Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.According to the source, the FBI requested the laptops of Clinton's attorneys, Mills and Heather Samuelson, after they conducted a 2014 review of what emails Clinton sent were work-related and which were personal. Work-related emails were turned over to the State Department and personal emails were deleted.Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff for one.These days people want immunity just to avoid becoming famous victims of bs GOP hate propaganda and congressional witch hunts. What closest advisors? LINK?Why do Clinton supporters always sound like Mafia lawyers?Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post
When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.
When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.
When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:
I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.
... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.
Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”
Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.
It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.
Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.
And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.
Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.
Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.
Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?
In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.
Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.
And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.
It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.
Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.
What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?
Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.
We deserve the shame that we will bear.
The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.
There is no double standard. Five of Clinton's closest advisers in the State Department demanded immunity from prosecution before talking to the FBI. No one demands immunity from prosecution unless they know they have engaged in criminal activity. This calls for a special prosecutor to find out just how deeply involved Hillary was in all this criminal activity with her top staff.
In exchange for giving the laptops they used to the FBI, Mills and Samuelson were given a limited immunity agreement from the Department of Justice, the Democratic source said, that they would not face prosecution for any information that was found on those laptops.
"The DOJ and FBI considered my clients to be witnesses and nothing more," said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for Mills. "Indeed, the Justice Department assured us that they believed my clients did nothing wrong. At all points, my clients cooperated with the government's investigation, including voluntarily participating in interviews with the FBI and DOJ.-CNN
More trumped up BS from the dupes and an FBI investigation only in reaction to something finally found after 9 Bengazi witch hunts. Mountains out of molehills, for dupes only. Unfortunately, thanks to idiotic Clinton gotcha media, that's about 68% of the country. BUT COMING DOWN.
. No investigation or interest from anyone about 22 MILLION deleted Bush administration e-mails done illegally on the RNC servers, who actually had tons of stuff to hide.
Then you are a very stupid person. Demanding immunity from prosecution means you believe you have committed crimes and you are invoking your fifth amendment rights against self incrimination. So if you were worried about being called a criminal, demanding immunity will confirm people's belief you are.If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.According to the source, the FBI requested the laptops of Clinton's attorneys, Mills and Heather Samuelson, after they conducted a 2014 review of what emails Clinton sent were work-related and which were personal. Work-related emails were turned over to the State Department and personal emails were deleted.Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff for one.These days people want immunity just to avoid becoming famous victims of bs GOP hate propaganda and congressional witch hunts. What closest advisors? LINK?Why do Clinton supporters always sound like Mafia lawyers?
There is no double standard. Five of Clinton's closest advisers in the State Department demanded immunity from prosecution before talking to the FBI. No one demands immunity from prosecution unless they know they have engaged in criminal activity. This calls for a special prosecutor to find out just how deeply involved Hillary was in all this criminal activity with her top staff.
In exchange for giving the laptops they used to the FBI, Mills and Samuelson were given a limited immunity agreement from the Department of Justice, the Democratic source said, that they would not face prosecution for any information that was found on those laptops.
"The DOJ and FBI considered my clients to be witnesses and nothing more," said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for Mills. "Indeed, the Justice Department assured us that they believed my clients did nothing wrong. At all points, my clients cooperated with the government's investigation, including voluntarily participating in interviews with the FBI and DOJ.-CNN
More trumped up BS from the dupes and an FBI investigation only in reaction to something finally found after 9 Bengazi witch hunts. Mountains out of molehills, for dupes only. Unfortunately, thanks to idiotic Clinton gotcha media, that's about 68% of the country. BUT COMING DOWN.
. No investigation or interest from anyone about 22 MILLION deleted Bush administration e-mails done illegally on the RNC servers, who actually had tons of stuff to hide.
Wasn't that the role James Comey had? In fact isn't James Comey a Republican?
If a Republican FBI Director investigated and can't find anything actionable, how do you expect an independent prosecutor to find anything?
If I worked on Hillary's emails, I'd ask for immunity for just doing my job, too. Not that I thought I'd done anything wrong but when Republicans are screaming "treason" and "lock her up", I not saying a word without it.
[
And you believe this shit.
I am no communist,
nor do I hold any reverence for the government. In fact, I have a healthy scepticism for both government and corporations. On the other hand, I live in a country where we punish governments who don't do the peoples' bidding, or who try to crawl into bed with the corporations - just ask Stephen Harper.
I fact check everyone, from multiple sources.
I find conservatives to be the most willfully uninformed segment of the American electorate.
They are lied to relentlessly by right wing media
and one of the lies they tell is that the MSM can't be trusted. They a sight more honest and trustworthy the Rush or Hannity, all of whom make a living selling your personal information entered on their websites, to an assortment of barely legal scammers, who then support businesses brought to them by their right wing buddies.
