Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
Pathetic, ignorant brainwashed functional morons. Change the channel. You are deplorable. See sig, last line.Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
It certainly destroyed the spin that she is this elite politician, making a huge mistake like that was an amateur move. The woman has failed in most every role she's had so I for one am not surprised.
I agree... she just needs to go off and be a grandma!I don't hate Hillary, she's just not fit to be an American President or hold any political office at all
P.S. I would love to see a woman become president. But I want someone more like Margret Thatcher than Hillary Clinton.
Actual facts You wouldn't understand. lol. You dupes can't even look at non bs propaganda. Hilarious.Huffy puffy really? A lot of talk for a retard like you.Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post
When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.
When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.
When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:
I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.
... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.
Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”
Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.
It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.
Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.
And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.
Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.
Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.
Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?
In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.
Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.
And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.
It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.
Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.
What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?
Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.
We deserve the shame that we will bear.
The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.
Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
It certainly destroyed the spin that she is this elite politician, making a huge mistake like that was an amateur move. The woman has failed in most every role she's had so I for one am not surprised.
I watched a video of the debates, some master card shark broke it down how she was signaling Holt. Interesting vid and he was onto something
Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
It certainly destroyed the spin that she is this elite politician, making a huge mistake like that was an amateur move. The woman has failed in most every role she's had so I for one am not surprised.
I watched a video of the debates, some master card shark broke it down how she was signaling Holt. Interesting vid and he was onto something
I agree... she just needs to go off and be a grandma!I don't hate Hillary, she's just not fit to be an American President or hold any political office at all
P.S. I would love to see a woman become president. But I want someone more like Margret Thatcher than Hillary Clinton.
Margaret Thatcher was the most hated woman in Britain and for good reason. She destroyed unions, and Britons are still cleaning up some of her messes. Worse than Reagan, and that's saying a lot.
Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
It certainly destroyed the spin that she is this elite politician, making a huge mistake like that was an amateur move. The woman has failed in most every role she's had so I for one am not surprised.
I watched a video of the debates, some master card shark broke it down how she was signaling Holt. Interesting vid and he was onto something
You assume that she isn't smart enough to bait Drumpf all on her own. Because he's not smart enough to take her on, doesn't mean she can't wipe the floor with fat ass. Which she did - LIKE A BOSS!
Why the hate on Hillary?
Ah because the lying witch called us deplorable.
That one blew up in her face, I'm seeing shirts and such with "Proud Deplorable" on them
It certainly destroyed the spin that she is this elite politician, making a huge mistake like that was an amateur move. The woman has failed in most every role she's had so I for one am not surprised.
I watched a video of the debates, some master card shark broke it down how she was signaling Holt. Interesting vid and he was onto something
You assume that she isn't smart enough to bait Drumpf all on her own. Because he's not smart enough to take her on, doesn't mean she can't wipe the floor with fat ass. Which she did - LIKE A BOSS!
[
Huffy puffy really? A lot of talk for a retard like you.
Deplorable Hillary is rightly hated because she is a life long, career criminal who has stolen millions. She is hated because she is a pathological liar. She is hated because she flaunts the fact that she is above the law, rubbing the faces of the serfs in the nation in the fact that laws don't apply to her. She is hated because she has no honor at all, selling state department access and state secrets to the highest bidder.
She is hated, franco hater dupe bot, because she is like you, complete gutter scum with no redeeming qualities.
Pathetic, ignorant brainwashed functional morons. Change the channel. You are deplorable. See sig, last line.
The OP has it backwards, Hillary hates Americans.
[
Proof?? Evidence??? Witnesses?? How about a Congressional Hearing finding her at fault?
There have been at least 16 investigations into various matters involving the Clintons over the years. The ONLY thing either of them have every been charged with is Bill's perjury charge for lying to Congress about the blow job. No charges, no liability, no nothing.
Tell me again about how corrupt, dishonest and full of shit the Clintons are, because from where I sit, it's the Republican Party who has lied, squandered $100 million dollars of public money, all to take down Bill and Hillary Clinton. If I were them, I'd sue the Republicans for malicious prosecution. At the very least, the party should be made to reimburse the taxpayers for their folly.
