Flaylo
Handsome Devil
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Why not just eliminate marriage from the law entirely and call them all civil unions.
Gays aren't happy unless they are flouting their perversions and pressing to have them accepted as the norm. They are a snippy, agressive lot more self-righteous than fundametalist preachers.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Arent couples in Civil Unions hit with gigantic estate taxes when the other dies (as opposed to 0% if you're married)? They arent equal, so unless youre out there in Washington trying to amend some aspects you should probably just quit worrying about the whole thing and get on with your own business.
You dont have to like gay marriage, you dont have to support it, you dont have to teach your kids that its an OK option thats your prerogative. But when it comes to the lives of other people, why do you have to stick your nose in their business?
,
Gays aren't happy unless they are flouting their perversions and pressing to have them accepted as the norm. They are a snippy, agressive lot more self-righteous than fundametalist preachers.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Arent couples in Civil Unions hit with gigantic estate taxes when the other dies (as opposed to 0% if you're married)? They arent equal, so unless youre out there in Washington trying to amend some aspects you should probably just quit worrying about the whole thing and get on with your own business.
You dont have to like gay marriage, you dont have to support it, you dont have to teach your kids that its an OK option thats your prerogative. But when it comes to the lives of other people, why do you have to stick your nose in their business?
,
Gays are grasping little things, too. The bottom line is that they are after government benefits designed to protect women and children,
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Aren’t couples in Civil Unions hit with gigantic estate taxes when the other dies (as opposed to 0% if you're married)? They aren’t equal, so unless you’re out there in Washington trying to amend “some aspects” you should probably just quit worrying about the whole thing and get on with your own business.
You don’t have to like gay marriage, you don’t have to support it, you don’t have to teach your kids that it’s an OK option – that’s your prerogative. But when it comes to the lives of other people, why do you have to stick your nose in their business?
,
Gays are grasping little things, too. The bottom line is that they are after government benefits designed to protect women and children,
Gays aren't happy unless they are flouting their perversions and pressing to have them accepted as the norm. They are a snippy, agressive lot more self-righteous than fundametalist preachers.
Where did you park your time machine? I'm sure you're sorely missed in the 1930's.
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Why not just eliminate marriage from the law entirely and call them all civil unions.
Of course gay marriage won't affect heterosexual marriages.
Who would even think such a thing?
I'm tired of all this civil union's ain't good enough and semantical bullshit, they can amend some aspects of civil unions to give equal legl rights to gays but leave marriage alone.
Well, the DOMA kind of prevents that. I agree that the answer to the problem is to let straights keep the "marriage" name and give "Civil Unions" every right and privilege legally, that married couples have.
Gays aren't happy unless they are flouting their perversions and pressing to have them accepted as the norm. They are a snippy, agressive lot more self-righteous than fundametalist preachers.
Gays just want the law to recognize their unions in the same way the law recognizes straight unions.
They are not trying to become the "norm", and they are not trying to force you out of your own personal heterosexual relationship.
Why do you care so much about what gay people do in the privacy of their own home?
.
Why can't negroes who want to marry white women accept civil unions and just be done with it? Marriage is reserved for two people of the same race!