Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science

[Vigilante]

But still ignorant and paranoid enough to worry about communist conspiracies

MY GOD, does this NOT DESCRIBE the Manchurian muslim EXACTLY...and said by a COMMUNIST 2 years before the cock sucker in the White House was born...NICKY was a better SEER OF THE FUTURE than Carnac!

Better than Carnac? Now THAT is quite the commendation.

And Carnac HAD the answers....

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

 

[Vigilante]

Green is the new RED..it's all about controlling people!

[IMG//toiletpaper://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/c7/30.jpg[/IMSTUPID]

And there's the denier cult troll paranoid-crackpot-conspiracy-theory propaganda meme #2.

...(shudder)..."It's all a 'YUGE' commie conspiracy".....(oh, the horror)...

Suitable for terrifying extremely gullible, very brainwashed, completely ignorant, and virulently anti-science, anti-regulatory rightwingnuts into a panic! Or, in other words, most of them.

Watch them run in circles, waving their arms, and praising the virtues of The Almighty Dollar and Unrestrained Free Market Capitalism like true devotees of their cult....so that their corporate puppetmasters can continue to make high profits selling the stuff that is killing our only planet.

 

[ScienceRocks]

No one gives a fuck about your hatred of science mr.idiot. Keep on thinking your fifth grade education makes you capable of debating a issue that is settled by phd's.

 

[Crick]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

 

[Old Rocks]

It's actually really simple. These so called "scientists" have been wrong over and over

Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

• Get PDF (2.6 MB. Document is scanned, no OCR.)
• Go to journal webpage

And?

 

[Vigilante]

Dark Money Corruption of Democracy Forces Climate Change Direct ...
www.truth-out.org/.../26105-dark-money-corruption-of-democracy-forces-c...
Truthout
Sep 10, 2014 - Seventeen critical years after the Kyoto Protocol signing, climate activists have come to realize that when our governments are bought and sold, ..

 

[Vigilante]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

Some scientist blame SUN SPOTS!

 

[ScienceRocks]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

Some scientist blame SUN SPOTS!

Do realize that 90% of the warming these past 50 years has been from co2. One could of course argue that solar had a more equal footing before 1950, but since that time it has grown smaller.

 

[Vigilante]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

Some scientist blame SUN SPOTS!

Do realize that 90% of the warming these past 50 years has been from co2. One could of course argue that solar had a more equal footing before 1950, but since that time it has grown smaller.

MORE FOOD FOR THE PEOPLE OF EARTH!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Wrong.

RELIGION:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:
the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices:
a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.:
to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.
religions, Archaic. religious rites:
painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
**************************************************************

Climate science does not involve any supernatural or superhuman entities or processes. It does not involve the cause, nature or purpose of the universe. It's holdings are all the products of evidence, reason and the application of known scientific principles, not unsupported faith. The denier practice of calling it religion is nothing more than a weak and ineffective debating technique.

Yes you just described the AGW religion as well as the far left religion..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

kosh is a cult member of the far right hate America crowd.

 

[Crick]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

Some scientist blame SUN SPOTS!

Some scientists blame sun spots for what?

And still waiting to hear what you believe to be the significance of higher CO2 levels in the distant past.

 

[Crick]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

Some scientist blame SUN SPOTS!

Do realize that 90% of the warming these past 50 years has been from co2. One could of course argue that solar had a more equal footing before 1950, but since that time it has grown smaller.

MORE FOOD FOR THE PEOPLE OF EARTH!

450 ppm, sea level +5 cm

1270 ppm, sea level +500 cm*

* - off the top of my head

 

[Vigilante]

CO2 has been higher in the past
www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-has-been-higher-in-the-past.html
Skeptical Science
Oct 27, 2009 - When the sun is less active, the CO2-ice threshold is much higher. ... So we see that comparisons of present day climate to periods 500 ... CO2 levels were as high as today was around 15 million years ago, during the Middle Miocene. ...... post-dates the onset of the extinction by several 100,000's of years, .

No one is arguing with you that they were not. But what significance do you see there? For starters, why don't you look up how LONG they took to achieve the levels they reached back then.

Some scientist blame SUN SPOTS!