Lying useless sacks of Shit.
[
Proof?? Evidence??? Witnesses?? How about a Congressional Hearing finding her at fault?
There have been at least 16 investigations into various matters involving the Clintons over the years. The ONLY thing either of them have every been charged with is Bill's perjury charge for lying to Congress about the blow job. No charges, no liability, no nothing.
Tell me again about how corrupt, dishonest and full of shit the Clintons are, because from where I sit, it's the Republican Party who has lied, squandered $100 million dollars of public money, all to take down Bill and Hillary Clinton. If I were them, I'd sue the Republicans for malicious prosecution. At the very least, the party should be made to reimburse the taxpayers for their folly.
Lying useless sacks of Shit.
So you're just sure that Comey stating;
{“This decision is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.”}
Made America love the crook? Stating that she is above the laws that govern the rest of us just makes us warm and fuzzy about the sleazy crook?
You Communists are some dumb mother fuckers.
[
Comey did not say she was above the law.
Every case is distinct and separate, so her circumstances were such that she neither destroyed evidence, nor withheld it. Remember the part where Comey said "Hillary Clinton did not lie to the FBI". But you claim she did.
Regardless of your opinion, the facts don't agree with you. And while you are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to make up your own set of facts. Willful ignorance is no excuse for you being wrong.
If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.According to the source, the FBI requested the laptops of Clinton's attorneys, Mills and Heather Samuelson, after they conducted a 2014 review of what emails Clinton sent were work-related and which were personal. Work-related emails were turned over to the State Department and personal emails were deleted.Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff for one.These days people want immunity just to avoid becoming famous victims of bs GOP hate propaganda and congressional witch hunts. What closest advisors? LINK?Why do Clinton supporters always sound like Mafia lawyers?Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post
When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.
When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.
When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:
I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.
... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.
Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”
Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.
It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.
Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.
And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.
Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.
Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.
Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?
In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.
Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.
And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.
It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.
Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.
What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?
Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.
We deserve the shame that we will bear.
The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.
There is no double standard. Five of Clinton's closest advisers in the State Department demanded immunity from prosecution before talking to the FBI. No one demands immunity from prosecution unless they know they have engaged in criminal activity. This calls for a special prosecutor to find out just how deeply involved Hillary was in all this criminal activity with her top staff.
In exchange for giving the laptops they used to the FBI, Mills and Samuelson were given a limited immunity agreement from the Department of Justice, the Democratic source said, that they would not face prosecution for any information that was found on those laptops.
"The DOJ and FBI considered my clients to be witnesses and nothing more," said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for Mills. "Indeed, the Justice Department assured us that they believed my clients did nothing wrong. At all points, my clients cooperated with the government's investigation, including voluntarily participating in interviews with the FBI and DOJ.-CNN
More trumped up BS from the dupes and an FBI investigation only in reaction to something finally found after 9 Bengazi witch hunts. Mountains out of molehills, for dupes only. Unfortunately, thanks to idiotic Clinton gotcha media, that's about 68% of the country. BUT COMING DOWN.
. No investigation or interest from anyone about 22 MILLION deleted Bush administration e-mails done illegally on the RNC servers, who actually had tons of stuff to hide.
You are a Communist, as such you see the law as the word of our rulers, to be applied based on the status and standing of a person with the party. Hillary is a part boss, ergo there is no law governing her. Enemies of the party are guilty and should be prosecuted by the IRS purely based on their being enemies of the party - as Obama and Lois Lerner did.
However, we have traditionally been a nation of laws. In 1974 we as an honorable nation declared that even the President was subject to the law. Of course that depended on the honor of Goldwater and other Republicans.
In 1998 we declared "we're just kidding, the law has no bearing on the President.' of course those were democrats, who are gutter scum with no honor or integrity.
Now his crooked wife flaunts that she is above the law.
Hated? yes she is - and rightly so.
