- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,032
- 37,882
Worst they can do is fire him
Yeah, it is likely they broke an employment agreement, but not any laws
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Worst they can do is fire him
Its been like 2 months, how the fuck is it the Biden DOJ cannot identify one out of like 30 possible people?
Are they inept or corrupt?
Whoever leaked the decision broke the law, and should be punished, no different than Snowden, Manning, or Assange.
Read it again, no mention of any law. Stupid response.
Because one of the liberal justices is responsible for the leak....
Did we ever learn the identity of Schiff's whistleblower?
I don’t think the DoJ is doing the investigation at all. Isn’t strictly internal?Its been like 2 months, how the fuck is it the Biden DOJ cannot identify one out of like 30 possible people?
Are they inept or corrupt?
Whoever leaked the decision broke the law, and should be punished, no different than Snowden, Manning, or Assange.
It has to be a crime for DOJ to investigateI don’t think the DoJ is doing the investigation at all. Isn’t strictly internal?
I don’t think the DoJ is doing the investigation at all. Isn’t strictly internal?
My theory is that it was the chief justice that leaked it. Remember, it was the chief justice who confirmed it was authentic.Its been like 2 months, how the fuck is it the Biden DOJ cannot identify one out of like 30 possible people?
Are they inept or corrupt?
Whoever leaked the decision broke the law, and should be punished, no different than Snowden, Manning, or Assange.
Which law specifically was broken?
It's not illegal, but the person who did it would surely be fired, and his law career will be destroyed.
The democrat Waffen SS, the DOJ, protects their fellow travelersIts been like 2 months, how the fuck is it the Biden DOJ cannot identify one out of like 30 possible people?
Are they inept or corrupt?
Whoever leaked the decision broke the law, and should be punished, no different than Snowden, Manning, or Assange.
Take a nap Frank. No laws were broken, so it's the job of the inspector general, but the courts don't have an inspector general.The democrat Waffen SS, the DOJ, protects their fellow travelers
Why don't the whistle-blowers come forward
I hope not, because that would directly implicate Clarence Thomas for leaving it laying around, presuming he brought it home, and she didn't swipe it from his desk at work.I hear it was Ginny Thomas
She didn't leak it, nimrod.I hope not, because that would directly implicate Clarence Thomas for leaving it laying around, presuming he brought it home, and she didn't swipe it from his desk at work.
And how would you know?She didn't leak it, nimrod.
Because that would inevitably lead to her divorce.And how would you know?
Did you "ASS" tell you that?
Neither Thomas can afford to lose the other one. It's why the Clintons are still together, no matter what the other one does.Because that would inevitably lead to her divorce.
When a couple has been married that long, divorce would be a catastrophe. But something like leaking the decision might be enough to push them over the edge.Neither Thomas can afford to lose the other one. It's why the Clintons are still together, no matter what the other one does.
Its been like 2 months, how the fuck is it the Biden DOJ cannot identify one out of like 30 possible people?
Are they inept or corrupt?
Whoever leaked the decision broke the law, and should be punished, no different than Snowden, Manning, or Assange.