Why is Obama such a lousy Communist?

Dorkazoid_Jones

Active Member
Jan 21, 2009
267
54
28
DC
Actually Obama is a GREAT Communist!!

Here is the definition of Communism:

"A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."

Let's look at the first part of the defiintion, "the state plans and controls the economy." Obama basically wants to decide which companies are good and which are bad. If it was up to him, he would wipe out all the oil companies so he could have Solyndra, or windmills. That sounds like a communist to me. Or how about this quote, "You didn't build that." Really?? Doesn't that sound like a communist?? Who did build it -- the government thru their generosity of letting business people actually have businesses??

Here's another part of the definition of communism: "All goods are equally shared by the people." Hmmm let's see. The rich already pay the lion's share of taxes, and that's still not enough for Obama. They need to pay their fair share. If Obama were a capitalist, then fair share would actually mean the wealthy would pay LOWER rates, but instead he's doing just the opposite. Why would he do that? Because he's not interested in equality of opportunity, he's interested in equality of results thru equal money. That is clearly the thinking of a Communist.

As an aside, Communism is an idealogy of inequality rather than equality because it assumes that only money is what makes people equal. As we all know, some people are born better looking, or better atheletes, or smarter. So by making everyone have the same wealth, means that your genetic luck at birth is more important than hard work and being a producer. basically, in Obama's communist world, there is no cause and effect which is both an anarchistic point of view but also a communist point of view because communists don't believe in merit. In short, Communism is an immoral movement that shoves inequality and the luck of birth down everyone's throats. And then liberals can't figure out why things like the Tea Party spring up...

Now this isn't officially part of the definition but it's cleary a trait of communism -- rigging elections and destroying democracy. Obama wants open borders so he create the largest voter nullification in history by bringing in millions of third world left wingers who nullify citizens Republican (read that as capitalists) votes.

What's really interesting about the hypocrisy by Democrats is that if you disagree with Obama you're a racist. That's really hard to prove and is false for most people. However, I just laid out how Obama is a communist with examples. Hard to understand then, how liberals get incensed when you label an exemplar of communism a communist, but have no problem labelling everyone a racist with flimsy or no evidence....
 
Last edited:
Our infrastructure is falling apart
Our science programs are being cut
Our ability to compete as a nation is falling against the rest of the first world

None of the parties be it democrat or republican can do anything sane.
 
Actually Obama is a GREAT Communist!!

Here is the definition of Communism:

"A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."

Let's look at the first part of the defiintion, "the state plans and controls the economy." Obama basically wants to decide which companies are good and which are bad. If it was up to him, he would wipe out all the oil companies so he could have Solyndra, or windmills. That sounds like a communist to me. Or how about this quote, "You didn't build that." Really?? Doesn't that sound like a communist?? Who did build it -- the government thru their generosity of letting business people actually have businesses??

Here's another part of the definition of communism: "All goods are equally shared by the people." Hmmm let's see. The rich already pay the lion's share of taxes, and that's still not enough for Obama. They need to pay their fair share. If Obama were a capitalist, then fair share would actually mean the wealthy would pay LOWER rates, but instead he's doing just the opposite. Why would he do that? Because he's not interested in equality of opportunity, he's interested in equality of results thru equal money. That is clearly the thinking of a Communist.

As an aside, Communism is an idealogy of inequality rather than equality because it assumes that only money is what makes people equal. As we all know, some people are born better looking, or better atheletes, or smarter. So by making everyone have the same wealth, means that your genetic luck at birth is more important than hard work and being a producer. basically, in Obama's communist world, there is no cause and effect which is both an anarchistic point of view but also a communist point of view because communists don't believe in merit. In short, Communism is an immoral movement that shoves inequality and the luck of birth down everyone's throats. And then liberals can't figure out why things like the Tea Party spring up...

Now this isn't officially part of the definition but it's cleary a trait of communism -- rigging elections and destroying democracy. Obama wants open borders so he create the largest voter nullification in history by bringing in millions of third world left wingers who nullify citizens Republican (read that as capitalists) votes.

What's really interesting about the hypocrisy by Democrats is that if you disagree with Obama you're a racist. That's really hard to prove and is false for most people. However, I just laid out how Obama is a communist with examples. Hard to understand then, how liberals get incensed when you label an exemplar of communism a communist, but have no problem labelling everyone a racist with flimsy or no evidence....

