated by murdering innocent Iraqis.
Yada yada yada...
And there was no Cold War and no such thing as muslim terrorism, etc.
 

Forum List

Back
Top