Conservatives choose to ignore the scandals, lies and outright abuse of the public purse by Republicans pursuing unicorns, trying to get one of their tin foil hat conspiracies to hang the Clintons with. How much money are you going to let them waste trying to prove their latest made up story - the "pay for play" allegations filed by Judicial Watch? Why not make the Koch Bros. pay for their own witch hunts?
All crap GOP propaganda, dupe. Name a lie and I'll debunk it. Something about politics, maybe? lolPathetic, ignorant brainwashed functional morons. Change the channel. You are deplorable. See sig, last line.
Quit lying bot.
Every time you bring up the lies by the Krooked Klinton Kunt, you remind America of just what a scumbag she is. If your programmers were smart, they would avoid reminding everyone of what a liar and crook Deplorable Hillary is.
But smart, you certainly are not.
Another brainwashed "lawyer"...Breaking: NOTHING illegal found anywhere in this never ending witch hunt. Just bs fodder for FOX etc.Then you are a very stupid person. Demanding immunity from prosecution means you believe you have committed crimes and you are invoking your fifth amendment rights against self incrimination. So if you were worried about being called a criminal, demanding immunity will confirm people's belief you are.If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.According to the source, the FBI requested the laptops of Clinton's attorneys, Mills and Heather Samuelson, after they conducted a 2014 review of what emails Clinton sent were work-related and which were personal. Work-related emails were turned over to the State Department and personal emails were deleted.Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff for one.These days people want immunity just to avoid becoming famous victims of bs GOP hate propaganda and congressional witch hunts. What closest advisors? LINK?
In exchange for giving the laptops they used to the FBI, Mills and Samuelson were given a limited immunity agreement from the Department of Justice, the Democratic source said, that they would not face prosecution for any information that was found on those laptops.
"The DOJ and FBI considered my clients to be witnesses and nothing more," said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for Mills. "Indeed, the Justice Department assured us that they believed my clients did nothing wrong. At all points, my clients cooperated with the government's investigation, including voluntarily participating in interviews with the FBI and DOJ.-CNN
More trumped up BS from the dupes and an FBI investigation only in reaction to something finally found after 9 Bengazi witch hunts. Mountains out of molehills, for dupes only. Unfortunately, thanks to idiotic Clinton gotcha media, that's about 68% of the country. BUT COMING DOWN.
. No investigation or interest from anyone about 22 MILLION deleted Bush administration e-mails done illegally on the RNC servers, who actually had tons of stuff to hide.
Wasn't that the role James Comey had? In fact isn't James Comey a Republican?
If a Republican FBI Director investigated and can't find anything actionable, how do you expect an independent prosecutor to find anything?
If I worked on Hillary's emails, I'd ask for immunity for just doing my job, too. Not that I thought I'd done anything wrong but when Republicans are screaming "treason" and "lock her up", I not saying a word without it.
22 million illegal RNC e-mails under Bush deleted- and they actually had crimes to hide. LOL. Nothing.[
And you believe this shit.
I believe facts and unvarnished truth? Yeah.
I am no communist,
Yeah, I can see that, Comrade.
nor do I hold any reverence for the government. In fact, I have a healthy scepticism for both government and corporations. On the other hand, I live in a country where we punish governments who don't do the peoples' bidding, or who try to crawl into bed with the corporations - just ask Stephen Harper.
You serve your party. You love the government when it is controlled by your party, you hate it when the opposition controls it.
The party is mother, the party is father, all loyalty and respect to the party.
I fact check everyone, from multiple sources.
DailyKOS AND ThinkProgress, huh?
I find conservatives to be the most willfully uninformed segment of the American electorate.
I find you Communists to be outright liars. I find that you of the Khmer Rouge believe that it is clever to lie, that the sign of intelligence is the complete and utter lack of integrity that defines the party you serve.
They are lied to relentlessly by right wing media
You can tell the right wing media, they are the ones riding on Unicorns.
and one of the lies they tell is that the MSM can't be trusted. They a sight more honest and trustworthy the Rush or Hannity, all of whom make a living selling your personal information entered on their websites, to an assortment of barely legal scammers, who then support businesses brought to them by their right wing buddies.
The party press can be trusted, to lie and spin for the party. The DNC controlled media cannot be trusted to report facts and reliable information.
Conservatives choose to ignore the scandals, lies and outright abuse of the public purse by Republicans pursuing unicorns, trying to get one of their tin foil hat conspiracies to hang the Clintons with. How much money are you going to let them waste trying to prove their latest made up story - the "pay for play" allegations filed by Judicial Watch? Why not make the Koch Bros. pay for their own witch hunts?
Such as the pay to play scandal of Obama selling federal commissions out of the white house, Hillary selling access to the State Dept. for donations to the Clinton foundation slush fund, Hillary taking bribes from Iran, et al.