Some scientists blame sun spots for what?

And still waiting to hear what you believe to be the significance of higher CO2 levels in the distant past.

I just posted a video where PLANT LIFE was significantly increased, do you EAT salad?

 

[Old Rocks]

Green is the new RED..it's all about controlling people!

Whee. Another first class dingbat. Why don't you tell that to all the Alpine glaciers that are rapidly receding? To the rapidly diminishing Arctic Ocean Ice? Are them thar pointy headed Commie Libruls out there with blowtorches?

 

[Muhammed]

Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science



He makes some good points. What do you think?

Wow, that dude is an extremely brainwashed doomsday cult member.

His body language, panicked tone of voice and desperation are all very typical of doomsday cult members.

 

[Crick]

Body language? Is that one of the many scientific subjects your 158 IQ has allowed you to master?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's actually really simple. These so called "scientists" have been wrong over and over

Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

• Get PDF (2.6 MB. Document is scanned, no OCR.)
• Go to journal webpage

And?

And....

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science



He makes some good points. What do you think?

Lets see we have a laundry list of supposed scientists that have ADMITTED they lied about climate science and climate change and justified it by saying they need to scare us into believing it. We have 30 years of temperature recordings that keep getting "adjusted" to suit the latest claim by the "scientific Community" we have a thousand years of information that gets ignored glossed over or outright lied about in regard weather by these same scientists. We have 20 years of failed predictions that have been so badly wrong as to be pitiful followed by MORE outrageous claims to come. We have theories that NOT ONE SINGLE scientist claiming them has conducted a successful experiment with that can be reproduced. We have Scientists claiming all kind of outrageous things and then REFUSING to release their supposed data.

Lie to me enough and guess what? I won't believe you when you tell me that water is wet.

 

[Crick]

Lets see we have a laundry list of supposed scientists that have ADMITTED they lied about climate science and climate change and justified it by saying they need to scare us into believing it.

No, you do not.

We have 30 years of temperature recordings that keep getting "adjusted" to suit the latest claim by the "scientific Community"

Temperature records have been getting adjusted since the day they were taken. What you do NOT have is any evidence that those adjustments are intended to do ANYTHING besides make them more accurate.

we have a thousand years of information that gets ignored glossed over or outright lied about in regard weather by these same scientists.

No one is ignoring the past. It just doesn't mean what you think it does. Rising temperatures causing CO2 levels to increase, for instance, does not preclude rising CO2 levels from raising Earth's temperatures. Because certain conditions existed on Earth before the development of human culture, does not mean it is normal, acceptable or harmless for those conditions to return to day. And, finally, conditions that developed over a million years will not have the same effect as those same conditions developing over a century and a half.

We have 20 years of failed predictions that have been so badly wrong as to be pitiful

The lie you've been told in this case, is that the models have failed.

followed by MORE outrageous claims to come. We have theories that NOT ONE SINGLE scientist claiming them has conducted a successful experiment with that can be reproduced.

It is difficult to fit a planet into your lab, particularly when you are standing on said planet. But an enormous amount of experimentation HAS been done. Please read "The Physical Science Basis" from Working Group I of the IPCC in AR5. It may be found at www.ipcc.ch

We have Scientists claiming all kind of outrageous things and then REFUSING to release their supposed data.

ENORMOUS amounts of data are available to the public at large. No one who is actually attempting to find out what is happening (vice pushing the fossil fuel disinformation campaign) is unhappy about the data available to them.

Lie to me enough and guess what? I won't believe you when you tell me that water is wet.

Then you really need to figure out who it is that's lying to you Gunny, because it is NOT mainstream science. Rather, it is individuals in the industry whose very existence (and thus whose very comfortable salaries) are threatened by the knowledge that the CO2 emissions their products produce threaten the well being of the entire planet.

 

[Old Rocks]

It's actually really simple. These so called "scientists" have been wrong over and over

Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.

• Get PDF (2.6 MB. Document is scanned, no OCR.)
• Go to journal webpage

And?

And....

Well Don't, you have been suckered. That is a fake. Completely and totally.

Sorry, a TIME Magazine Cover Did Not Predict a Coming Ice Age | TIME.com