Or maybe they're sellout marionettes for the owners, who have more concern for advertisers than real news.
Occam's razor and all that.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Zone1 Why was a sourced article moved to conspiracy theories?
- Thread starter Missourian
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Occam's razor and all that.
Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
Having both would certainly lead to one turning down the offer, anyway.Aren't principles and healthy self esteem enough?
It's like with me, (now setting aside the fact they hate me so this is all moot as all get up), but I am PERFECTLY satisfied with my life. I own my own business and don't even like to control my employees. I mostly leave them alone and am about the most libertarian boss imaginable. Power and control is not what motivates me.
Being a hall monitor would never appeal to me to begin with.
- Thread starter
- #23
Gateway pundit burned me on a story I posted here a decade ago and I was so embarrassed I've never used them again...so I hear ya. But, that was apparently who was reporting on it at the time the thread was started. It's not my thread btw.Okay - it certainly wouldn't surprise if the claim is true. But you asked why it was moved to conspiracy theories --> you linked to gateway pundit and dailymail. I can't speak for the mods, but when I see sources like that, I take the post with a huge grain of salt, if I bother to read it at all.
As you know, once a thread is started... that's the thread. I posted the NY Post link further down the thread and Godboy posted the Newsweek link.
Developing: Biden Ordered US Navy To Blow Up Russia’s Nord Stream 2 Pipeline In Secret Pre-planned Attack
Who signed off on this foolish foreign policy disaster? Did Pelosi and Schumer know about this? Biden has been wrong on EVERY foreign policy decision he has ever made.
www.usmessageboard.com
Investigative Journalist : US bombed Nord Stream pipeline
https://archive.is/BsHj1 And the way the times UK attacks this man's credibility is all the proof I need he's speaking truth
www.usmessageboard.com
Last edited:
Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
Shrug,The dailymail and gateway pundit are "sources" of propaganda and little else.
MSNBC, CNN and countless others likewise.
- Thread starter
- #26
I'm just seeking parity.
How many threads have I read this year based on Raw Story, Occupy Democrats and rando tweets that don't end up moved anywhere...but a Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists article is immediately relegated to Conspiracy Theories...
How many threads have I read this year based on Raw Story, Occupy Democrats and rando tweets that don't end up moved anywhere...but a Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists article is immediately relegated to Conspiracy Theories...
Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
It is obviously agenda drivenI'm just seeking parity.
How many threads have I read based on Raw Story, Occupy Democrats and rando tweets that don't end up moved anywhere...but a Pulitzer Prize winning journalists article is immediately relegated to Conspiracy Theories...
just like everything else here.
Not gon getit.I'm just seeking parity.
- Thread starter
- #29
It is obviously agenda driven
just like everything else here.
Not gon getit.
It's frustrating to see the rules applied unevenly.
I have no idea if this report is accurate or hogwash...but it should be left where it was posted for discussion by the members IMO.
I see your gripe, but I certainly wouldn't want to be mod and have to deal with the firehose of conspiracy crap that gets posted here.It's frustrating to see the rules applied unevenly.
I have no idea if this report is accurate or hogwash...but it should be left where it was posted for discussion by the members IMO.
- Thread starter
- #31
I see your gripe, but I certainly wouldn't want to be mod and have to deal with the firehose of conspiracy crap that gets posted here.
Me either.
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
Moderation on here is in the shitter
Because it is a lie!A Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporter writes a story with sources and it's moved to Conspiracy Theories?
Can the bias be any more pronounced?
flacaltenn, what is going on around here?
Things have been bad before... but this is the absolute worst it's ever been.
Investigative Journalist : US bombed Nord Stream pipeline
https://archive.is/BsHj1 And the way the times UK attacks this man's credibility is all the proof I need he's speaking truth
I'm a certified diver. I know divers would not be used to sabotage a 100m deep pipeline. Death risk would be above 50%. Plus almost certain brain & organ damage would occur. It would take divers a month in a decompression chamber at that.
- Thread starter
- #34
Because it is a lie!
I'm a certified diver. I know divers would not be used to sabotage a 100m deep pipeline. Death risk would be above 50%. Plus almost certain brain & organ damage would occur. It would take divers a month in a decompression chamber at that.
Which begs the question -- what kind of people sell their souls to the devil just to have power over others?
I respect those who say "I'm not going to represent this shit" I have nothing but scorn for those whose personal opinions are one thing, but are willing to sell their own views down the river by also selling out those who actually share them.
I have found a LOT of that here lately.
Douchebags in my experience.
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
Because it is a lie!
I'm a certified diver. I know divers would not be used to sabotage a 100m deep pipeline. Death risk would be above 50%. Plus almost certain brain & organ damage would occur. It would take divers a month in a decompression chamber at that.
Recreational diver.... right!
Because it is a lie!
I'm a certified diver. I know divers would not be used to sabotage a 100m deep pipeline. Death risk would be above 50%. Plus almost certain brain & organ damage would occur. It would take divers a month in a decompression chamber at that.
You are so full of shit. 100m is NOTHING! Hell I know saturation divers that did work at 500m you ignorant boob.
Why don't you attempt that? That is an extremely risky stunt for a sabotage operation. There wouldn't be enough time for real work to happen. Drones would have been the only real choice for such an operation.
- Thread starter
- #39
Scientific American is reporting the break at 70 meters.Why don't you attempt that? That is an extremely risky stunt for a sabotage operation. There wouldn't be enough time for real work to happen. Drones would have been the only real choice for such an operation.
Frequent Breaks in Undersea Pipelines Mean Fixes Are Possible for Nord Stream
While international experts try to figure out what caused the ruptures in the Nord Stream pipeline, engineers have multiple options to try and fix it
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
Scientific American is reporting the break at 70 meters.
Frequent Breaks in Undersea Pipelines Mean Fixes Are Possible for Nord Stream
While international experts try to figure out what caused the ruptures in the Nord Stream pipeline, engineers have multiple options to try and fix itwww.scientificamerican.com
He probably snorkels
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Similar threads
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 33
- Replies
- 148
- Views
- 961
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8154
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-