Yeah Comrade, the "conservatives" are ignoring the blatant corruption of your filthy party...
You wouldn't know a fact.Actual facts You wouldn't understand. lol. You dupes can't even look at non bs propaganda. Hilarious.Huffy puffy really? A lot of talk for a retard like you.Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post
When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.
When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.
When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:
I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.
... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.
Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”
Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.
It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.
Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.
And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.
Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.
Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.
Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?
In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.
Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.
And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.
It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.
Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.
What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?
Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.
We deserve the shame that we will bear.
The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.
Dems know when it's hopeless to try- they want progress-, the GOP needs fodder for their propaganda machine, run by the same lying billionaires that run the party, dupes. And only want obstruction and tax cuts for the rich, wars for their military industrial complex.and one wonders why W and O are such good buddies...
1. O covered up for W
2. Hillary will cover up for both
Analyzing Hillary's life, there is nothing to like about it...
1. failed DC Bar Exam - she's "so smart"
2. legal career was nothing but fraud - Whitewater, Castle Grande, Madison S&L
3. a "feminist" who empowers a sex predator and then attacks his victims
4. once in public office herself, did nothing but sell her access and power
I mean, why does anyone like this horrific monster?
If there had been nothing illegal there would have been no reason to demand immunity from prosecution before talking to the FBI. Why not just tell the truth that you couldn't care less what crimes were committed by her staff and by those who sought to cover it up?Another brainwashed "lawyer"...Breaking: NOTHING illegal found anywhere in this never ending witch hunt. Just bs fodder for FOX etc.Then you are a very stupid person. Demanding immunity from prosecution means you believe you have committed crimes and you are invoking your fifth amendment rights against self incrimination. So if you were worried about being called a criminal, demanding immunity will confirm people's belief you are.If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.According to the source, the FBI requested the laptops of Clinton's attorneys, Mills and Heather Samuelson, after they conducted a 2014 review of what emails Clinton sent were work-related and which were personal. Work-related emails were turned over to the State Department and personal emails were deleted.Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff for one.
In exchange for giving the laptops they used to the FBI, Mills and Samuelson were given a limited immunity agreement from the Department of Justice, the Democratic source said, that they would not face prosecution for any information that was found on those laptops.
"The DOJ and FBI considered my clients to be witnesses and nothing more," said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for Mills. "Indeed, the Justice Department assured us that they believed my clients did nothing wrong. At all points, my clients cooperated with the government's investigation, including voluntarily participating in interviews with the FBI and DOJ.-CNN
More trumped up BS from the dupes and an FBI investigation only in reaction to something finally found after 9 Bengazi witch hunts. Mountains out of molehills, for dupes only. Unfortunately, thanks to idiotic Clinton gotcha media, that's about 68% of the country. BUT COMING DOWN.
. No investigation or interest from anyone about 22 MILLION deleted Bush administration e-mails done illegally on the RNC servers, who actually had tons of stuff to hide.
Wasn't that the role James Comey had? In fact isn't James Comey a Republican?
If a Republican FBI Director investigated and can't find anything actionable, how do you expect an independent prosecutor to find anything?
If I worked on Hillary's emails, I'd ask for immunity for just doing my job, too. Not that I thought I'd done anything wrong but when Republicans are screaming "treason" and "lock her up", I not saying a word without it.
Dems know when it's hopeless to try- they want progress-, the GOP needs fodder for their propaganda machine, run by the same lying billionaires that run the party, dupes. And only want obstruction and tax cuts for the rich, wars for their military industrial complex.
I'll go with the FBI, who like other parts of the US Justice system are over zealous if anything. 9 congressional GOP witch hunts and this is the outcome. NADA.. You go with hate propaganda and CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!! theories. A disgrace.If there had been nothing illegal there would have been no reason to demand immunity from prosecution before talking to the FBI. Why not just tell the truth that you couldn't care less what crimes were committed by her staff and by those who sought to cover it up?Another brainwashed "lawyer"...Breaking: NOTHING illegal found anywhere in this never ending witch hunt. Just bs fodder for FOX etc.Then you are a very stupid person. Demanding immunity from prosecution means you believe you have committed crimes and you are invoking your fifth amendment rights against self incrimination. So if you were worried about being called a criminal, demanding immunity will confirm people's belief you are.If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.According to the source, the FBI requested the laptops of Clinton's attorneys, Mills and Heather Samuelson, after they conducted a 2014 review of what emails Clinton sent were work-related and which were personal. Work-related emails were turned over to the State Department and personal emails were deleted.
In exchange for giving the laptops they used to the FBI, Mills and Samuelson were given a limited immunity agreement from the Department of Justice, the Democratic source said, that they would not face prosecution for any information that was found on those laptops.
