Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I supposed you're too stupid to know that the anti-vaccine was due to the mandates. one created the other.Apparently not since many people support vaccine mandates.
it is foolish to be anti vaccination but not the same thing to be opposed to mandates
were you pro mandate?That's a political position you fucking Muppet, not a scientific evaluation of effectiveness.
I'm not anti vaccination. I'm pro rational skepticism, emphasis on rational.
1. It works to lower the severity of the infection.why did they try to mandate the vaccine if it worked?
Yes.were you pro mandate?
listen to yourself. this is what makes a compliant sheep right here^^^^^^^ they have him so confused, up is down!!!1. It works to lower the severity of the infection.
2. It's not as affective as the polio vaccine, you can still get sick.
3. At the beginning they weren't sure if was safe for children, or pregnant women and even know for people who have compromised immune systems so for their sake yes, we want to mandate vaccination for those it is safe for, to minimize the possibility of getting it and lowering the severity of it if you do in order to limit its spred to the people who are still vulnerable.
yep, just as I figured. you are truly the compliant lamb. A vaccine is to protect. if you aren't actually protected than the vaccine doesn't work. For you to believe the other nonsense you wrote is hilarious. You would eat a piece of shit if they sold it right.Yes.
Do something other than just impotently claim something.listen to yourself. this is what makes a compliant sheep right here^^^^^^^ they have him so confused, up is down!!!
Right..... Never-mind that seat belts work most of the time the fact that some people die while using them means they're completely ineffective. Great logic there MAGAt.yep, just as I figured. you are truly the compliant lamb. A vaccine is to protect. if you aren't actually protected than the vaccine doesn't work. For you to believe the other nonsense you wrote is hilarious. You would eat a piece of shit if they sold it right.
seat belts have common sense. So do air bags. Ever have one go off on you? I did, saved my life. there is no evidence vaccines saved lives. I know you will post some nonsense from your masters, but your compliance isn't mine.Right..... Never-mind that seat belts work most of the time the fact that some people die while using them means they're completely ineffective. Great logic there MAGAt.
As do vaccines.seat belts have common sense. So do air bags.
Can you do anything but call it nonsense? Can you attack the veracity of the findings? No. Of course you can't.Ever have one go off on you? I did, saved my life. there is no evidence vaccines saved lives. I know you will post some nonsense from your masters, but your compliance isn't mine.
they didn't work. so no, factually wrong.As do vaccines.
Like I said, you'd eat shit if they sold it to you!Can you do anything but call it nonsense? Can you attack the veracity of the findings? No. Of course you can't.
Prove it. Try scientific evidence this time instead of Rachael Maddow....they didn't work. so no, factually wrong.
You sharing fantasies because you've run out of ability is nothing new.Like I said, you'd eat shit if they sold it to you!
Prove it. Try scientific evidence this time instead of Rachael Maddow....
no studies, none that showed they worked.
How would you do that though? Humans aren't perfect and won't be able to avoid at least some bias. If we allow more variety, competition will help weed out the unethical or inaccurate reporters. Do you have any proof that currently news reporters are being bought by politicians?Not in my opinion. News needs to be isolated from parties, truth is all that should ever be reported. Not purchased lines over the air.
So you're saying extremism and radicalism doesn't exist?Extremist and radical trend to just be pejoratives for people's who's view point you disagree with.
I agree about this. We have much many more options now. However, there needs to be more diversity on TV and less censorship from platforms online.What's easier or more plentiful than all the internet has to offer? There has never been a time of more options for news than this one.
I'm saying that your definition of extreme or radical is ultimately going to just be people who you vehemently disagree with. It's a subjective notion. There is no objective extreme, just what's extreme from your point of view.So you're saying extremism and radicalism doesn't exist?
We're also living in a time of unprecedented diversity in media.I agree about this. We have much many more options now. However, there needs to be more diversity on TV and less censorship from platforms online.
