Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,091
2,250
Sin City
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
 
I feel as though I'm in some sort of protected class of femininity that is total Bull Shit! Are our boys and young men (in particular) to be so bridled through trepidation that they do not assert themselves in this world that is no longer just Male and Female, but also LGBTQ... ! What will become of the presumption of innocence until proven guilty - 'due process'? Does this presumption now only apply to Non heterosexual males?
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.
 
Soros's democrat Party is telling us that they have no interest in living in a country they don't rule. At this point, it might be best to relocate them to Venezuela.
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
 
Soros's democrat Party is telling us that they have no interest in living in a country they don't rule. At this point, it might be best to relocate them to Venezuela.


Trebuchet.jpg
 
It was and is one big smear.

Hope they realize what goes around. Does come around.
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
What backpedaling? You kids are making shit it to try to dismiss serious crimes as a "smear".
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
What backpedaling? You kids are making shit it to try to dismiss serious crimes as a "smear".

They are serious crimes when you have proof, witnesses or both.

There were no witnesses and no proof. It was he said. She said.

The two witnesses she provided said they weren't at that party.

Oh and don't say the Dems didn't use this to smear BK. That would be an outright lie.
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
What backpedaling? You kids are making shit it to try to dismiss serious crimes as a "smear".

They are serious crimes when you have proof, witnesses or both.

There were no witnesses and no proof. It was he said. She said.

The two witnesses she provided said they weren't at that party.

Oh and don't say the Dems didn't use this to smear BK. That would be an outright lie.
First, I don't lie. That's a conservative game.

Second, nobody is smearing anyone.

Third, we all watched Bart O'Kavanaugh lie under oath just last week.
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
What backpedaling? You kids are making shit it to try to dismiss serious crimes as a "smear".

They are serious crimes when you have proof, witnesses or both.

There were no witnesses and no proof. It was he said. She said.

The two witnesses she provided said they weren't at that party.

Oh and don't say the Dems didn't use this to smear BK. That would be an outright lie.
First, I don't lie. That's a conservative game.

Second, nobody is smearing anyone.

Third, we all watched Bart O'Kavanaugh lie under oath just last week.

Looks like a smear to me.
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
What backpedaling? You kids are making shit it to try to dismiss serious crimes as a "smear".

It's a smear if it's just an allegation that's not supported by anything. No independent assertion she put forth has been corroborated. No location, only a vague idea of date and time, no one she named as being present agrees they were, etc. IOW, you have to stretch credulity to give her story enough weight to justify using it to destroy a man's life.

And, if it's not a smear attempt, why are idiots calling him a rapist when he's not even accused of that?
 
It took all the way to the end of this opinion piece to get down to the bottom line.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

More @ Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?
It's not s smear.

If we Democrats we're gonna smear anyone it would have been gorsuch, whom we have far more reason to resent.

You kids need to use yer heads for something besides holding your hats up.

It's too late for back peddling. Right or wrong, a democrat pick in the future will face this kind of personal destruction. Republicans will overcome their natural tendency to play fair and pull out the long knives.
What backpedaling? You kids are making shit it to try to dismiss serious crimes as a "smear".

It's a smear if it's just an allegation that's not supported by anything. No independent assertion she put forth has been corroborated. No location, only a vague idea of date and time, no one she named as being present agrees they were, etc. IOW, you have to stretch credulity to give her story enough weight to justify using it to destroy a man's life.

They don't care about destroying his life.

There is no proof of any wrong doing whatsoever.

All anyone had to do was listen to Ford to see the whole thing was a crock of shit.

They don't care. They just don't want a conservative on the SC. They want liberals who throw the Constitution right out the window.
 

Forum List

Back
Top