"The DOJ and FBI considered my clients to be witnesses and nothing more," said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for Mills. "Indeed, the Justice Department assured us that they believed my clients did nothing wrong. At all points, my clients cooperated with the government's investigation, including voluntarily participating in interviews with the FBI and DOJ.-CNN
More trumped up BS from the dupes and an FBI investigation only in reaction to something finally found after 9 Bengazi witch hunts. Mountains out of molehills, for dupes only. Unfortunately, thanks to idiotic Clinton gotcha media, that's about 68% of the country. BUT COMING DOWN.
. No investigation or interest from anyone about 22 MILLION deleted Bush administration e-mails done illegally on the RNC servers, who actually had tons of stuff to hide.
Wasn't that the role James Comey had? In fact isn't James Comey a Republican?
If a Republican FBI Director investigated and can't find anything actionable, how do you expect an independent prosecutor to find anything?
If I worked on Hillary's emails, I'd ask for immunity for just doing my job, too. Not that I thought I'd done anything wrong but when Republicans are screaming "treason" and "lock her up", I not saying a word without it.
Dem rich want reform and for the rich to pay more. DUHDems know when it's hopeless to try- they want progress-, the GOP needs fodder for their propaganda machine, run by the same lying billionaires that run the party, dupes. And only want obstruction and tax cuts for the rich, wars for their military industrial complex.
You are so full of shit it must be expanding your pants...
1. most of the rich in this country are Dems
2. The Dems are the party of four core values - Stealing, Lying, Hating, and Discriminating - "progress" for you?
3. The tax and spending cuts under Bill Clinton did what for the US economy and the deficit?
So you're answer is you're not interested in telling the truth. Ok.I'll go with the FBI, who like other parts of the US Justice system are over zealous if anything. 9 congressional GOP witch hunts and this is the outcome. NADA.. You go with hate propaganda and CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!! theories. A disgrace.If there had been nothing illegal there would have been no reason to demand immunity from prosecution before talking to the FBI. Why not just tell the truth that you couldn't care less what crimes were committed by her staff and by those who sought to cover it up?Another brainwashed "lawyer"...Breaking: NOTHING illegal found anywhere in this never ending witch hunt. Just bs fodder for FOX etc.Then you are a very stupid person. Demanding immunity from prosecution means you believe you have committed crimes and you are invoking your fifth amendment rights against self incrimination. So if you were worried about being called a criminal, demanding immunity will confirm people's belief you are.If you haven't committed a crime you don't demand immunity before cooperating with the FBI. Clearly, Mills was involved in illegal activity regarding the Clinton emails, but the big question remains, how deeply was Clinton involved in this same illegal activity? Were Comey and Lynch pressured by Obama to issue these immunities? How deeply was Clinton personally involved in the cover up? These are all important questions that can only be answered by an independent prosecutor.
Wasn't that the role James Comey had? In fact isn't James Comey a Republican?
If a Republican FBI Director investigated and can't find anything actionable, how do you expect an independent prosecutor to find anything?
If I worked on Hillary's emails, I'd ask for immunity for just doing my job, too. Not that I thought I'd done anything wrong but when Republicans are screaming "treason" and "lock her up", I not saying a word without it.
Then you are a very stupid person. Demanding immunity from prosecution means you believe you have committed crimes and you are invoking your fifth amendment rights against self incrimination. So if you were worried about being called a criminal, demanding immunity will confirm people's belief you are.
So you're answer is you're not interested in telling the truth. Ok.
[
All crap GOP propaganda, dupe.
Name a lie and I'll debunk it. Something about politics, maybe? lol
[
22 million illegal RNC e-mails under Bush deleted- and they actually had crimes to hide. LOL. Nothing.
and one wonders why W and O are such good buddies...
1. O covered up for W
2. Hillary will cover up for both
Analyzing Hillary's life, there is nothing to like about it...
1. failed DC Bar Exam - she's "so smart"
2. legal career was nothing but fraud - Whitewater, Castle Grande, Madison S&L
3. a "feminist" who empowers a sex predator and then attacks his victims
4. once in public office herself, did nothing but sell her access and power
I mean, why does anyone like this horrific monster?
Security on the plane scared everyone about snipers, the plane landed under sniper protocol, and they were told to hurry off the tarmac. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[
All crap GOP propaganda, dupe.
Of course, franco liar dupe bot - truth to you is that which serves the party, all else is lies.
However, you lying for your filthy party does not alter the FACT that Crooked Hillarty lied about sniper fire, that she lied about Chelsea jogging by the WTC on 9/11, or her absurd lie about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary. Her preposterous lie of immigrant grandparents/
Name a lie and I'll debunk it. Something about politics, maybe? lol
What you will do is lie - which is what you always do. You have zero integrity and say anything you think will promote your filthy party.
All crap. You live on another planet.