Thank you for being ridiculous; it takes a real fool to spend so much time and effort to risk being sent packing by the Ministry of Truth. You've done wonderful job and deserve being sent packing by those on the right, the left and in the middle.
 
Jeeez.

Another idiot who doesn't know the definition of "Communist".

Oh well, knock yourself out.
 
Jeeez.

Another idiot who doesn't know the definition of "Communist".

Oh well, knock yourself out.

I took the definition of communism from the dictionary. Please tell us what YOUR definition of Communism is. Sorry if Obama lines up so well with a typical definition of Communism.
 
Actually Obama is a GREAT Communist!!

Here is the definition of Communism:

"A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people."

Let's look at the first part of the defiintion, "the state plans and controls the economy." Obama basically wants to decide which companies are good and which are bad. If it was up to him, he would wipe out all the oil companies so he could have Solyndra, or windmills. That sounds like a communist to me. Or how about this quote, "You didn't build that." Really?? Doesn't that sound like a communist?? Who did build it -- the government thru their generosity of letting business people actually have businesses??

Here's another part of the definition of communism: "All goods are equally shared by the people." Hmmm let's see. The rich already pay the lion's share of taxes, and that's still not enough for Obama. They need to pay their fair share. If Obama were a capitalist, then fair share would actually mean the wealthy would pay LOWER rates, but instead he's doing just the opposite. Why would he do that? Because he's not interested in equality of opportunity, he's interested in equality of results thru equal money. That is clearly the thinking of a Communist.

As an aside, Communism is an idealogy of inequality rather than equality because it assumes that only money is what makes people equal. As we all know, some people are born better looking, or better atheletes, or smarter. So by making everyone have the same wealth, means that your genetic luck at birth is more important than hard work and being a producer. basically, in Obama's communist world, there is no cause and effect which is both an anarchistic point of view but also a communist point of view because communists don't believe in merit. In short, Communism is an immoral movement that shoves inequality and the luck of birth down everyone's throats. And then liberals can't figure out why things like the Tea Party spring up...

Now this isn't officially part of the definition but it's cleary a trait of communism -- rigging elections and destroying democracy. Obama wants open borders so he create the largest voter nullification in history by bringing in millions of third world left wingers who nullify citizens Republican (read that as capitalists) votes.

What's really interesting about the hypocrisy by Democrats is that if you disagree with Obama you're a racist. That's really hard to prove and is false for most people. However, I just laid out how Obama is a communist with examples. Hard to understand then, how liberals get incensed when you label an exemplar of communism a communist, but have no problem labelling everyone a racist with flimsy or no evidence....

Thank you for being ridiculous; it takes a real fool to spend so much time and effort to risk being sent packing by the Ministry of Truth. You've done wonderful job and deserve being sent packing by those on the right, the left and in the middle.

And you're definition of Communism is_________________________
 
Last edited:
Actually, Obama would be more of a socialist; not a commie.

Reason being that actual communism is the stage that comes after socialism, in which the state no longer exists. Also, true communists believe in a "classless society." Something that Barry O and his crew seem to be against, as they've been further igniting class-warfare mentality since he took the stage.

So that leaves very little room for him to be a communist. A socialist yes, but a communist? Far from it.
 
Dorkozoid::

I've got no beef with your definition of Communism and you can TRY to apply to it to the Dear Leader..

But -- he's a product of the Leftist philosophies of 60s, not mainstream Socialist or Communist. Those folks have PRINCIPLES. Principles that they won't compromise. I've had some of deepest and most meaningful political discussions acknowledged Socialists on forums and I respect them..

I have NO respect for the cancerous tumors of socialist philosophy that are the Leftists.
These folks only crave power. Power to be used to further their views of how the less talented should live. They have high opinions of their own abilities and morals and very low opinions of everyone elses.

Bloomberg is a leftist. 1/2 the Dem part are Leftists. And they will use ANY power that they previously abhorred once they obtain office. Their morals are grey and situational. And their desire to micromanage and control is overwhelming.
 
Jeeez.

Another idiot who doesn't know the definition of "Communist".

Oh well, knock yourself out.

I took the definition of communism from the dictionary. Please tell us what YOUR definition of Communism is. Sorry if Obama lines up so well with a typical definition of Communism.

He's more of a socialist, but in order for him to make it more palatable for the masses, he has to engage in Communism-Lite.
 

Forum List

Back
Top